Dignity in care: we need the tools to deliver solutions

January 13, 2010 9:53 am

Author:

Share this Article

Social CareBy Diana Smith / @mulberrybush

We go through phases when the question of how we are going to care for an ageing population comes briefly to the top of the media’s attention for a couple days and then sinks without trace again.

This is a pattern I have been watching for about ten years now, and at times I find it a little frustrating. For the last couple of days I’ve been unable to escape it. It started with my reading some of the transcripts from the Midstaffs foundation trust Inquiry. I spent an afternoon this week at Stafford University, meeting with a symposium of health and care experts who are considering the implications of the equality bill for our Health and Care services. Then I watched Dispatches with Fiona Phillips talking about her father’s Alzheimer’s disease.

Then I listened to the BBC’s Thought for the Day, which dealt with how changing our attitudes to the elderly is central to the delivery of better care. Later, I listened to You and Yours, with dignity champion Sir Michael Parkinson. They didn’t use the audioboo I sent them so I’ve included it here.

Listen!

Tomorrow I will be seeing the chief executive at Stafford Hospital and I expect the quality of care and how we can continue to improve this to be a key issue in our discussion.

In discussions about the challenges that our health and care systems are presenting I find myself using a stock phrase “old age is not what it used to beâ€. If we look at what has been happening over the last couple of decades, the general improvements in health mean that people live far longer, and the highly dependent period of increasingly old and frail people at the end of life extends not just for a matter of just weeks or months, but in many cases years. Because I went through eight years of this with my mother’s dementia, I have a pretty clear idea of the impact this can have on families.

Like many people who have been through a difficult experience it matters to me to try and ensure that not too many other people have to go through the same problems.

There was a common theme running through all these programmes: that when we see problems with care we are very seldom looking at deliberate culpable cruelty or neglect. We are virtually always looking at a combination of overstretched and undervalued staff, who are working in surroundings that may not have been well designed for the purpose, and who are exhibiting the same kind of casual ageism that is present in virtually all of us. Sometimes this amounts to inappropriate behaviour, more often it is just a failure to relate to the person who is at the receiving end of the care as a person.

Ageing

The simple graphic above compares the shape of the population structure in 1950, 2000, and 2050. I think it shows pretty clearly why Health and Care systems designed in the 1940s are creaking under the strain now, and shows even more clearly why they will simply not cope by 2050.

Over the last couple of years we have perhaps been reaching the point where the problems of caring for the elderly have become a little more visible to a public who might have preferred not to see.

For me personally I find the continued media focus on the individual stories very frustrating. I know the problems. I also think that a lot of very important work has been done which moves us a lot closer to the possibility of real solutions. The green paper on care with the possibility of putting care funding on a realistic basis, and creating a National Care Service are to my mind some of the most important legislative proposals around. This is something that was built around lengthy and in depth consultation with stakeholder organisations. I have personally been taking part in these consultation exercises for five years now. The Green Paper was seen as a hugely positive step by the stakeholder groups, and I believe it would be welcomed by many ordinary people who are concerned about the possibility of losing their life savings on care, if they know of its existence at all. It is a proposal which can potentially win very strong cross party support, but it is something that only the Labour Party is proposing.

For me, the astonishing thing about the Dispatches programme and You and Yours is that they never mentioned the Green paper or the National Care Service.

The Dignity in Care campaign and the Equality Bill are both important in helping to create the climate for better care. The creation of a National Care Service is vitally important for providing a framework to deliver it.

If we want people to understand not merely the problems associated with elderly people in the health and care services, but also the solutions we are going to need, then I think we are going to have to work a lot harder to get this message across.



tweetmeme_source = 'tweetmeme';

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Featured The biggest posts of 2014, part one

    The biggest posts of 2014, part one

    2014 is coming to a close, and 2015 is on the horizon, so we wanted to take a look back over some of the biggest LabourList posts from our biggest year ever. We’ve had over 1.1 million unique readers in 2014, reading around 8 million pages – and we’re expecting next year to be even bigger still. Here’s what you’ve been reading: The Liveblogs LabourList’s much-loved liveblogs reached new heights in 2014, attracting hundreds of thousands of readers – even […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Crossing borders: choosing hearts and minds

    Crossing borders: choosing hearts and minds

    This article is from Our Labour, Our Communities – a pamphlet of 10 PPCs essays, published by LabourList in partnership with Lisa Nandy MP. “I am not voting as you are all the same.” These are the words of Mary, a 67-year-old woman who shared this with me when I asked who she was going to vote for. Mary’s feeling about party politics – and those of thousands of others like her – are a testimony to the disengagement running […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Scotland If the SNP want their MPs to support the bedroom tax, they want a deal with the Tories

    If the SNP want their MPs to support the bedroom tax, they want a deal with the Tories

    If Labour is elected in May, we’ll abolish the bedroom tax. You can’t have a clearer pledge than that. But this weekend we’ve seen that, for the SNP, the bedroom tax is about politics, not principles. Yesterday, the inner workings of the SNP party machine were exposed, when a potential SNP candidate said he was rejected by the party because he said he would not support the bedroom tax if the party leadership told him to. The candidate was told […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The case for responsible capitalism

    The case for responsible capitalism

    This article is from Our Labour, Our Communities – a pamphlet of 10 essays by Labour PPCs, published by LabourList in partnership with Lisa Nandy MP. To win elections, political parties must undeniably demonstrate that they can handle the economy. Labour did this in 1997 on a ticket that protected the well-off, that reassured we would not return to the tax-and-spend of the 1970s; we were the new Party of Business and we would get out of the way so that they […]

    Read more →
  • Featured 5 of the most important Labour moments of 2014

    5 of the most important Labour moments of 2014

    2014 has been an eventful year for the Labour Party – and 2015 looks set to be more eventful still with the General Election now only a few months away. Our editorial team wanted to cover five of the most important Labour moments in 2014 which have helped define the year for the Labour Party – here they are: Scotland’s referendum – Conor Pope The Scottish referendum was always going to be one of the year’s most important political events. The fact […]

    Read more →