Arnie Graf presents a challenge to both party fixers and party stalwarts alike

November 22, 2012 6:20 pm

There’s a fantastic piece by Rowenna Davis in the Guardian today on Arnie Graf “The man Ed Miliband asked to rebuild Labour”. Graf is certainly an interesting character, and on the few times I’ve met him I’ve been hugely impressed by his calm demeanour and vast experience. (And also by the fact that he looks at least ten years younger than his 68 years.)

But what’s most impressive is his vision for Labour. The kind of party that Graf seems to be striving towards – one that’s more open, relational and transparent – is hugely appealing, and if handled correctly offers a potential template for both electoral success, and transformational Labour-lead change in communities across the country.

I’m particularly drawn to Graf’s assertion that attempts to stitch up decisions in the party may be part of the reason Labour has experienced failures in the past. As I noted just last week, even the perception of a stitch up is toxic. Sadly, there are a not insignificant number of people in the party who seem to think winning internal battles/selections is more important than ether changing the country or winning elections. A different (yet similar) group believe that the procedure of internal party meetings is more important than the outcome, and how many people turn up next time.

Graf has been particularly scathing about the party’s meeting culture, saying :

“At the end of meetings I’d rather chew off my arm with my own teeth than go back. I thought the smartest people are the ones who didn’t come. “

I can honestly say that’s an accurate appraisal of the vast majority of party meetings I’ve attended. But for some they seem to be considered delightful social occasions to be repeated an extended indefinitely. I’ve never quite understood that…

At times it can feel like these people – the fixers and the meetings for meetings sake mob – have the party in an apathy chokehold, seeking to win ever more battles by hoping that everyone else simply gives up and stops caring.

And all too often that’s exactly what happens.

But if Graf’s vision of a radically different Labour presents challenges for the party’s more difficult souls, it also presents challenges for many other Labour Party members and activists too. His approach is more about community campaigning politics than voter ID. His desire for openness in terms of selections (perhaps going as far as primaries) may jar with the way many members view party membership.

In short – he wants to see a kind of social democratic community based political party in Britain that is quite alien to the Labour Party that most of us know and (sometimes begrudgingly) love.

That’s quite a lofty ambition, and it will be made all the more difficult by the fact that the party fixers and the meeting-loving stalwarts will be united against him. But the prize – a bigger, more engaged party that can be a genuine force in communities AND Westminster – seems more than worth the hassle.

  • MarkHoulbrook

    Good Article Mark. On reading both articles it is very clear there is a spot of de ja vu in there somewhere. I wonder where some members of the NEC, Ed Miliband et al have heard all this before…and even you Mark. One thing is for sure it was not from a secret report.

  • Daniel Speight

    Step by step. Return power from the London leadership to the CLPs first.

  • AlanGiles

    It is quite incredible – Cameron appoints Australian Lynton Crosby to take care of business and so Miliband feels he has to import the man from Chicago. So it seems nobody from our own country has the talent of gumption to solve the problems of the British.

    I know that will sound insular and parochial to some, but it is indicative of this “us, too” philosophy that pervades British politics today. One side follows the other.

    Will it work?. Well, at the 2015 election if Lord Mandy has another pal like Jonathan Reynolds or Tristram Hunt he wants parachuted into a safe seat (let’s say for example Blair junior) will he get his way, or will he just shrug and let Joe or Joanne Bloggs a local person get the nomination?.

    Trust has to be earned – and it isn’t earned by importing overseas “thinkers” (and Mr Graf is so knowledgable he asked “who is Ed Miliband?”).

    But here is the biggest joke of the lot: the man imported to make Labour transparent?. What does that newspaper article say? “Graf’s report was never published, and he remains influential but near invisible to those outside Labour’s inner circle.”

    Yes, VERY transparent.

    • http://www.labourlist.org/mark_ferguson Mark Ferguson

      Graf has been around for nearly two years, Crosby hasn’t even been hired yet. And their roles are completely different. Ever the cynic eh Alan?

    • AlanGiles

      “Mark Ferguson: Graf has been around for nearly two years, Crosby hasn’t”

      Crosby was “helping” Michael Howard back in 2005 (“are you thinking what we’re thinking?” – remember) and I don’t suppose it impossible that he met up with Cameron et al while he was more recently working for Johnson in London).

      But the point remains, a bloke from Chicago (or Australia) is more likely to have his finger on the pulse of the nation than somebody in and from the UK?. Doesn’t say much for us, does it, jointly and severally?

  • https://mikestallard.virtualgallery.com/ Mike Stallard

    Meanwhile the party faithful are departing from all political parties in droves and the party income, in all parties, comes from either the TUs or else private donors.

  • Monkey_Bach

    Eeek. It’s a funny old world. The only people claiming to have a clue as per what to do about anything these days are unelected advisers or think-tank drones often not even members of the political parties they advise; without such characters our elected politicians would apparently be clueless and have to be led around the universe of political discourse like wide-eyed children! Personally I’d much prefer politicians to have their own ideas, convictions, stand for something, and act under their own volition, rather than coached and controlled by others, like ventriloquist dummies, having most of the words they speak put in their mouths by unelected ambiguous characters like Arnie Graf, Graeme Cooke, Alastair Campbell, Andy Coulson, Steve Hilton and creeps like David Freud (which charlatan determined the disastrous welfare policies of both the Labour AND Conservative Parties so committed was he to a political cause). Eeek. I have an idea! Why not save a lot of time and money and just let MPs nominate people like this as their champions, abrogate responsibility, stand back, and give let the SpAds fight their political battles for them in proxy? Cut out the middle man and all that. You know it makes sense. Eeek.

    • alfred

      I’m a Labour Party member in my mid seventies. Been a member over 50 years. Unfortunately, Arnie Graf describes my local party

  • Pingback: What You Can Get Away With (Nick Barlow's blog) » Blog Archive » If Labour won’t listen to Arnie Graf, should the Liberal Democrats?

Latest

  • News Video “Our country only works for a tiny elite few at the top, and this Labour Party knows that must change” – Miliband responds to the referendum result

    “Our country only works for a tiny elite few at the top, and this Labour Party knows that must change” – Miliband responds to the referendum result

    This morning, Ed Miliband gave a speech, following on from Johann Lamont and Alistair Darling, in which he responded to the results of the referendum. He clearly emphasised that although Scotland voted to remain part of the UK, this was the beginning of massive change across the country: “this was a vote for change. change doesn’t end today. Change begins today…devolution is not just a good idea for Scotland and Wales, it is a good idea for England and indeed Northern […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The English question must now be settled too

    The English question must now be settled too

    So it’s a No. But the process of constitutional change is only just beginning. While it is not yet clear precisely what additional powers on tax, spending and welfare, the Scottish Parliament will get, the binding pledge of the main Westminster party leaders will have to be honoured. But in the process, the English question must be settled too. The first, curmudgeonly, reactions of predominantly Tory MPs has been to complain about Scotland’s special treatment. Before too long, resentment will […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Scotland What happens now? We keep our promises to Scotland – and we build a better Britain​

    What happens now? We keep our promises to Scotland – and we build a better Britain​

    Well that was close. Not as close as it might have been. But far too close. We never should have got to such a position, but post-mortems can wait until tomorrow at least. There are bigger issues at stake. This is certainly no time for triumphalism. Relief? Pride? Happiness? Of course. Our union is stronger today. But Scotland is divided. 45% of those who voted – 1.5 million people – actively chose to leave the UK. The vast majority of […]

    Read more →
  • News Video “We have chosen unity over division” – Alistair Darling

    “We have chosen unity over division” – Alistair Darling

    With the votes counted, and Scotland voting NO to independence, Alistair Darling – head of the Better Together campaign – gave this speech on the referendum outcome.  He stressed that although Scotland had voted NO, this doesn’t mean that the commitment to devolution has faded away:  “The people of scotland have spoken, it is a clear result, they have kept our country of four nations together and as millions of other people, I am delighted…Now it is time for our […]

    Read more →
  • News Scotland have voted No to independence, say LabourList readers

    Scotland have voted No to independence, say LabourList readers

    In a few hours time, we will find out that Scotland has voted against independence – according to LabourList readers, anyway. 77% of those who took our survey this week said they thought that the outcome of today’s referendum would be a No vote. Despite polls have closed in over the past fortnight, our readers are confident that Scots will have chosen to preserve the Union. 23% think that the result will be in favour of Yes. Only two polls in […]

    Read more →