Miliband’s end of term report – How’s he doing on “The 3 Ps”

July 19, 2013 10:44 am

The parliamentary term came juddering to an end yesterday. MPs have packed up their files and returned to their constituencies, holidays have been booked and passports searched for. There are now less than two years until the election, so with that in mind – how’s Ed Miliband doing?

Here’s his end of term report – this year focussing on the delivery on The Three Ps – Polling, Policies and Party:

Polling – the question is, which polling? At present it’s unclear whether Labour’s lead is in double digits or low single digits – if there’s a lead at all – as the polls leap around all over the place. Things are certainly in flux. But until a few months ago Labour was retaining a fairly solid lead in the polls and had been for over a year. That’s less true now. But of far more concern for Miliband personally are his troubling (and falling) personal ratings, with IPSOS MORI rating him as unpopular as William Hague was at a similar point in his party leadership tenure. Yet for Labour to be back ahead after such a hefty thumping three years ago is an achievement, although the lead looks a tad flimsy at the moment. GRADE – B-

Policies – what policies? No, that’s unfair – the party does now have a range of policies that have been unveiled over the last 12 months or so. The problem is that none of them are, so far, the kind of barnstorming, pledge-card adorning, attention grabbing ideas that the party probably needs. The compulsory job guarantee is a good idea though, as is aiming for full employment. And the party could do with talking about its “zero based budget review” far more often when under pressure on cuts/spending. Clearly there’s an agenda under the surface, but when will be see it? And what will it look like. I’d bet the house on a house building programme – but it hasn’t been announced. Yet. GRADE – C

Party – Until a few weeks ago, it might have been possible to argue that Ed Miliband didn’t really have a passion for party organisation. Sure, he cares hugely about the kind of organisation that Arnie Graf is trying to deliver across the country. And he brought us Refounding Labour, which although it ended up being a bit of a damp squib, was at least an attempt to change the party. But the passion Miliband had during the leadership election for doing Labour politics differently and changing the party fundamentally appeared to have fallen by the wayside. Until last week, when Ed Miliband decided to completely change the entire way the party is run, organised and funded. Quite the turnaround. Only Ray Collins knows how his review will end up squaring the circle on some of the messy issues surrounding party reform. But we now have to say – whatever we think of Ed’s plans – that he has been “brave”, and that he’s sure as hell going to have to be passionate about the minutiae of party organisation now GRADE – B+

Overall – Not a bad year for Miliband or the Labour Party by any stretch of the imagination, although it looks worse right now, following the events of Falkirk, the resignation of Tom Watson and everything that came after. But this last year has had it’s share of highs – notably The “One Nation” conference speech and the spate of by-election wins in November (particularly in Corby). Yet there have also been disappointments too – the County Council election results were unspectacular at best, and the party has yet to develop a strategy for dealing with UKIP more generally. With two years to go the party could be in a far worse position – but the position could be far stronger too. If everyone is still saying the same next year, start worrying. GRADE – B

  • Hugh

    ” Yet for Labour to be back ahead after such a hefty thumping three years ago is an achievement”

    It’s not an achievement at all – or at least not his. The Lib Dems polled 23% at the election; as soon as they went into a coalition with the Tories, they lost their left-wing voters. Before the end of 2010 they were down to about 10%, where they’ve stayed, and – not coincidentally – Labour were back up to about 40%. Miliband, after three years of austerity, has Labour polling lower than the day he took over.

    What’s the achievement?

    • aracataca

      Can you remind us? What Conservative Association are you a member of again?

      • Hugh

        Sure: I’m not. Was there something you actually disagreed with in my comment?

        • aracataca

          Really? Just a bog standard right wing troll then?

        • aracataca

          It was a lazy comment Hugh.You could try using the words ‘may’ and ‘could’ now and again.
          First: -A great sweeping but ultimately hollow statement -’The Lib Dems….. as they went into a coalition with the Tories, they lost their left-wing voters.’
          What all of them? Of course some of their left wing voters will have been retained and some Lib Dem voters may have gone to the Greens and the Tories etc.
          Second: ‘and – not coincidentally – Labour were back up to about 40%’. All (every single last one) of the new Labour voters were former Lib Dem voters were they?
          You’re just making baseless generalisations to suit your own prejudices.
          Besides as things stand Labour would have a majority of 84- I’d be happy with that.

          • Hugh

            I don’t think it was particularly lazy. It was a comment, not an essay. And it was a lot more insightful than your replies, including this one frankly.

          • aracataca

            Yet more baseless and unsupported statements Hugh- when will it stop? We deserve to be told.

          • Hugh

            I’d link to a research paper showing your replies are fairly uninteresting, but I can’t find one.

          • aracataca

            Stick to the sweeping, puerile and brain dead attacks on EM Hugh- it’s more in keeping with your style.

          • Hugh

            I think my original comment was backed by about as much empirical data as the post to which it referred – more in fact. The only difference I see is that my conclusion based on that data is one you don’t happen to like.

  • charles.ward

    I’d give him an A+ on the fourth P: Posturing.

  • Alex Otley

    Ed seems nice but he’s still an unknown entity. McCluskey is absolutely right – Labour needs policies. Give people a reason to vote Labour and you’ll get more people joining too.

  • markfergusonuk

    Is that an offer?

  • Matthew Blott

    Mark Ferguson’s loyalty is admirable but I fear it clouds his judgement. Given the ineptitude of this government and the complete failure of its economic strategy to award Miliband a B grade seems incredibly generous. The excuses for lacklustre polling being blamed on Labour’s poor starting position is wearing a little thin. This may have been the natural order of things in the past (although I’m not sure that’s really true) but these are not ordinary times. I’ve just finished reading Thomas Frank’s Pity The Billionaire and he provides a devastating critique of Obama’s timid bi-partisan (I hate that word) response to the Great Recession – contrasted with FDR’s action during the Depression. Great leaders seize the moment, hit the ground running and shape public opinion rather than follow it. I never thought Miliband was an FDR but he has shown flashes of boldness (compared with his brother) but it just seems to fizzle out.

  • Daniel Speight

    The gurus, spads and bag carriers will triangulate Labour until it’s unrecognizable if they can. They are doing a good job of this these last couple of months and Miliband has gone along with them.

  • Monkey_Bach

    Ed Miliband is turning out to be exceptionally poor presentationally as a front man. He is a nice enough guy but a remarkably poor debater and orator considering he has done nothing other than politics for most of his adult life. However, there is still a possibility that he may be a very good ideas man and that Labour may, eventually, bounce back into office with a manifesto full of enlightened and workable ideas.


    (I’m not holding my breath though because Miliband actually wrote the last Labour manifesto himself, which was full of vague and some exceptionally bad ideas that would make David Freud himself blush, e.g., stripping young single mothers of benefits unless they agreed to live sequestered lives with their offspring in special centres, called Foyers, reserved to accommodate groups of such people probably miles away from their former homes, friends, families, and support groups.)


  • Featured Is the Labour Party campaigning hard enough for the European elections?

    Is the Labour Party campaigning hard enough for the European elections?

    In a week that supposedly signalled an end of the Cost of Living Crisis as wages begin to rise faster than inflation, Ed Miliband and Ed Balls will feel vindicated to learn that as far as LabourList readers are concerned, at least, it’s not over yet. An overwhelming 94% of those who responded to our survey this week believe the Cost of Living Crisis continues. That will certainly give new strategist David Axelrod something to work with, if activists are convinced […]

    Read more →
  • News Anyone for an Easter (Cl)Egg?

    Anyone for an Easter (Cl)Egg?

    The Mirror today have a story about a Labour attack on Nick Clegg – a chocolate “Easter Clegg”. It’s ‘completely hollow, melts under pressure and leaves bad taste in mouth”. The box also contains a “free mug”. Here’s a photo: Seemingly the Easter Clegg is “100% Authentically Conservative” and should be stored in David Cameron’s pocket. Meanwhile, both The Sun and The Telegraph claim this morning that Miliband would be happy to appoint Nick Clegg as Deputy PM in the event […]

    Read more →
  • News Ed Miliband’s Easter Message

    Ed Miliband’s Easter Message

    Here’s Ed Miliband’s Easter Message – touching on his recent trip to the Holy Land, and the work Christians do in their communities across Britain: “As Christians across Great Britain and the rest of the world gather to celebrate the most important event in the Christian faith, I would like to wish you all a happy Easter. “It was a privilege for me to visit the Holy Land in the lead up to Easter this year. I will be thinking […]

    Read more →
  • Comment UKIP’s attitude to accountability should worry us all

    UKIP’s attitude to accountability should worry us all

    UKIP’s reaction to the allegations over the use of the party’s EU funding has been telling. It tells us that they are not yet ready to take the step up from a being an assortment of oddballs and cranks to a serious political party. After The Times ran their front page on Tuesday, UKIP’s immediate reaction was to denounce the paper as a mouthpiece for the establishment, rather than bother to refute what they felt was incorrect about the article. […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured In praise of Simon Danczuk

    In praise of Simon Danczuk

    Simon Danczuk has led the front pages this week with his explosive account of how an MP could hide a lifetime of abusing children. The Westminster reaction to his Cyril Smith allegations? Embarrassed coughs. Good on Simon for having the courage to speak his mind. Since his 2010 election, itself a feat of endurance, he’s demonstrated a forensic mind and a canny eye for a story. He represents a diminishing Westminster breed, a ‘character’ who speaks with an authentic voice […]

    Read more →