Chuka is a Blairite? Since when…?

January 22, 2013 12:05 pm

In the last two weeks I’ve read several articles in national newspapers stating (in passing and never with any clarification) that Shadow Business Secretary Chuka Umunna is a “Blairite”.

Usually this description has come in the form of fairly transparent and clumsy briefing (i.e. “Come back David Miliband or Chuka might end up being leader”) but it’s still worth questioning the terminology at play here.

If Umunna is a Blairite, then he’s certainly arrived there in an unusual way (and, considering the passing of New Labour, at an unusual time). There’s certainly no hint of it in his time before entering Parliament. Before being elected, Chuka was best known as a prominent member of Compass – no Blairites they – and as a close ally of Jon Cruddas (who worked for Blair but has also been critical of much of his later record).

But perhaps Umunna has had a change of heart? When I interviewed him last year he was keen to praise Peter Mandelson (as well as Lord Heseltine). Perhaps that was the sign of some nascent Blairism that some have detected?

Yet if Umunna is a Blairite then so surely is Ed Miliband. Umunna has been inextricably linked with the Labour leader since 2010, backing him in the leadership election, serving a few months as his PPS and staying in ideological lockstep ever since. (Indeed, Ed Miliband could be said to be more of a Blairite than Umunna, and with verifiable proof – after all, Ed was seen as one of the most Blair-friendly members of Team Gordon, and is a former Vice-Chair of New Labour pressure group Progress.)

What attempts to brand Umunna a “Blairite” shows is that “Blairite” is an increasingly redundant term. It is nearly six years since Blair stood down as Labour leader, and no-one would suggest that we are still in the same political paradigm post-financial crash. Blairism is part of the Labour Party’s history now (and necessarily as a doctrine that won three general elections, is a part of the party’s DNA) – but it’s no longer an adequate way of describing what people are (if it ever was – often it was thrown around in the party as an insult).

I learned that a few weeks ago when I described some members of the Shadow Cabinet as Blairites. Within minutes of posting I realised how nebulous and inadequate the term was, so I’ve resolved to try and avoid using it too. I’ll lock it in the special geeky Labour Party words bin (only for use on special occasions) – and I suggest for the sake of clarity, you do too.

  • AlanGiles

    Yet if Umunna is a Blairite then so surely is Ed Miliband.”

    Got it in one.

    “What attempts to brand Umunna a “Blairite” shows is that “Blairite”
    is an increasingly redundant term. It is nearly six years since Blair
    stood down as Labour leader, and no-one would suggest that we are still
    in the same political paradigm post-financial crash. Blairism is part of
    the Labour Party’s history now”

    But it’s a sort of “he’s dead but he won’t lie down” situation. We still have Blair-worshippers writing for and commentating on LL (just a week or so ago Marchant was yet again doing his “Tone was right on Iraq” rubbish). Blair himself minces back into the limelight from time to time to bask in his Olympic “legacy” last June. Prior to that in March he had appointed a new press secretary at enoromous cost to assist his “re-engagement” with domestic politics. Luckilly for us, the sign on the door still says vacant rather than engaged

    As for Umunna, he would perhaps be best advised to ration his press quotes. last week for example he told us that “people were upset” they couldn’t use their HMV vouchers (they can from today of course it seems Hilco have ridden to the rescue), but is it really necessary to make such banal comments?. Most of the shadow cabinet try to remain mute and invisible, Umunna is quite the opposite, but much of what he says isn’t worth saying or so obvious as not to need saying. He is by no means the worst of the bunch – far from it, but a bit of circumspection would not come amiss.

    • Chilbaldi

      Agree with you on the rent-a-quote point, and the banality of some comments.
      But re the Blairism stuff… only amongst hardened lefties would you hear this conversation. The rest of the country doesn’t give a stuff, honestly.

    • PaulHalsall

      Umunna is sometimes a bit too smooth, but I expect to see him as Labour leader someday. Charisma is, obviously, not a major requirement for British politicians. Thatcher acquired; Blair pretended to it; but few of the the current lot could make any such appeal. Umunna clearly is in a different league.

  • Amber_Star

    It’s time for Brown & Blair to get with the programme: They need to ‘kiss & make-up’! One Party may not be a requirement for being a One Nation government but it would surely help!

  • trotters1957

    The term Social Democrat is the most accurate term but is seen as too close to the old Gang of Four and the Libdems to be used.
    In reality the modern Labour Party is a Social democratic party no longer a socialist party.

Latest

  • News Scotland have voted No to independence, say LabourList readers

    Scotland have voted No to independence, say LabourList readers

    In a few hours time, we will find out that Scotland has voted against independence – according to LabourList readers, anyway. 77% of those who took our survey this week said they thought that the outcome of today’s referendum would be a No vote. Despite polls have closed in over the past fortnight, our readers are confident that Scots will have chosen to preserve the Union. 23% think that the result will be in favour of Yes. Only two polls in […]

    Read more →
  • News Lift cap on borrowing so councils can build – say Labour PPCs, councillors and AMs

    Lift cap on borrowing so councils can build – say Labour PPCs, councillors and AMs

    A group of London-based Prospective Parliamentary Candidates, councillors and London Assembly Members have written an open letter (published in the Guardian), calling on party leadership to go further in their policy commitments when it comes to building houses. Although the letter praises Ed’s pledge that the next Labour government “will build 200,000 homes a year by 2020″, the cohort which include urge leadership to commit to lifting what they deem the “arbitrary cap [placed on councils] on borrowing to build”. […]

    Read more →
  • News Are Labour going to make the NHS the focal point of the 2015 campaign?

    Are Labour going to make the NHS the focal point of the 2015 campaign?

    Earlier this week, a poll found that Labour hold an 18-point lead over the Tories as the most trusted party on the NHS – the only topic voters consider a “major issue” that sees a Labour lead. The NHS being a crucial issue of the Scottish referendum, with both sides accusing the other of lying. Many of today’s votes rest on whether they trust Yes Scotland or Better Together’s claims about the health service. Now reports say that Labour are considering […]

    Read more →
  • Comment We stand up for human value – we proudly defend the Human Rights Act

    We stand up for human value – we proudly defend the Human Rights Act

    If you’re part of the Labour Party, or hold any similar values, you will certainly share the absolute belief in respect and dignity for everyone. I don’t think anyone in our movement, with our principles, would disagree. And so, with those common values, we are entirely right to stand up, loud and proud, for the Human Rights Act. The publication this week of Human Rights: Reflections on the 1998 Act by Jonathan Cooper in Stephen Hockman’s Law Reform 2015 (with […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Scotland Friendship and solidarity must prevail, as the fog clears

    Friendship and solidarity must prevail, as the fog clears

    The air hangs thick this morning with the referendum. Last night a deep fog rolled down across Edinburgh, but in reality it is the campaign which has blotted the vision and stopped even the keenest of observers from seeing what lies just a few footsteps ahead. The final days has provided one crucial clarification though – the No campaign is capable of great passion and powerful rhetoric. Mocked, endlessly criticised, a reputation dragged through the muck. Despite it all – […]

    Read more →