Tax Justice: The deeds to a new United Nation

November 15, 2012 6:06 pm

By Mark Donne

Apart from a flag, a Queen, or a team, what consolidates our nation state? The Olympic Games demonstrated that in this regard our most immediate force is sport, and older generations are understandably more likely to feel glued by a Monarch unchanged by the special nightmares of the 20th century.

Other collective activities are seen by many as bureaucratic abstractions; even general election voting is for too many quite detached from living reality. And then there is tax; the single biggest thing we do together.

Regardless of whether it is seen as an important contribution, a minor annoyance or a necessary evil, tax is the transaction we all make to live in a society of efficiency, compassion, security and safety. Without it you have none one of those things; nor incidentally do you have an Olympic games, and you most certainly don’t have 29 gold medals. It is not hyperbole to say every single payment or wage-slip deduction is a red blood cell to the lifeblood of our modern civilisation.

Conditions for the transformation of the perception of tax were naturally set by the 2008 financial crisis and subsequent political decisions to foot its bill by cutting the state. Now that such a squeeze is being imposed, Britons (apparently) acquiesce to the siege mentality but impulsively look around them, just to check everyone else is being constricted too. Via the brilliant lenses of Private Eye, The Tax Justice Network and campaign groups like UK Uncut, they have gasped at a very British problem.

Half of all of the international tax havens frenetically depleting sovereign treasuries are Britain or British. That is to say they are “Overseas Territories” such as the Cayman Islands or British Virgin Islands, or “Crown Dependencies” such as Jersey, all flying the Union Jack, singing “god save the queen” and acting as satellite jurisdictions. Any suggestion that they are independent of the UK government is manifestly absurd.

At home, 98 of the top FTSE 100 companies use tax havens. Far from being an exotic aspect of the financial services system utilised by a few “morally repellent” individuals or companies, the use of these scattered islands, seemingly outside of territorial or political control is utterly widespread in corporate and wealthy circles.

Put simply, as the country over time has become more economically reliant on the City – “the head office” of UK financial services and indeed global finance – the City has been able to heavily influence a domestic tax system wholly receptive, even moulded to industrialised abuse. Or as a recent Times editorial put it: “The British tax system is unfair. It charges the vast majority of people the basic rate of income tax, and expects them to pay. It asks a minority to pay higher rates of tax, and then invites them to avoid it.”

And despite all protestations to the contrary and the theatrical language of moral outrage, the problem is getting worse. In the most recent budget the coalition government legislatively increased the capacity for trans-nationals companies to avoid billions in tax, niche UK and offshore based tax law firms are increasing in scale at a decent rate, just as the expertise of HMRC to rumble them shrinks.

Indeed, far from challenging tax havens, Conservative Treasurer Lord Fink recently suggested we directly emulate or compete with them, as opposed to merely allowing our financial centre to control them. Fink is in good company; tory MP for the City Mark Field has continually defended tax havens, tory peer and former tory MP Lord Blencathra is the current lobbyist to the UK of the Cayman Islands and far from any moral red lines, on a recent visit to the Cayman Islands a Foreign Office Minister announced that – despite the Island being described by the New York Times as “a tax-free home for 9,253 hedge funds”“this UK Government is proud of the achievements of the Cayman Islands”. The Minister was subsequently replaced in a reshuffle that saw a Conservative former tax avoidance lawyer promoted to the Treasury.

This vivid injustice transcends party politics and governments of all colours have failed to counter it. Action or inaction is very simply a question of political will and as such a fundamental challenge to any political party that seeks to unite and govern Britain. In the US, small business networks have begun to protest at the chronically unfair market within which they try and compete, with 9 out of 10 small holdings saying the apparent freedom of multi-nationals to offshore tax disadvantages them. The same movement could and should emerge here.

There is no rowing back from this. The luxury of ignorance has evaporated for big business and government alike. Between them, either by volition, law or international convention, tax havens and tax abuse must stop. Coherent, credible steps have been presented which must be urgently considered. Any senior politician that fails to grasp this new reality underestimates the depth of hostility live in the country, and can hold no torch to any notion of patriotic duty.

  • Dave Postles

    Fink by name, fink by nature.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    “It is not hyperbole to say every single payment or wage-slip deduction
    is a red blood cell to the lifeblood of our modern civilisation.”

    No… it is hyperbole.

    Would that it were so, granted taxes are necessary but there’s far too many examples of taxes wasted or poorly spent for it to be true.

Latest

  • Comment Labour’s Lessons from a Sikh Wedding Season

    Labour’s Lessons from a Sikh Wedding Season

    There’s been a fair bit written about the Sikh community in the nationals in the last few days in relation to Cameron’s political appointments to the Lords and some criticism for Labour for not having any representation from the 700,000 strong Sikh community in its Westminster ranks. Personally I don’t think there’s anything to gain in attacking Cameron for making more diverse appointments, even if the guy may not be as entrenched in the Sikh community as was claimed and […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Where does Labour really stand on a “Health Tax”?

    Where does Labour really stand on a “Health Tax”?

    The front page of today’s FT suggests that the Labour leadership is considering a “Health Tax” as a means of paying for the NHS, reporting(£): “Ed Miliband is to put the NHS at the centre of Labour’s election campaign and is considering an earmarked “health tax” or exempting the health service from deficit reduction to prove that he can deliver a better service. Mr Miliband believes the NHS is rising up the list of voters’ concerns but wants to offer […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Miliband calls for “overarching inquiry into child abuse” – and repeats call for Shaun Wright to step down

    Miliband calls for “overarching inquiry into child abuse” – and repeats call for Shaun Wright to step down

    Ed Miliband has released a statement this morning on the Rotherham child abuse scandal, in which he re-iterates calls for Shaun Wright to resign as South Yorkshire PCC. However, Miliband has gone further today, calling for an “overarching inquiry into child abuse” to examine what went wrong not just in Rotherham, but “in different institutions, in different parts of the country and stretching across different decades”. Here’s the statement in full: This week’s report into the child abuse scandal in […]

    Read more →
  • Comment If a young person’s opinion falls into the political sphere, does it make a sound?

    If a young person’s opinion falls into the political sphere, does it make a sound?

    There’s a lot of talk around the Party at the moment about ‘Generation Y.’ I suppose I fit into that category, although I don’t think I’ve ever used it to describe myself. Gen Y or whatever, what’s become clear to me over the years is that I’m one of the weirder ones. I’ve worked since the age of 16, doing jobs from working behind a pharmacy counter to fundraising in a call centre to translating for a construction company. I’ve […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Why rural areas need free buses

    Why rural areas need free buses

    To have a fully functioning society, bus services in rural areas should be free of charge. For young people seeking employment, education or entertainment, the unwell needing to visit and be visited in hospitals or the elderly wanting to break the loneliness of isolation, public transport is essential. If governments don’t want to spend money on services in rural areas, they should at least provide the means for people who live there to get to them in urban areas. Regular […]

    Read more →