Housing the North

30th November, 2012 2:11 pm

Tags:

By Ann Pittard

The minister charged with planning, Nick Boles, this week joined the chorus of those looking for more English land to build upon with his claim that we should find 2-3% more land to build on. This chimes well with the Northern Economic Futures Commission’s call for a ‘Mapping the Futures’ programme to drive national spatial planning for the next 20 years.

But he need look no further. Rich in land, home to vast construction supply chain and boasting world-leading specialist expertise, the North presents the ideal location to restock the English housing market, to rebalance the economy, and to develop innovation in housing and neighbourhoods. It is time that these Northern assets were used to their full effect.

All too often, comment on the malaise of our national housing market centres on London and the South East. There is little doubt that the problems in the capital’s housing market are wide, and run deep, with rents extortionate and prices prohibitive. As valid as these comments are, often they ignore the persistent problems to the north of the M25.

In fact, housing in the north is in a state of crisis; a crisis stemming from two problems. The first we share with other parts of the UK – not enough good quality homes. The widening gap between supply and demand has left increasing numbers of Northern families dislocated from the housing market. Unlike comparable areas further South, many Northern towns and cities face continuing stagnation in new housing supply.  In London last year, net completions were only 8% short of the levels achieved at the height of the boom in 2006/07.  Southern unitary districts were not far behind.  In contrast, new housing delivery in Northern Mets lagged at less than half the 2006/07 level.  And in Greater Manchester, that powerhouse of the Northern economy, completions were 70% below 2006/07 levels (NHF 2012).

This growing shortfall in housing increases pressures on house prices, which despite recession have risen in the North more than in any other region outside of the capital.  Between 2001-2011, house prices rose by 106% across the North East, North West, and Yorkshire and Humber, but earnings rose by only 31%. (NHF, 2012). The lack of affordable homes and available mortgages increases pressure on the rented sector, which are set to rise in the North by 29% over the next six years (NHF, 2012), while earnings continue to stagnate.  The result of the combined pressures is that more people are forced onto the housing waiting lists (already disproportionately high in Northern England).

The second problem Northern England has is very large numbers on Housing Benefit. There are 1.35 million Housing Benefit claimants in the three Northern regions of England, costing the country around £100million pounds a week in rent subsidies, and the numbers continue to rise (DWP, 2012). In the current spending round, Housing Benefit expenditure is projected to be £94.5 billion up to 2015 for the UK, against only £4.5 billion in grants and capital expenditure to build new homes.(Cooke and Hull, 2012) This significant mismatch between capital and revenue expenditure is doing little to resolve chronic under-supply.

A revival of Northern, and national economic fortunes would play a significant part reducing undersupply, and reversing Housing Benefit expenditure; equally, a revival of house building would have significant positive effects on the state of the Northern economy and the size of the benefit bill. But Northern councils have legal responsibilities but little power to deliver meaningful change for the people of their area.

This is a why a fresh approach is needed. Building upon the work of the Together at Home review (Cooke and Hull, 2012), the Northern Economic Futures Commission has argued that the expenditure on Housing Benefit would be better invested in solving the housing supply problem.

We recommend a Sub-regional Housing Fund, radically devolving funding to groups of local authorities, channeling capital expenditure on house building with Housing Benefit expenditure into one local block grant. Based on current expenditure, Manchester would be allocated up to £681million over a three year period, and £663million in Leeds. This level of devolved financing would allow communities to plan and decide on their own housing arrangements, from the houses they build, to their own model for replacing Housing Benefit. For instance, the grant could be used to commission long-term deals with housing developers to build new affordable housing; to purchase existing properties not in residential use, or to release rented housing for those who need it most by facilitating mortgages for those who want to get a foot on the housing ladder. Such proposals are not without challenges but the case is too compelling to ignore, and we are confident that Northern cities will look seriously at the concept in the next iterations of City Deals.

Ann Pittard is Large Business Development Lead for Leeds City Region and a member of IPPR North’s Northern Economic Future Commission. The final report was launched in Leeds today

Latest

  • Featured News Labour have been “in denial” about threat from UKIP, says Dan Jarvis

    Labour have been “in denial” about threat from UKIP, says Dan Jarvis

    Dan Jarvis has slammed Labour for being “in denial” about the threat caused by UKIP, in a new report published this weekend. ‘Reconnecting Labour’, which was commissioned by Andy Burnham in July as part of his campaign to become leader, looks specifically at how Labour wins back votes lost to the anti-EU party. Jarvis raises concerns that the EU referendum a new high-profile platform that could cause further problems for Labour. He says that Labour were too relaxed about the […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The Labour leadership contest: too much politics and not enough personality

    The Labour leadership contest: too much politics and not enough personality

    Our recent prime ministers were not elected to lead their parties following general election defeats, and there are many problems with electing leaders whilst on the rebound. One of the biggest is that everyone is still in General Election Mode, presenting manifestos rather than their qualities as a leader. Policies and ideas are not wedded to any one person – any candidate could institute a policy suggested by any other candidate. Having good ideas qualifies one for the top table, […]

    Read more →
  • Comment What lessons does Lynton Crosby have for Labour?

    What lessons does Lynton Crosby have for Labour?

    After May’s general election, it appeared everyone in the party who tweeted or blogged was sure they knew why Labour had lost. By some weird coincidence, these opinions always seemed to mirror the prejudices of the author. You know the type of thing – our policies were too right wing, our policies were too left wing, our policies were too centrist, etc. Not very enlightening. So, to get a more balanced view, I turned to Lynton Crosby. I appreciate that’s […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Labour is in “mortal danger” – “we need to save it again”, says Peter Mandelson

    Labour is in “mortal danger” – “we need to save it again”, says Peter Mandelson

    Peter Mandelson has argued that Labour is in “mortal danger” . In an article in the Financial Times (£), the former cabinet minister and Labour campaigns director has warned against a Jeremy Corbyn victory. If the Islington North MP wins the leadership election, “that would be a very bad outcome for anyone who cares about fairness in our society or Britain’s place in the world”, Mandelson writes. Mandelson has called for a tightening of the rules over the leadership election […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Attracting people who didn’t vote at the last election is key to winning in 2020, say LabourList readers

    Attracting people who didn’t vote at the last election is key to winning in 2020, say LabourList readers

    In recent weeks there has been building concern from some over who has been deemed eligible to vote in the leadership election. Under new rules, members of the public can sign up as party ‘supporters’ for £3, this buys them a vote in the leadership election. However, it’s been reported that some Conservative and other non-Labour supporters have been given a vote. Labour say they have a vigorous vetting process to weed such people out. Yet some Labour supporters and […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit