You are here: Home » News »

Labour announces campaign for “National Memorial” to commemorate Afghan war

April 25, 2013 1:52 pm

Tags:

Share this Article

The party have today called on the Government to “lead a national effort” to build a National War in commemoration of the war in Afghanistan, and the fatalities and injuries suffered by British Armed Forces.

Announcing the campaign, Shadow Defence Secretary Jim Murphy said:

“It is essential there is meaningful commemoration of our Forces’ painful sacrifice in Afghanistan. This must be a national memorial that the whole nation feels part of. The public should be involved from the start so that they can show their sympathy and solidarity. Everyone should have the chance to offer their ideas and insights so we get a truly brilliant memorial. I hope the Prime Minister will personally oversee the project. Those who give their lives will never be forgotten by their families, and it is right their names live publicly forever.”

Related posts:

  1. As Labour announces 3,500th children’s centre, join the campaign to protect Sure Start
  2. On Workers’ Memorial Day we remember the dead, but campaign to protect the living
  3. Afghan Presidential candidate Obama-ises his campaign
  4. Our leaders now recognise the Afghan folly
  5. Hoon warns against Afghan targets
Yarpp
  • AlanGiles

    A sacrifice, Murphy, that would not have needed to be made if Tony Blair hadn’t been so keen on being George Bush’s poodle and going off to war yet again. If only the soft politicians who make such decisions had to fight themselves, they would be a lot less keen on warfare.

    • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

      And the reprehensible Murphy will deliver more of the same* – if he gets the chance. At least, unlike previous disasters, we have been forewarned.

      * http://www.jimmurphymp.com/news-room/Speeches/news.aspx?p=1041435

    • jaime taurosangastre candelas

      With respect, Alan, are you not able to separate your views on Tony Blair, with having some respect and feeling for those who died in the service of their country?

      I completely support Jim Murphy’s idea. I hope that there is a national memorial to those soldiers who did not choose to go there, but went because their country sent them. We will never know, maybe some did leave the Army because of personal political opposition to the national policy to Afghanistan, and that is their right. Maybe some went, with misgivings. But those that did serve and die there should not be forgotten because the policy was possibly wrong.

      As for Afghanistan itself, my thoughts are that after 9/11, and the knowledge that Al Qaeda were hosted there by the Afghan Government, what did you expect the Americans to do? They behaved remarkably normally: gave the Afghans an ultimatum to eject Al-Qaeda, when they did not they evicted the Taliban Government and Al-Qaeda by force. Since then, they have been involved in a possibly “unwinnable” battle. If you look at the casualty numbers, it was only after the war in Iraq started in 2003- a completely separate matter – that the Taliban returned to fight in Afghanistan.

      I feel that Iraq was a battle unwisely entered into on a probably false premise, but that does not stop me from thinking that Afghanistan was a “just” intervention. And indeed, for the same reasons as in my second paragraph, I would also support a memorial to our soldiers who died in Iraq.

      • AlanGiles

        Jaime. I am not blaming the service personnel in any way whatsoever. They were only doing what they were ordered to do – thanks to that big girls blouse of an effette Prime Minister we had at the time – and Murphy is as war-minded as his master was.

        If it is left to the likes of Murphy, sadly there will be many more casualties in other parts of the world thanks to his determination to “intervene”

  • Daniel Speight

    Government and shadow defense ministers should be embedded in front line units for a minimum period of six months. Probably be good if prime ministers and opposition leaders were too. Maybe then they would be a bit more careful in the future, both in policy matters and of the troops’ safety.

Latest

  • News Ed Balls votes in the Commons dressed as Santa

    Ed Balls votes in the Commons dressed as Santa

    This year (as every other year), Ed Balls was appearing as Santa in Parliament for the Christmas party for the children of MPs and parliamentary staff. But this year he went one step further – voting in the chamber dressed as Santa. Photo courtesy of Pamela Nash MP (she’s on the right)

    Read more →
  • Featured Collins Review – opportunities to be seized and traps to be avoided

    Collins Review – opportunities to be seized and traps to be avoided

    By James Plaskitt

    Ray Collins has a tough assignment.  But, based on my consultations with party and trade union members across the West Midlands region over the last month, there are opportunities to be seized – as well as traps to be avoided. The risks are easily identified.  The party coffers may take a hit, as large trade union donations dwindle.  Too few trade unionists paying the levy will take up the membership offer.  The historic link between party and unions will weaken. […]

    Read more →
  • Comment PMQs Verdict: Flat, flat flat

    PMQs Verdict: Flat, flat flat

    By Mark Ferguson

    Ed Miliband and David Cameron both spoke in the Commons on Monday to pay tribute to the life and legacy of Nelson Mandela. They both then jumped on a flight to South Africa to attend his memorial service yesterday (selfies included) before flying back to do PMQs today. To be honest this might have been more enlightening if they’d dialed it in front South Africa, because they largely dialed it in from Westminster. This was flat, flat, flat. This was […]

    Read more →
  • News Sun Political Editor reacts to Stella Creasy’s question on Page 3 by talking about her clothes

    Sun Political Editor reacts to Stella Creasy’s question on Page 3 by talking about her clothes

    Today Stella Creasy used her question at PMQs to ask the PM if he would back the “No More Page 3″ campaign. This is how Tom Newton Dunn – Political Editor of the Sun – reacted to that. Stay classy Tom…

    Read more →
  • Comment Where is the vision for a Digital Britain?

    Where is the vision for a Digital Britain?

    By Chi Onwurah

    Digital Government without digital inclusion will be a return to a late 18th Century model of democracy within a narrow elite. The digital divide is growing, this Government’s abandonment of Labour’s Universal Broadband pledge, mishandling of Broadband rollout, and imposition of digital by default as a cost cutting rather than service improvement programme, together with growing economic inequality, the cost of living crisis  and the rise of Big Data and Cloud mean there is a real risk of a large disenfranchised and […]

    Read more →