In exactly two week, Rachel Reeves will deliver her second Budget. The Chancellor has said she will “deal with the world as I find it, not the world as I might wish it to be.”
This is an attempt to set the tone for the upcoming Budget. Whether it is one that will go down well with Labour folks or not remains to be seen.
But speculation remains rife as to what exact measures she will announce at the dispatch box on November 26.
Here are some policies she might announce based on ongoing news reports.
‘Read my lips’
If there’s one lingering question over the upcoming Budget, it’s not whether HMT will raise taxes, it’s how.
Think tank after think tank has projected inevitable tax rises if Rachel Reeves wants to keep to her vaunted fiscal rules.
But it would mean breaking a crucial election pledge if Labour were to increase income tax, national insurance or VAT.
If this happens, the Chancellor will need to have a good answer as to why that promise was broken.
What’s happening with ISAs?
This one has seen a bit of to-ing and thro-ing.
ISAs have long been a popular option for savers, but the Chancellor has floated the prospect of lowering the tax-free allowance on Cash ISAs to encourage more people to invest in stocks and shares.
Whether this will happen has long been a matter of debate – although more recent noises have suggested something to this end.
Gambling tax
This has been one of the most popular potential measures floated.
A tax on gambling companies has long been called for by campaign groups, and the upcoming Budget is likely to see such policies floated.
But don’t expect it to come without backlash. Nigel Farage has put his name to a Sun campaign opposing the measure.
Something more positive?
Could we finally see the two-child benefit cap eased? That’s been one of the main focal points in progressive circles.
Certainly, lifting the cap has been projected to lift child poverty by measurable sums, including by the Resolution Foundation – considered to be close to the Treasury and previously run by Pensions Minister Torsten Bell.
Labour members want to see it junked, but opinion polling stands against it, with surveys showing the public support the cap as it is.
Perhaps this is where there is scope for Labour to make the case for scrapping it.
Subscribe here to our daily newsletter roundup of Labour news, analysis and comment– and follow us on Bluesky, WhatsApp, X and Facebook.
Share your thoughts. Contribute on this story or tell your own by writing to our Editor. The best letters every week will be published on the site. Find out how to get your letter published.
-
- SHARE: If you have anything to share that we should be looking into or publishing about this story – or any other topic involving Labour– contact us (strictly anonymously if you wish) at [email protected].
- SUBSCRIBE: Sign up to LabourList’s morning email here for the best briefing on everything Labour, every weekday morning.
- DONATE: If you value our work, please chip in a few pounds a week and become one of our supporters, helping sustain and expand our coverage.
- PARTNER: If you or your organisation might be interested in partnering with us on sponsored events or projects, email [email protected].
- ADVERTISE: If your organisation would like to advertise or run sponsored pieces on LabourList‘s daily newsletter or website, contact our exclusive ad partners Total Politics at [email protected].


More from LabourList
‘The Mayfield Review could lead to a healthier, happier workforce and lower welfare costs’
‘Scrapping Ebacc is a bold leap forward in ensuring arts education for all’
‘An opportunity to accelerate humane science’