There’s been plenty of debate this morning on whether or not the agreed Royal Charter on the Leveson Report will be “underpinned by statute” or not. Labour say it will be, but Cameron says the opposite – and so does Culture Secretary Maria Miller, who said today that “This is not statutory underpinning”.
So let’s clear this up – here’s the amendment that Wilf Stevenson will be proposing in the Lords this afternoon. Assuming this passes, then there will be a statute in place with regard to the Royal Charter. A Labour source told us this morning that:
“This is not a little bit of statute, this is not a dab of statute, this is statute pure and simple.”
—-
84KA*
Insert the following new Clause—
“Royal Charters
Royal Charters: requirements for Parliamentary approval
Where a body is established by Royal Charter after 1 March 2013 with functions relating to the carrying on of an industry, no recommendation may be made to Her Majesty in Council to amend the body’s Charter or dissolve the body unless any requirements included in the Charter on the date it is granted for Parliament to approve the amendment or dissolution have been met.”
More from LabourList
Labour ‘holding up strong’ with support for Budget among voters, claim MPs after national campaign weekend
‘This US election matters more than any in 80 years – the stakes could not be higher’
‘Labour has shown commitment to reach net zero, but must increase ambition’