Why the social care green paper matters

July 18, 2009 9:24 am

Author:

Share this Article

Joined handsBy Sue Regan

The state of social care affects us all – whether because we need care ourselves, provide care to others or help fund care through taxes and with society getting older and those people most likely to vote it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to work out that all the main parties need to take this seriously.

Since 2007, there have been more people over retirement age than children, and medical advances mean that disabled people are living longer. All to be celebrated, but it means increasing pressures on an already creaking care system.

How well we provide care and support to people who need it, because of old age or disability, is surely a key test of a good society. For too long, poor care services and lack of funding have failed many of our most vulnerable people.

This week’s social care Green Paper is an opportunity to address this. It proposes a National Care Service which aims to combine national entitlements with local service delivery, and suggests a number of options for reforming funding. The Government’s vision is to create a care system that is fair, simple and affordable. The reforms seek to end the post code lottery of care, resulting from wide variations in standards and quantity of care offered across the country.

Currently, low earners on below average incomes are particularly badly affected – often excluded from any help because of modest assets, yet unable to afford care costs.

Low earners are an electoral force not to be dismissed. In 1997, low earners made up the core of the Labour vote. In 2009, low earners overall now say they are more likely to vote Conservative. The Government’s proposals, by providing a universal minimum entitlement and access to support and advice, would benefit all low earners. This message needs to get across loud and clear.

Alongside the Green Paper, the Government launched a Big Care Debate. This issue is too important to discuss behind closed doors and everyone should be encouraged to have their say. The ageing voting profile makes this a key election issue. The scale of the challenge, and how each party responds, could also make it a key political dividing line.

The Green Paper is only one further step on a long journey. Public and political debate is needed to build momentum and to prevent social care reform becoming a victim of the economic crisis, as attention turns elsewhere. The Government’s vision will remain only that unless further progress is made. An early White Paper and a clear, high-profile manifesto commitment are both critical.

Creating a National Care Service fit for all – surely even in an era of difficult choices, this is an ambition we can and must all share.

Sue Regan is Chief Executive of the Resolution Foundation which works to improve outcomes for low earners.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • News Labour Equal marriage amendment gets Tory backing

    Labour Equal marriage amendment gets Tory backing

    From: HERBERT, Nick Sent: 20 May 2013 16:29 To: HERBERT, Nick Subject: Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill – voting today   Dear Colleague Thank you for your support for the Marriage (Same Sex Couples) Bill at Second Reading. You will be aware of the amendments tabled by Tim Loughton and others (new Clauses 10 & 11) to extend civil partnerships to heterosexual couples I have no issue with the principle of this proposal, but I am very worried that adding this measure to the [...]

    Read more →
  • News Whitewash report claims that there’s no such thing as DWP “league tables” for sanctions

    Whitewash report claims that there’s no such thing as DWP “league tables” for sanctions

    Whilst the Westminster village has been working itself up into a lather over the rise of UKIP and when/if there should be an EU referendum, the DWP snuck out a report on the evidence of DWP league tables that we brought you recently. It’s a total whitewash. The report – which you can read here – argues that claims of a league table are entirely down to individual managers at a number of job centres. You could call it the [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured Equal Marriage is the most important thing – but Labour can’t let Equal Civil Partnerships get the “long grass” treatment

    Equal Marriage is the most important thing – but Labour can’t let Equal Civil Partnerships get the “long grass” treatment

    So after toying with support for the Tim Loughton amendment over the weekend, Labour has decided to abstain on that particular amendment, and propose their own. Let’s be clear – the most important news today is that Equal Marriage will pass through the commons, and that’s a cause for huge celebration for all but an isolated minority in the Labour Party. I made clear this morning that I didn’t buy the argument that supporting the Loughton amendment would stop or [...]

    Read more →
  • News Labour’s Equal marriage Bill amendment on Civil Partnerships

    Labour’s Equal marriage Bill amendment on Civil Partnerships

    Labour MPs will be encouraged to back this amendment – rather than that of Tory backbencher Tim Loughton – today: House of Commons Monday 20 May 2013 CONSIDERATION OF BILL New Amendments handed in are marked thus * MARRIAGE (SAME SEX COUPLES) BILL MANUSCRIPT AMENDMENT (a) As an Amendment to Secretary Maria Miller’s proposed New Clause (Review of civil partnership) (NC16):- Kate Green (a)(a * Line 8, leave out from ‘practicable’ to end of Clause, and insert ‘and include a [...]

    Read more →
  • News Is Ed Miliband picking a fight with Google?

    Is Ed Miliband picking a fight with Google?

    In his interview with the Observer yesterday, Ed Miliband singled out Google as a company who aren’t “living up to their responsibilities” on tax, saying: ” I don’t think [Google] are living up to their responsibilities at the moment, and I will be very clear about that on Wednesday. It is part of a culture of irresponsibility. If everyone approaches their tax affairs as some of these companies have approached their tax affairs we wouldn’t have a health service, we wouldn’t [...]

    Read more →