WATCH: Starmer describes ten-year jail term for travel lies as “empty threat”

Keir Starmer has described the possible ten-year jail term for someone lying about their recent travel history to get around UK coronavirus border restrictions as “an empty threat”, after it was defended by ministers.

The government announced this week that those who lie about travelling to ‘red list’ countries would face a £10,000 fine or prosecution and up to ten years in prison – longer than the maximum sentence for some sex offences.

The move was disapproved of by lawyers, such as lockdown-sceptic Jonathan Sumption and ex-attorney general Dominic Grieve who said the penalty was “entirely disproportionate”. Starmer has now joined the criticisms.

Commenting on the maximum jail term today, Starmer – a former director of public prosecutions – said: “I have prosecuted many cases that have ended in a ten-year sentence, and I know an empty threat when I see it.

“The effectiveness of what happens at the border is to do with testing and quarantining. But pretending there’s going to be a ten-year sentence, when in reality I don’t think there is, I don’t think is really helping anyone.”

More from LabourList

DONATE HERE

Do you value LabourList’s coverage? We need your support.

Our independent journalists have been on the ground during this local and by-election campaign, which marks the first key electoral test of Keir Starmer’s government. 

We’ve been out and about with Labour activists and candidates across the country from Bristol to Hull, and will soon be heading to Cambridgeshire and Lancashire – as well as Runcorn and Helsby. We’ve also polled readers for their views on the campaign.

LabourList relies on donations from readers like you to continue its fair, fast, reliable and well-informed news and analysis. We don’t have party funding or billionaire owners. 

If you value what we do, set up a regular donation today.

DONATE HERE