Knocking on a Locked Door – Regulating Bailiffs

4th December, 2012 6:02 pm

It’s well known and understood that if you owe someone money they can arrange for bailiffs to seize property belonging to you and for them to sell it to cover the debt.  What is less well-known is that there are different sorts of bailiff, and indeed enforcement officers, and that the law relating to debt collection is complex and often centuries old.

Each year around four million cases are passed to bailiffs with a value estimated at over £1billion.  Non-payment of council tax meant last year there were almost 3 million summons issued with around half of the cases being passed to bailiffs for collection. That’s a lot of people coming in to contact with bailiffs.

But what is a bailiff and broadly what can they do?  Well there are County Court bailiffs and High Court enforcement officers.  Then there are Certificated bailiffs and private non-certified bailiffs.  Generally bailiffs must only use peaceful means of entry – that doesn’t mean pushing past someone.  Then again, in certain circumstances a bailiff can break in.  Bailiffs can seize goods – but not all goods.  Clear?

Complaints are not uncommon, indeed last year alone there were almost 25,000 private bailiff cases referred to the Citizen’s Advice Bureaux, but who to complain to depends upon the type of bailiff and the nature of the complaint.  Moreover, while parts of the enforcement industry are strictly regulated others have only informal regulation through trade associations.  And while some businesses carefully train their staff, others have, shall we say, a less rigorous approach.

There are also sadly too many cases of bailiffs acting aggressively and incorrectly applying these assorted laws.  Anecdotes and documented cases abound about bailiffs clamping vehicles used for work, seizing children’s toys, tricking their way in to a property, claiming there have criminal warrants, and ignoring the cases where people have specific vulnerabilities.

And then there are the fees. It is widely accepted that the current fee structure is complex with each enforcement power having its own costs arrangements.

Still not clear?

Well, it’s hardly surprising.  Bailiffs are covered by a variety of laws, secondary legislation and common law.  This complexity isn’t good for the debtor, the creditor or even the bailiff.  Trying to train a bailiff must be as big a nightmare as knowing if the bailiff at your door is acting correctly.

A big part of the problem is the long history of amending and adding to the legislation governing bailiffs.  More recently an attempt was made in the Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 to sort out this mess, but much of the act as it relates to bailiffs didn’t come in to force before the 2010 General Election.

The current government published updated voluntary guidance in the form of the National Standards for Enforcement Agents which sets out behaviour to be expected from bailiffs.  However, critics have pointed out that there are only six small changes from the original document and this clearly doesn’t constitute a major reform of the law.

On 17 February 2012 the government issued a consultation paper, “Transforming bailiff action”, which outlined the reforms being proposed, many of which would be achieved by implementing Part 3 of the 2007 Act.  The consultation closed on 14 May 2012 and yet here we are some six months later still waiting for the government’s response – or better still some legislative proposals.

So we are left asking why given the confused mess that is our bailiff system nothing has been forthcoming.  It can’t be because of the coalition’s rule about not bringing in new laws unless old ones can be removed, given the long list of laws that could be swept away by simplifying the law.  Could it be the workload at the Ministry?  Well observers only need to look at the paucity of legislation before parliament to see that there are opportunities to act.

An amendment has been tabled to the Crime and Courts Bill, currently being discussed in the House of Lords, to be debated today (4 December). It’s a start but is unlikely to provide the solution – what we need is a proper law to bring all the various laws, guides and systems up to date and in one place.

I would hope that given the economic nightmare that is driving more people into the arms of debt collection the government would move swiftly to respond to its consultation and set out a clear framework so if the knock on the door comes it is from an enforcement officer who knows the law, has had proper training, is registered and regulated, and then maybe people can concentrate on the underlying issue of indebtedness, not a system that is fatally flawed.

Rob Flello MP is the Shadow Justice Minister with responsibility for bailiffs

Amendment 111 to the Crime and Courts Bill in the name of Baroness Meacher and Lord Beecham will be debated in the House of Lords today (Tuesday 4th December)

  • http://www.facebook.com/john.seers John Seers

    A very good subject to highlight. A bit of a mystery why they are not very strictly regulated.

  • http://twitter.com/ian_norris เลи и๏яяเร

    Why wasnt the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007 process completed you had 3 years? what stopped pt3 in Nov 2008?

  • http://www.facebook.com/jim.crowder2 Jim Crowder

    There’s a lot of stuff that’s suddenly happened since spring 2010, hasn’t it? Was this not sufficiently important before then? What changes in the law have happened since then to make this so important?

    There seems to be a focus on people who don’t pay their bills and debts. Nothing about people who are owed money and never get it back. Shouldn’t we have a discussion about those victims too?

  • http://www.facebook.com/jim.crowder2 Jim Crowder

    There’s a lot of stuff that’s suddenly happened since spring 2010, hasn’t it? Was this not sufficiently important before then? What changes in the law have happened since then to make this so important?

    There seems to be a focus on people who don’t pay their bills and debts. Nothing about people who are owed money and never get it back. Shouldn’t we have a discussion about those victims too?

Latest

  • Video Does David Cameron know which football team he supports?

    Does David Cameron know which football team he supports?

    David Cameron claims he’s a big fan of Aston Villa. Last week, he even tweeted to congratulate them on their shock victory over Liverpool in the FA Cup Semi Final: Congratulations to @AVFCOfficial on reaching the #FACup final. A tremendous achievement. — David Cameron (@David_Cameron) April 19, 2015 And yet in this video from Sky News, he suggests he’s a West Ham fan: Now they both play in the same colours. But what football fan gets confused about what team […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour candidate receives voicemail death threat

    Labour candidate receives voicemail death threat

    The election campaign in Scotland has been unsavoury – but it has taken its worst turn yet with the news that a Labour candidate has received a death threat. Glasgow Central candidate Anas Sarwar – a Shadow DFID Minister and a key part of the pro-union campaign last year as Scottish Labour’s then Deputy Leader – received the threat by voicemail earlier this month. The message (which you can hear over at the Daily Record), says: “You dirty f*****g scummy […]

    Read more →
  • News Scotland Murphy launches Scottish Labour’s workplace manifesto

    Murphy launches Scottish Labour’s workplace manifesto

    Scottish Labour today launched their workplace manifesto, concentrating on protecting and extending workers’ right. Leader Jim Murphy used the opportunity to highlight the party’s pledges on raising the minimum wage and abolishing zero hour contracts. You can see the manifesto here. Speaking at the launch this afternoon, Murphy focussed in particular on the different parties’ approaches to zero hour contracts. He said: “This is a plan for the workers, left living temporary lives, on zero hours contracts waiting for the […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Umunna wants Michael Heseltine’s input if Labour win in May

    Umunna wants Michael Heseltine’s input if Labour win in May

    Chuka Umunna, Shadow Business Secretary, has said he hopes Michael Heseltine will advise Labour if the party win in May. In an interview with the Guardian, Umunna said the former Conservative deputy PM and minister, who was responsible for urban policy under Thatcher and Major (in his capacity as Environment Secretary) is a “visionary.” Umunna explained: “There is no denying it, a lot of people in the Labour movement are quite inspired by what he’s done in rejuvenating cities and regions. […]

    Read more →
  • News Polling Labour take 12 point lead in the capital

    Labour take 12 point lead in the capital

    The latest YouGov survey for the Evening Standard is out and Labour are still ahead of the Tories in London by a significant amount: they’ve got a 12 point lead. This is down by one point since the YouGov last did this poll in March, however it does look like the party are set to win at least two thirds of their target seats in the capital. The paper’s constituency analysis shows Labour taking between 8 and 10 of the […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit