When it comes to inequality, we have bigger problems than Oxbridge and internships

June 2, 2011 1:03 pm

EqualityBy Emma Burnell / @scarletstand

We have huge problems of inequality in this country. Inequality blights lives, and dooms futures.

We need to talk about inequality. We need big sweeping policies that get to the core of why we value economically useful skills over socially useful skills. We need to talk about how we reward socially useful work when our entire system of reward is based on finance; How better to share the proceeds of growth between all who contribute economically and socially; How to manage the risk of loss where it can have the least damaging societal impact.

But all too often when we have these conversations we end up talking ourselves into tiny cul-de-sacs. We talk about internships and Oxbridge rather than work and reward and universal education. We talk about boardroom and political representation and not cultural mores and societal prejudice.

While equal access to the most elite institutions is a vital part of working towards equality, it will not be the daily lived experience of inequality for most. Most people who struggle on low wages or against ingrained prejudices do so at far lower levels. Tinkering at the top has little effect on their lives.

Labour have come again to accept that trickle-down economics doesn’t work. Why do we not yet accept that trickle-down sociology is not the answer either? Role models are great and very important. But they are only one of many policy levers we should be investigating. An over-reliance on high-profile tinkering distracts from the greater need for societal change.

Please don’t misunderstand me. I don’t want Labour to abandon programmes that have done well in increasing our own diversity and the opening up of opportunities to all. But we need to accept that we were too focused on treating symptoms, and were not focused enough on treating the causes of inequality.

Yes, we do need to be technocrats. We need to bring in solutions to parts of the whole. We can’t be so blinded by the scale of the problem that we lose our ability to take steps along the road.

But we also need to be visionaries. We need to have a truly inspiring goal that these technocratic solutions are working towards. We need to have no boundaries to our thinking and our belief in the journey. The steps we take should be about marching towards an eventual aim not skirting around the issues.

I don’t claim to know all the answers. But I am worried that we have stopped asking the questions at all.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    Where are the women over 50 on our TV screens?

    Most people like to think that we live in a society that is fair and equal but for some it is still not equal at all. When it comes to TV presenters, women disappear when they reach over the age of 50. As part of the work of the Older Women’s Commission, I wrote to the six main UK broadcasters asking them how many older women they employ on screen and behind the camera. The figures provided by broadcasters show [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    The Loneliness of the Long Distance Leader

    That’s it. Enough is enough. I try to be reasonable. But you can only push somebody so far. It’s time to sort this out once and for all. I am fed up with this huge and growing army of sycophants and cheerleaders constantly bigging up Ed Miliband, and making helpful or supportive interventions on his behalf. The list is endless. Let’s shine a spotlight on the guilty men and women. There’s… well, there’s… er… you know… er… thingy… on a [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Europe We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    We do not stigmatise your country, Deputy Prime Minister. It is you and your party we find distasteful

    Last Saturday a senior European politician wrote an article in the British press which made you want to shout at the computer screen. Not such an unusual event, you might think, but this was not a debater’s disagreement as one might have had with the viewpoint of a Tory, a Gaullist or a Christian Democrat. It was one which also left the reader feeling a bit nauseous. And that is because, rather than an honestly-expressed case justified with some evidence, it was [...]

    Read more →
  • News Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Watson urges investigation of “supressed” Leveson evidence – Media roundup: May 21st, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this in your inbox. You can sign up here. Labour proposes teachers spend time in industry “All teachers involved in vocational education would have to spend a period of each year in industry, under Labour plans to integrate further education with emerging skills gaps identified by businesses. The strategy – announced on [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Is party politics dying out?

    Is party politics dying out?

    This week has brought the role of party members and activists back to the front pages. That’s rather unusual to be honest – and rightly so, as party members (swivel eyed and otherwise) make up only 1% of the British population. Being a party member is already a niche interest. You are somewhat odd if you’re a party member – sorry to break that to you, but of course I’m odd too (and quite possibly odder than you). What swivel-eyed [...]

    Read more →