A debate which will have an effect on everyone in the UK

January 15, 2013 3:48 pm

Rarely does Parliament stop to consider issues as fundamental as the future composition of our country, but this afternoon in the House of Commons that is exactly what MPs are being asked to do.

The title of this afternoon’s debate – on the draft Scotland Act (Modification of Schedule 5) Order 2013 –isn’t likely to inspire much interest among anyone except the most hardened of constitutional lawyers. However, go beyond the title and into the substance and this is actually a debate which will have an effect on every person living not just in Scotland, but across the whole of the United Kingdom.

This afternoon’s debate is the result of the agreement signed by David Cameron and Alex Salmond in October and will see power over the “Union of England and Scotland” passed from the UK to the Scottish Parliament.

It’s a move which we support. Like them, we want to see a referendum which is “made in Scotland”, with the terms and detail of the referendum set through a Bill in the Scottish Parliament. This is important so that the process and result of the referendum is wholly accepted by all sides. Putting the responsibility for the referendum in the hands of the Scottish Government and the Scottish Parliament means that no one, including the SNP, can question the result. In the words of the agreement that was signed by both the UK and Scottish Government, the referendum will:

“deliver a…decisive expression of the views of the people of Scotland and a result that everyone will respect.”

In the Labour Party, we should take pride in the fact that the Scottish Parliament is being charged with this responsibility. It is worth remembering that in 1998, when Labour created the Scottish Parliament, many people (including a large number of Conservative MPs) said it would never work. With this agreement, we see another step in the evolution of Scottish democracy. The new powers also places a high responsibility on Scottish Government Ministers to rise to the occasion and act not just in the interests of partisan advantage, but in the interests of the whole country.

For those of us who have always seen constitutional change as a means to an end, and not an end in itself, this afternoon’s debate means that we might now be able to move further beyond process and into the substance of what affects Scottish people day in and day out. The debate ahead on the future of Scotland has to be more than an accountancy exercise. The tone and tenor of it has to match the high aspirations that people on all sides have for an event of this significance.

As we have been doing from the outset, we will continue to grasp the nettle and deal with the difficult and challenging issues that Scotland has to face with rigour and honesty. It has to be a debate that meets the ambition of the generations of Labour advocates for devolution. In the words of Donald Dewar, Scotland’s first First Minister:

“Introspection will not solve our problems. Nor will preoccupation with constitutional point-scoring. Responding to the needs of the Scottish people is what matters.”

For those of us who have spent a life time in Scottish politics, this is an important opportunity to settle this question once and for all. When Parliament’s debate concludes this afternoon, we will be one step closer to that end.

Margaret Curran MP, Shadow Secretary of State for Scotland

  • uglyfatbloke

    Not the most inspiring of debates really…the gnats are conspicuous by their absence in the chamber and Ian Davidson and Eleanor Laing have taken the opportunity to deliver lengthways doses of snide – and not very honest – party whingeing. A fine demonstration of sheer uselessness by both sides.

  • uglyfatbloke

    Unbelievably, the debate got worse as it went on..and on…and on….
    Wishart actually made a fair point about the undesirable tendency toward denigration (which did n’t stop him chucking the odd brick himself) but was utterly denigrated for doing so. The best contributions were from Lazarowicz and Robertson – let’s have more of the same.
    Thankfully, very few people listen to such debates so Davidson, Laing and McNeill etc. probably have n’t done all that much damage, but we really can’t go on like this, it’s offensive and counter-productive..

  • http://www.facebook.com/jim.crowder2 Jim Crowder

    The only reason I can think of to refuse the people of Scotland a referendum to determine their future is that they may not deliver the right answer. Why should we be scared of the people being wrong?

  • http://twitter.com/andrew_graeme Andrew Smith

    Quite possibly one of the poorest debates I’ve seen and based on one of the most important issues. Please be more positive and don’t let Sarwar say frankly silly things (such as comparing Salmond to a dictatorship) or Davidson serve up such bile. The current tone will not inspire people to become active in the Labour Party or Better Together.

Latest

  • News Don’t underestimate Ed Miliband, David Davis warns Tories

    Don’t underestimate Ed Miliband, David Davis warns Tories

    David Davis has sent out a warning to his Conservative colleagues to underestimate Labour leader Ed Miliband at their peril. The Tory backbencher, who was beaten to the leadership in 2005 by David Cameron, told the Hull Daily Mail that just because “the media don’t like him” doesn’t mean Miliband won’t end up prime minister next year. “The media don’t like him and that translates into people picking up the same attitude. But I’m not as disparaging about Miliband as […]

    Read more →
  • News De Piero: Tories may outspend us, but we’ll out-campaign them

    De Piero: Tories may outspend us, but we’ll out-campaign them

    This week’s fundraising figures may show that the Conservatives will be able to outspend Labour in the run up to next year’s general election, but a fall in Tory membership means that we’ll be able to “out-body” them, according to Gloria De Piero. In an interview with The Guardian today, the Shadow Women and Equalities Minister explains how she is launching a campaign to connect with disengaged voters. Along with Deputy Chair of the Labour Party Jon Ashworth, De Piero […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Poll finds half of voters would pay more tax to fund NHS

    Poll finds half of voters would pay more tax to fund NHS

    Almost half of all voters would be willing to pay more tax if it meant funding the NHS, a new poll has found.   According to the ComRes survey in today’s Guardian, 49% of people would pay more if the money was going directly to the health service, while only 33% are opposed to the idea. 18% said they did not know. This is not the first indication that the general public are open to the idea of tax rises if […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The case for intervention: the Labour Party needs to find its feet in the post-Iraq era

    The case for intervention: the Labour Party needs to find its feet in the post-Iraq era

    In the decade since the invasion of Iraq many liberal societies have struggled with its legacy and how to move forward with foreign policy. The international community faces it’s next significant challenge; Isis, Kurdistan and Iraq. However, I cannot agree with Maya Goodfellow’s piece from earlier this week. To say that the foreign policy position of previous Labour governments has ‘put far too many peoples’ party membership cards at serious risk’ is not a good enough reason to allow hundreds of […]

    Read more →
  • News Tory ministers urge Osborne to cap rail fare rises

    Tory ministers urge Osborne to cap rail fare rises

    The Evening Standard have reported that high-level Tory minister are pressuring Chancellor George Osborne to cap average rail fare increases next year so that they don’t exceed inflation. In January, fail fares could rise up to nine times more than the average wage increase. It seems many Tories are worried that public discontent over such rapidly rising rail prices could manifest itself at the general election in May. In response, Patrick McLoughlin Secretary of State for Transport will allegedly lobby […]

    Read more →