Labour can be architects of change before 2015

November 26, 2012 10:56 am

Author:

Tags:

Share this Article

The Labour Party’s purpose is to create and lead change. Not for its own sake, but change in line with the progressive passions and priorities that brought us in to our movement. That is why we are a party which restlessly seeks government, the lever by which we can deliver our goals. But we must not be mistaken in thinking that because we are out of office today we are totally without power. As politicians and political activists we can pressurise and persuade to change regulation, legislation, culture or practice. Politics may be unpopular, but it is the principal means by which we can exert influence on the issues we care about.

For that reason earlier this year Labour wrote to major employers throughout the country with a simple but potentially meaningful proposition – to offer veterans a guaranteed interview for appropriate vacancies. 22 companies, including o2, John Lewis and Wickes, agreed to increase support for service-leavers seeking work. This was not a guaranteed job, but a foot in the door. The scheme, the Veterans’ Interview Programme (VIP), was launched on 4th July and since then many other businesses and agencies have expressed an interest.

Our motive was rooted in the knowledge that while our country is brilliant at turning civilians in to soldiers we are not good enough at turning soldiers in to civilians. We wanted to increase opportunities for those who fight for their country to start a new life on their return, easing the transition from military to civilian life and enabling veterans to provide for a family or simply put food on the table.  Skills learnt in the Armed Forces can make a hugely positive contribution to business and we wanted to break down the dual barriers of access to employment and employers’ perceptions of veterans which can be misunderstood.

For some time I have been talking to DWP about the scheme and today the DWP is rolling VIP out nationally. All employers will be able to register through Jobcentre Plus and when veterans seek work they will be directed to participating businesses by advisers. Jobcentre Plus will help employers implement the programme and veterans who could benefit will be sought out. This is potentially a significant policy shift which could help the lives of thousands of veterans at a challenging time of low growth and mass redundancies from the Forces.

I know some readers may wince at such praise for a government Department overseeing a painful programme of cuts to essential welfare support. But our anger at the social hurt caused by current DWP policy can sit alongside a recognition that it is a matter of all-party consensus that those who return from the frontline, including Afghanistan, should be shown more respect than be asked to join the back of the dole queue. If Labour can influence change for the better we should do so, which is why we have persuaded DWP to make VIP a national scheme.

One Nation Labour is rooted in the belief that that we must share prosperity, give everyone a stake in society and defend the institutions which bind us. The Armed Forces Covenant is the embodiment of one nation politics, protecting those who protect our country, ensuring they suffer no disadvantage as a result of service and recognising that the Armed Forces are central to our national character just as they are our national security. Labour has a strong track record of supporting Forces’ employment – Jobcentre Plus has a national network of Armed Forces Champions thanks to the last Labour Government.  Today’s announcement builds on this and shows that respect and reward for the service community is at the heart of One Nation Labour.

It is important we take action now not just because of the challenges facing UK veterans but because it will be harder to persuade the nation we are agents of change in 2015 if we do not demonstrate today our desire and ability to turn ambitions in to realities. Labour can be a constructive force for change, whether through opposition against or co-operation with the Government, as policy-makers in our Councils or as community activists.

A national VIP scheme can be a great Labour legacy achieved from Opposition. The more such achievements we seek to build from Opposition the more likely we are to be able to build a legacy from government.

Jim Murphy is the Shadow Secretary of State for Defence

  • http://twitter.com/KulganofCrydee Kulgan of Crydee

    Whilst the One Nation is just soundbiting, the Veterans’ Interview Programme (VIP) goes someway to help those who served this country willing to defend it & its’ interests with their lives if necessary. I suppose I should declare an interest being a 22 year veteran myself. A great example of how a good idea should be received whether in Government or in Opposition.

Latest

  • News Reynolds: re-elect the Tories and average house prices could be 13 times the average wage

    Reynolds: re-elect the Tories and average house prices could be 13 times the average wage

    Emma Reynolds – Shadow Minister for Housing - will today warn voters that another five years of a Conservative government could be disastrous for Britain’s housing crisis. The fifth instalment of The Choice, the Labour leaderships’ series of speeches over the summer, Reynolds will reveal new figures that show if current trends that have emerged under the Tory government were to continue until 2020, a housing gap the equivalent of three cities the size of Birmingham would open up and the average house […]

    Read more →
  • Comment As the PPC in Iain Duncan Smith’s constituency, Ed has taught me two important lessons

    As the PPC in Iain Duncan Smith’s constituency, Ed has taught me two important lessons

    Ed Miliband has tackled the issue of his perceived image problem. Rather than embarrassingly excuse himself or convince the public he is something he is not, he has embraced his own persona, accepting it in order to extinguish the ongoing media analysis of who he is rather than what he stands for. This move shows courage, political prowess and most of all, it’s set the stage for next year’s election to be about policy rather than personalities. I cannot tell […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Cameron condemned for immigration PR stunt

    Cameron condemned for immigration PR stunt

    Yesterday, David Cameron offered an ominous threat to people who are deemed to be ‘illegal immigrants’, when he said “we will find you and make sure you are sent back to the country you came from.”  Who knew he meant this literally?  This announcement was worrying enough in itself – such a threat demonises immigrants and ignores the many reasons people might be in the UK illegally – but the PM decided to take his intimidating statement one step further. Cameron, […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Cameron dropped Gove, now Labour must drop his policies

    Cameron dropped Gove, now Labour must drop his policies

    Fireworks, champagne corks popping and rare mashups of Hallelujah and Ode to Joy were heard echoing down the corridors from staffrooms across England and Wales in response to the news that Michael Gove had at long last been sacked as Secretary of State for Education. Forget the unpopularity of his policies, his mishandling of the scandal over suspected attempts to indoctrinate Birmingham’s children to Islamic extremism or his inability to work with anyone from teachers to the Home Secretary – […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour outraised the Tories in 2013, but financial worries still remain

    Labour outraised the Tories in 2013, but financial worries still remain

    The Electoral Commission’s annual report of party finances has been published for 2013, and it turns out that Labour actually raised more money than the Conservatives last year – by almost £8 million. Labour raised £33.4m, while the Tories raised just £25.4m. As George Eaton points out, over at the New Statesman, much of Labour’s advantage comes from short money (the money opposition parties receive from the state). However, this only amounts to £6.9m, meaning Labour still raised roughly an […]

    Read more →