‘It’s time for Labour to prioritise cancer again’

Credit: Baby-Spider/Shutterstock.com

In 2000, Labour introduced the UK’s first dedicated cancer strategy, marking a pivotal milestone in the fight against cancer. Five years later, their progress report highlighted cancer services as “a major priority for the NHS” and the results were evident. Waiting times fell substantially and cancer survival increased rapidly.

Since then, there have been three more cancer strategies in 2007, 2011, and 2015. The most recent strategy, under the Conservatives, ended in 2020. Four years on, cancer wait times are unacceptably long and today, cancer survival in England generally lags behind comparable countries around the world.

The Darzi Review brought into harsh focus the strain the NHS is under. So, the development of a 10-year health plan for England by the Labour Government is good news.

But it was reports that Health and Social Care Secretary Wes Streeting is considering a new dedicated cancer strategy that really got me listening. His strong leadership could help improve cancer survival and save lives. As a cancer survivor himself, this achievement would be even more profound.

READ MORE:  Employment rights bill: What Labour New Deal policies will become law?

A 10-year NHS plan for England will aim to improve the health outcomes for all, an objective with widespread and popular support.

But I fear this approach will lack the focus and detail that is required to improve the rate of cancer survival quickly enough. It would be like trying to use a world map to navigate the streets of London – it’s not detailed enough to take you where you need to go.  Cancer patients and their loved ones deserve better.

Straight off the mark, Wes Streeting’s approach to prevention was promising. Legislation to increase the age of sale of tobacco products was announced in the King’s Speech just days after Labour won the election. This is a huge opportunity to tackle the biggest cause of cancer in the UK, ease pressures on the NHS and boost the economy. There can be no further delays to getting this vital Bill passed in Parliament.

But Wes Streeting must go further.

Comparing other countries

Countries with dedicated cancer strategies often see better survival rates as evidenced by the International Cancer Benchmarking Partnership (ICBP).  They join up the dots between research, innovation, the NHS and public health.  Expert input, patient involvement, consistent political backing, accountability for delivering on big changes and the funding to make it happen are all essential ingredients of success.

Take Denmark, a country which had similar cancer survival to England 20 years ago. Over the past two decades, Denmark has surged ahead, leaving England in its rear-view mirror.

For example, in the 90s, England and Demark both had among the worst survival rates for rectal cancer compared to similar countries. Denmark has since improved the 5-year net-survival rate for rectal cancer by over 20%, making it one of the best performing countries for this cancer type, whilst England continues to trail. This failure to match progress in other countries comes at a devastating cost to patients and their loved ones.

READ MORE: Government set to name and shame employers more regularly for failures to pay

Developing a long-term cancer strategy is no mean feat. Last year, we published Longer, Better Lives – our manifesto and programme for government. This defines the key steps the UK Government must take to back groundbreaking research, drive earlier diagnosis, and prevent thousands more cancers. If adopted, this manifesto would help avoid 20,000 cancer deaths a year by 2040.

The Labour government has labelled the 2010s a “lost decade for our NHS”. Getting it right for cancer patients will be a significant step towards fixing the NHS in England as a whole.

If they want the 2020s to be any different, they must deliver on cancer and a dedicated cancer plan is the way to do that.


SHARE: If you have anything to share that we should be looking into or publishing about this story – or any other topic involving Labour– contact us (strictly anonymously if you wish) at [email protected]

SUBSCRIBE: Sign up to LabourList’s morning email here for the best briefing on everything Labour, every weekday morning. 

DONATE: If you value our work, please donate to become one of our supporters here and help sustain and expand our coverage.

PARTNER: If you or your organisation might be interested in partnering with us on sponsored events or content, email [email protected].

More from LabourList

DONATE HERE

We provide our content free, but providing daily Labour news, comment and analysis costs money. Small monthly donations from readers like you keep us going. To those already donating: thank you.

If you can afford it, can you join our supporters giving £10 a month?

And if you’re not already reading the best daily round-up of Labour news, analysis and comment…

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR DAILY EMAIL