It’s time for truly Equal Marriage

6th March, 2013 11:27 am

The campaign for equal marriage has arguably been as much a fight against religious privilege and the grip of the churches on our democracy, as it has been about equality. It has been illuminating to see how wholly opposed the heterosexual male leaders of the biggest religions in this country have been to the principle of marriage equality.

Not content with the Tory-led Government bending over backwards to accommodate their demands for wide exemptions from the proposed new law on equal marriage, the main religions have lobbied hard against any reform at all. They have been determined to deny same-sex couples any access to marriage, even – outrageously – to civil, secular marriage. The strength of the diverse coalition of people and organisations standing up for equal rights for LGBT people in the face of those powerful opponents has been remarkable and wonderful to be part of.

Humanist groups have long campaigned for equality in marriage law and see the current reforms as overdue but very welcome. However, we want to see more reform to create real equality – and that would mean taking the opportunity now to legalise humanist marriage in England and Wales.

In its powerful support for equal marriage, Labour has quite rightly put the rights of same-sex couples as equal citizens at the heart of its arguments for reform of the marriage law. Yet even when Parliament passes the Bill, left unamended the marriage law will remain unequal and focused on religious rights. In effect, a double discrimination will be created for those with no religion, as no non-religious couple, gay or straight, will be able legally to marry in accordance with their beliefs as religious couples will.

We only need to look north across the border to see a far more equitable system. In Scotland humanist marriages have had legal status since 2005, and following a rocketing in demand for the non-religious ceremonies they are now more popular than Roman Catholic marriages.  When the Scots pass their legislation to allow same-sex marriage, that will mean that both same-sex and opposite-sex couples will have the choice of a religious, humanist or civil marriage.

There are some moves to tackle the inequality between Scotland, and England and Wales. In fact, an amendment with Labour and Liberal Democrat sponsors has been tabled to the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill to be considered by the Bill Committee in the next week, which would give humanist marriage legal status in England and Wales. In the other House, Labour Peer Lord Harrison awaits the Second Reading of his Private Members Bill to debate the same issue. We expect support from the Party for both those measures – in the last parliamentary session 43 Labour MPs signed an Early Day Motion in support of legal humanist marriage, and the issue has had support when it has been debated before in the Lords.

However, to put real pressure on the Government to challenge the status quo, to tackle the religious privilege inherent in the marriage law, to help to future-proof against the potential for double discrimination for non-religious couples, and to fight for real equality, One Nation Labour needs officially to make supporting legal change for humanist marriage part of its policy for progressive change.

Naomi Phillips is Chair of Labour Humanists

  • Alexwilliamz

    Really stretching that ‘one nation’ thing. I think I have now lost all track of what marriage is even meant to be or why anyone cares about whether they are married or not, at least what the hell the state has got to do with any form of marriage.

  • Alexwilliamz

    Really stretching that ‘one nation’ thing. I think I have now lost all track of what marriage is even meant to be or why anyone cares about whether they are married or not, at least what the hell the state has got to do with any form of marriage.

  • jaime taurosangastre candelas

    I really do not understand your “double-discrimination” remark.

    Precisely what is the difference between an agnostic or atheist couple who marry in a registry office, and a humanist couple who are the next in line? God is not involved in either ceremony, by the couples’ volition, and presumably both couples look on a religious couple marrying in a church as being fairy-believing fantasists?

    In all 3 cases, the law regards them as equally married, and from now on, it does not matter whether the 3 couples are mixed sex or same sex.

    What could possibly be more equal?

    If, on the other hand, your view is that humanist couples should be allowed to marry in church, your argument is not with the state, but with the churches, and they would probably feel aggrieved at being asked to marry a couple who do not believe in God as a superior being to humans.

    If you want the “razzmatazz” of a church wedding, the white dress and flowers, but don’t actually believe in God, you can always pretend, as so many church wedding couples do. It is only 45 minutes.

  • http://www.facebook.com/renie.anjeh1 Renie Anjeh

    I don’t see any problem. We are going to get gay marriage, which is brilliant and non-religious people can have civil marriage if they don’t want a religious marriage. What needs to happen now is to either abolish civil partnerships, or extend civil partnerships to straight couples. This should have been tackled in the Bill.

  • Pingback: Why Labour should support truly equal marriage | Labour Humanists()

Latest

  • Comment The empty, divisive mantra of “working people”

    The empty, divisive mantra of “working people”

    When David Cameron returned to Downing Street after visiting the Palace on May 8th, he lost no time in reminding the country that his manifesto was “a manifesto for working people”. This endlessly-repeated slogan of standing up for “working people” is worse than meaningless. It is a rhetorical trick designed to smooth the way for further savage welfare cuts. If the Labour Party wants to avoid fighting – and losing – another election on terms set by the Conservatives, it […]

    Read more →
  • Comment ‘Better regulation’ or a gangmaster’s dream? Cameron’s plans for EU regulatory reform need closer scrutiny

    ‘Better regulation’ or a gangmaster’s dream? Cameron’s plans for EU regulatory reform need closer scrutiny

    Of all Cameron’s requests from the EU, his call for regulatory reform has been one of the most specific, yet it has received little scrutiny outside the trade union movement. Indeed, of all the thousands of comments on the CBI’s call to promote EU membership published in the Guardian last week, it was difficult to spot any focused on Cameron’s right-wing spin on what in EU jargon is known as the ‘better regulation agenda’. In a rare example of Cameron providing meat on […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Working parents can’t rely on a government that gives with one hand and takes with the other

    Working parents can’t rely on a government that gives with one hand and takes with the other

    Ask any working parent about the challenges they face in managing work and family life and childcare is often the first thing they mention. The availability and crippling cost of childcare is a huge barrier to working families, and over the last five years the situation’s gotten worse. On David Cameron’s watch, registered childcare places have fallen by more than 40,000, and the cost of a nursery place for children over two has risen by more than a third. That’s […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Let’s get started – join me on Thursday

    Let’s get started – join me on Thursday

    Labour’s ground campaign in the lead-up to May 7th was bigger than ever before, with our activists engaging with over 5million people in the lead-up to May 7th. However, we now know that simply having those conversations wasn’t enough to deliver an overall Labour victory. While questions need to be asked about the national campaign, from the leadership down, it’s imperative that the​ voices of candidates and organisers in target seats​ ​are​ heard in our ongoing debate. The experience and knowledge of our people on […]

    Read more →
  • News “Wanting to make a profit doesn’t make you evil” – Stella Creasy, deputy leader hopeful, speaks on Labour and business

    “Wanting to make a profit doesn’t make you evil” – Stella Creasy, deputy leader hopeful, speaks on Labour and business

    Stella Creasy, deputy leadership candidate, has argued that Labour doesn’t just need to be pro-business, they need to be “of business.” She has said that to do this the party must have “more candidates and activists at all levels [of the party] with direct experience of business both big and small.” Creasy cited the likes of Labour MPs Toby Perkins, who was previously director of a social enterprise, and Victoria Groulef, who’s been described as a “self-made business woman”, as examples of the […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit