Progressive Tory education policy: subsidise private schools with taxpayers’ money

August 18, 2009 5:19 pm

Private SchoolBy Mike Ion / @MikeIon

Tory controlled Bromley council is considering using taxpayers’ money to subsidise private school pupils whose parents may be struggling to pay the average £12,000 annual fee. Extending support from the taxpayer to all parents who send their children to private schools is obviously part of the new ‘progressive’ Tory agenda.

In fairness it is not unreasonable that any parent should want their child to do as well at school and in life as they have done themselves; often they want them to do better. In a free society if some parents choose to secure advantage and privilege by paying to send their children to elite schools there is little the state can do about it.

Whether the state should financially subsidise some parents to enable them to send their children to such schools is a completely different matter. One must surely question how, in a period of severe economic restraint such a policy could ever be a priority for a Tory council or indeed a future Tory government.

It was Milton Freedman, in his book Capitalism and Freedom, who defended the rights of wealthy people who wanted to put their children into private schooling, to withdraw their contributed taxes or at least the slice of them that fitted the purpose of funding state education, and use it to pay their children’s private school fees. If someone does not want their child to go to their local school and mix with children from the local area, but prefers them to be in company of the better off because it’s their choice (and it is) then shouldn’t it also be at their own expense? Is this unfair?

If parents abandon the state sector and are prepared to pay £12,000 per annum why should he be given any government money at all, whether it is fees subsidies or school subsidies?

It will be interesting to see how the Tory frontbench reacts to this proposal – if Michael Gove has any sense he will distance himself and his party from this silly, ill-conceived nonsense. Labour is likely to go on the attack over this issue – such loopy proposals play into the hands of the ‘many not the few’ headline writers and help to more clearly define Gordon Brown’s famous dividing lines.

Related posts:

  1. Private schools and the pursuit of privilege
  2. Let’s be bold and put forward a positive case for phasing out public schools
  3. Fisking a wilfully ignorant private school parent
  4. How do we open up admissions to faith schools?
  5. Tory PPCs: Compassionate? Progressive? Apparently not

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →