On two of the defining issues of our time for young people, Ken was on our side

June 21, 2010 10:42 am

Ken LivingstoneBy Veronica King / @Vron_King

London needs a mayor who calls the big issues right and will stand up for Londoners. Consistently, and on issues of importance to young party members, that candidate is Ken Livingstone.

The budget this week will give a clearer indication of where this government is taking the country. It is already a Thatcherite horror-show.

David Cameron and Professor Alan Budd, the head of the new Office of Budget Responsibility, were advisers to Norman Lamont when Britain was forced out of the ERM. The policies emerging will make the majority pay whilst helping a rich few. We are going to see attacks on pensions, pay and public services, VAT rises for the many, but cuts to corporation tax. National insurance payments will be up for employees, but not for employers.

Students and young people are already on the receiving end: scrapping Labour’s Future Jobs Fund for unemployed young people, scrapping 10,000 extra university places from this September, and restricting access to free school meals. David Willetts has revealed a lot about the Tories’ approach to young people by labelling students a “burden on the taxpayer.” Willetts’ remarks have widely been seen as softening up public opinion for an increase in student fees, just as the government overall is softening up opinion for massive cuts.

All of this is presented in a way that suggests there is no alternative. But progressive politics is about finding alternatives to policies that make the majority pay whilst a few at the top benefit.

Yesterday, the publication of new government figures on the cost of the wars Britain has waged in the last decade gave the clearest possible example of how choices really do exist. £20billion has been spent in Iraq and Afghanistan. As Ken Livingstone pointed out at the weekend, that is ten times the cost of scrapping fees for students for one year – or the equivalent of ten years of student fees.

It is exactly on those grounds that Ken is the best choice for students and young people. On both issues he called it right for the majority of us. There is an absolutely clear choice in the Labour selection on this issue for former and present students who are Labour members.

As a student myself in 2004 when the Higher Education Bill was going through parliament, and then again when top-up fees came in, Ken was the highest profile and most senior Labour politician who backed students and supported our cause.

And when earlier legislation was first introduced in 1998 to charge students for their university education, and also to completely remove grants in 1998, the main amendment in parliament against this, which would have kept the grant, was backed by 34 Labour MPs. Ken Livingstone was one of them. Ken also helped lead the campaign outside parliament against removing grants during that time. Again, that presents a clear choice in the selection for Labour’s candidate.

And when hundreds of thousands of young people including students marched against the war in Iraq, Ken was with them too.

Those two issues are linked not only because of their mobilisation of many young people but because they show that Ken is a politician who calls the biggest issues right and understands that big choices in politics do exist. We don’t have to back the right wing of American politics; we don’t have to distort our economy through our support for wars and military adventures; and we don’t have to accept the orthodoxy that young people and students should get a worse deal.

These are issues that saw Labour alienate key groups of voters – Ken maintained his links with those voters and we must learn the lesson of that.

Now, with a vicious right wing cuts agenda emanating from Whitehall, we need a Labour candidate for City Hall who calls things right, as Ken did not only on the biggest issue of the last decade – Iraq – or on the central issue for student finance, but on the big issues for London, such as congestion charging, neighbourhood policing, transport investment, better buses and free travel for under-18s. And he is doing it now in this selection by setting out the challenging circumstances London will face in 2012 and what our priorities should be to protect Londoners.

Labour needs a mayoral candidate with a proven ability to govern, who will always fight for the best deal for Londoners and who has the strength of character not to bow what the media or the whips are saying – and who gets the big choices facing us right.

Veronica King is a Young Labour member in Tooting and vice chair of Ken Livingstone’s campaign for the London mayoralty.

Related posts:

  1. There’s a worrying disconnection between young people and politics – it’s time to act on Votes at 16
  2. People don’t understand why I’d want to be a councillor – but I’m proud of our young people in Lambeth
  3. Balls: People said we weren’t on their side
  4. Give young people a voting card, not a shovel
  5. Without young people there is no future

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Westminster On prayer in Parliament

    On prayer in Parliament

    The court ruling that prayers should not be on the formal council agenda at Bideford Town Council has been met with predictable outrage. The Mail says it could be extended to Parliament – I’m not sure it’s quite the same scenario, as in Parliament prayers are said when the session begins, at say. 2.30pm, and then another bell goes a few minutes later and those who didn’t want to be in there for prayers enter the Chamber. So you can [...]

    Read more →
  • Video Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Burnham: ‘Pride’ put before NHS

    Read more →