Learning from Lancashire

6th May, 2012 2:07 pm

The national significance of local election results is usually viewed through the lens of how well Labour did in the South. This is, of course, absolutely right if the exam question is ‘Can Labour win an overall majority?’ But if the question changes to ‘Can Cameron win an overall majority?’ or ‘Can Labour become the largest party in a hung Parliament?’, then the focus should rapidly switch back to the North West and Lancashire in particular. So too if the question is ‘How can the Labour party best prepare for 2015?’, a theme covered in Karin Christiansen’s excellent blog on Friday.

At the 2010 election, Labour lost South Ribble, Rossendale and Darwen, Morecambe and Lunesdale and Pendle plus the new seats of Lancaster and Fleetwood and Blackpool North and Cleveleys to the Tories and Burnley to the Lib Dems. To win a working majority (of say 20), Cameron will need to keep all these gains and win some others. Blackpool South and Chorley are both seats that the Tories held from 1979 to 1997 while Hyndburn was the Tories until 1992.

The story this week in Lancashire is one of success for Labour and despair for the Tories. Of the 133 contests that took place, primarily in East Lancashire, Labour gained in 40 of which 24 came directly from the Tories. The party gained power in its key targets of Burnley, Rossendale and Chorley. Only Pendle stemmed the red tide and remains in no overall control.

There are clear lessons here for the rest of the country. Not least because many of the seats that have been gained do not live up to the terraced, red-brick mill housing of Lowry legend but are instead in leafy suburban areas where families live in detached houses with a conservatory and two cars in the drive. These voters are just as aspirational as those in the south (and at the moment, just as squeezed) but because a proper organisation is in place, they are far more likely to meet a Labour activist than in some other parts of the country. Three bits of advice stand out from my time helping out over the last week.

1.     Be professional

Since the mid-1980s in Blackburn with Darwen, Sundays during April have been a sacred time for Labour activists to get together and update each other on contact rates in each ward. CLP Secretary, Phil Riley, explains that these are, “collective meetings open to all to get a collective sense of what’s going on”. Although it was tough going initially, the meetings have now developed into a proper confessional (“like AA meetings”) where someone from each ward turns up to report on their progress and keep tabs on others. The aspiration, achieved in nearly every ward, is to knock on every door and deliver three leaflets during an election.

The simple things are also done effectively with campaign sessions starting promptly, enough time spared in getting nominations papers filed to allow time for any problems to be resolved, and proper use of data to ensure that resources are targeted where they are needed. The result has been astounding with seven gains from seven targets delivered in 2012.

2.     Nominate tireless candidates

In Darwen, Labour won back the town council and took their three target wards. Councillor and local organiser, David Smith, explains that the key is good, local candidates who lead their campaigns from the front. “I always say to people that the candidates need to meet and talk to people and get to know them,” he says, “And they’ve got to get back to people who raise concerns on the doorstep”.

The strategy has been working elsewhere. In Hyndburn, a husband and wife team, Gareth and Kerry Molineux are now both councillors in the semi-suburban ward of Overton. In 2008, Tory Peter Clarke held a majority of 201 but last year, Gareth Molineux won the seat with a majority of 248. His wife, Kerry who is also the CLP Secretary, beat Clarke this year with an expanded majority of 481. Between them and their activist base, the Molineuxs had a 60% contact rate in the ward and, using good quality ‘get out the vote’ cards, reminded their electorate in the days before the poll exactly where to find their polling station and that losing their polling card didn’t stop them from voting. Local MP, Graham Jones, attributes this tactic, which has been used since 2008, to a modest increase in turnout.

3.       Compete everywhere

Howard Dean’s 50-state strategy was a major factor behind Barack Obama’s landslide in 2008. Dean didn’t think that the Democrats could win everywhere but by competing in even the safest Republican strongholds, he made sure his opponents had to put resources where they didn’t want to. Along the way, Obama picked up states like New Carolina and Indiana which Democrats weren’t expecting to win.

Something similar has been happening in East Lancashire. In 2008, Phil Riley stood as a paper candidate in the rock solid Tory ward of Roe Lee and lost by 1134-434. After an off year, he stood again in 2010 but didn’t do much more than in 2008. To his surprise he came within 400 votes on the back of the higher general election turnout. Last year he competed again but this time, with a small group of canvassers, knocked on every door. He won narrowly by 983-917. This year, former teacher, Sylvia Liddle, stood for Labour and on the back of another concerted round of canvassing and Cllr Riley’s success in delivering a new local bus route, she won by 200.

The local party has started the same cycle again this year in Fernhurst where the Tories had a majority of 725 in 2008. With former Usdaw regional organiser, Don McKinlay, as the candidate they reduced the majority to 280 on a 13% swing. The Tories were clearly stunned at the count and poured over the figures. Next time, they may be licking their wounds. All this shows that the old myth that canvassing and leafleting in areas with big houses just provokes the Tories into voting is just that, a myth.


None of these principles are rocket science. Indeed, good practice like this was performed in the pockets where Labour resisted the Tory tide in 2010 and again where the party did well in 2011 and, again, this year. With the media predominantly right-leaning, Labour can only be guaranteed to win the air war if the Tories are on their knees (as in 1997). But these examples show how Labour can decisively win the ground war. There are three years until the next general election so, in most places, two more elections with which to train activists, select great candidates, and develop a strategy which targets scarce resources where they are most needed. If East Lancashire is anything to go by, Labour is on course to beat the Tories.

Will Straw is a Labour activist and writes in a personal capacity

Value our free and unique service?

LabourList has more readers than ever before - but we need your support. Our dedicated coverage of Labour's policies and personalities, internal debates, selections and elections relies on donations from our readers.

If you can support LabourList’s unique and free service then please click here.

To report anything from the comment section, please e-mail [email protected]
  • Amber Star

    Professional, tireless & including every area, that’s how Labour stemmed the rising SNP tide in Scotland too. The teams on the ground did a fantastic job. Labour held our majority in Glasgow, despite the SNP making it a specific target.

  • Sir Bill Taylor

    Blackburn with Darwen also has a track record of engaging & delivering on improved public services in proper partnerships with key stakeholders…

  • All very true and relevant, particular for seats in the south where we lost in 2010 but back on the up now, like mine (Stroud CLP). In Stroud, two years ago we lost our MP (David Drew) and went down to six councillors. For two years running we made five gains on the council, and after last Thursday we’re up to 16, taking the council into NOC. 2011 were standard Lab gains in Lab areas, nothing out of the ordinary. This year however, we expanded into areas that in some cases haven’t been Labour for decades. Employing the tactics above (local candidates, excellent campaing literature, being professional) meant that we won five/six targets, losing the sixth by only 30 votes. We experienced swings of up to 30% to us, and wiped out the Tories in two wards. In the ward of Rodborough, we have won three consecutive elections (county byelection, district 2011, district 2012) where before the general we were consistently fourth, even behind the greens. 

    With sense of direction provided by having a parliamentary candidate, we hope to continue our success and take control of the council as well as return an MP in 2015. The biggest problem is activist base, which is essentially non-existent beyond the bare bones of  what is required. Though the above article talks about the north, what it sets out is desperately needed in the south, and in particular the SW, where we need to do more to return a Lab govt in 2015.

  • The Scottish picture is more complicated than that  Although the nats have been in government for 5 years they still improved their position and still have a lead in the popular vote.  STV has led to the unionist vote  rallying around Labour as many  lib-dem and tory voters gave their second/third vote to Labour while greens and socialist party voters tended to give theirs to the SNP.  If there were a Westminster elsction (FPTP) next week the SNP would probably wipe out the lib-dems and take at least a dozen – maybe even 20 – seats from Labour. If the lib-dems in England Wales did as badly as last thursday they would be reduced to perhaps 20 MPs in total so the nats might end up as the 3rd party at Westminster.
    Of course there won’t be a GE anytime soon; the tories don’t want one, labour has no money and the lib-dems are – naturally enough – concerned that they will be destroyed. If there is no GE  it is quite possible that the nats will win the referendum in 2014.  Not all SNP voters will vote for independence, they but equally there are lots of labour/lib-dem/green/socialist party voters (and even a few tories) who would never vote SNP but will vote Yes in the referendum so it’s pretty hard to predict.

  • The Labour message is clear and very persuasive in the poor old North of this once great nation.

    “Vote for us because we will invest in your future by providing jobs, work and services which will be world class. To pay for this we will soak the rich who mainly live in the South and who are bankers, foreigners and other totally untrustworthy folk who deserve a very good kicking. Meanwhile, we will stand by the vulnerable and the poor by increasing the pay of the hard pressed teachers, nurses, firefighters and their Unions.”

    The Conservatives have absolutely no reply to this which is why the Labour party is going to win the next election hands down.

    (PS But who is going to pay for it all really? Bankers etc love money and they have excellent accountants and can afford excellent computers and first class travel to the place of their dreams. And then there is the unmentionable debt which will not be sneered away.)

  • Pingback: Joking Obama, Lenin’s Demise And Elections. « Soupy One()

  • Pingback: Does David Cameron understand how much he needs the north? | Old News()

  • Pingback: Does David Cameron understand how much he needs the north? | Dani News()

  • Pingback: Will Straw Running For Lancashire Labour Candidacy - Guy Fawkes' blog()


LabourList Daily Email

Everything Labour. Every weekday morning

Share with your friends