Letters to the Editor – week ending 8th February 2026

Read what people have been writing to our editor about this week. Find out how to share your own views here.

Mandelson Mayhem

Dear Editor,

Alongside the horror and seriousness of what continues to emerge in relation to the Epstein case, there is a wider political dynamic that merits careful attention within Labour and across democratic politics more broadly.

In periods marked by rising populism and declining institutional trust, the political impact of scandal is shaped not only by the substance of revelations but by the informational and emotional environments into which they are released. In highly mediated political cultures, such moments can intensify what is increasingly understood as affective polarisation: the deepening of emotional distrust and hostility between political camps. When this occurs, responses to events are filtered less through procedural evaluation and more through identity, loyalty and factional alignment.

This dynamic is amplified by contemporary information ecosystems characterised by echo chambers and fragmented media publics. Political actors and communities now encounter and interpret events within bounded informational spaces that reinforce prior beliefs and heighten suspicion of institutions and perceived opponents. In such contexts, scandal narratives can rapidly become vehicles for broader institutional delegitimation, regardless of the pursuit of justice or accountability. None of this diminishes the seriousness of the crimes involved or the need for due process; rather, it situates these processes within a volatile communicative landscape.

Mainstream democratic parties are particularly vulnerable in such environments. When internal disagreements become publicly performative within already polarised media spaces, they risk reinforcing the very narratives of institutional dysfunction and instability that populist movements seek to advance. Across multiple democracies, moments of crisis have been used, sometimes deliberately, sometimes inadvertently  to deepen intra-party fragmentation and weaken public confidence in democratic institutions simultaneously.

For Labour, the challenge is therefore twofold: to uphold rigorous standards of accountability and ethical governance, while also maintaining institutional coherence and public trust in democratic processes. Actions that appear principled in isolation can carry wider systemic consequences if they inadvertently intensify factional conflict or erode confidence in the rule of law. This is not an argument for avoiding scrutiny, but for engaging with it in a way that recognises the broader political ecology in which it unfolds.

Political debate in the UK is increasingly shaped by the same polarisation dynamics evident across other established democracies. Responding effectively requires not only integrity but strategic awareness of how scandal, media ecosystems and populist incentives interact. Without that awareness, even well-intentioned responses risk becoming entangled in cycles that deepen division and weaken the democratic institutions they seek to uphold.

Yours sincerely,

Caroline Walsh

*****

Dear Team

I get enough Starmer bashing from mainstream media. His errors of judgment are clear but why can you not balance this narrative with what has been achieved? 

Nationalisation of 11 rail networks, trade deals the tories couldn’t get for years after Brexit.

Last thing we need is a leadership battle which ravaged and distracted Tories for years.

Encourage leadership to listen more, u-turn less, lead from values and economic responsibility.

Yours sincerely

Shanthi Flynn

*****

Securing the narrative

Dear Editor, 

While Labour does make many attempts to communicate its achievements few of these indicate a clear overall purpose of the Labour government that joins all these achievements together. What is missing is a good narrative.

As a narrative ‘Security for Britain’ would make Labour sound solidly patriotic without sounding ridiculously nationalistic. It is also easy to remember which is crucial when trying to make an impact on voters. Alongside a cost of living crisis we are in an era where there seem to be many troubling developments that are global in nature, so security is something so many voters are looking for more than ever. If Labour doesn’t sound interested in providing security, voters will turn to populist alternatives.

If we fail to have a strong narrative, the consequences could be a painful defeat at the next election to an alarming alternative.

Alistair Philpot
Policy Officer for South West Devon CLP

Share your thoughts by writing to our Editor. The best letters every week will be published on the site. Find out how to get your letter published.