The longer he waits – the more painful

June 22, 2011 12:16 am

Author:

Share this Article

OsborneBy Ed Balls MP

“The weak thing to do is just to keep ploughing on and say ‘I can’t possibly change because I might have a difficult time at a press conference’. The tough, strong thing to do is say ‘yes, we can make these plans better’.”

That’s what David Cameron said yesterday to explain his u-turns on sentencing policy and the NHS. But the Conservative-led government does not yet seem willing to apply this principle to the economy – insisting that any change of course would be disastrous, even when the evidence is growing that their plan isn’t working.

It was announced a year ago today in George Osborne’s first Budget. At its heart was a political choice to tear up our balanced plan to halve the deficit over four years and, instead, decide to cut it further and faster than any other major economy in the world. As George Osborne himself boasted at the time, this would mean an extra £40 billion of spending cuts and tax rises, including a big rise in VAT.

And in an Opposition Day Debate I have called in Parliament today Labour will focus on what’s happened to economic growth, confidence, jobs and living standards in the twelve months since that first Budget.

Rather than sending his Lib Dem deputy to cover for him, as he did last time, I hope the Chancellor will come to the House of Commons today and explain the consequences of his decisions a year ago.

Of course after the global financial crisis – caused by the irresponsible actions of the banks – every major country has a big challenge to get their deficit down. But the debate is about how far and how fast and the short-term impact, whether it works for the long-term and whether it is fair.

First, on the speed and scale of deficit reduction, the Osborne plan has clear goals, but they are driven by a political timetable and a political strategy – to eliminate the structural deficit by 2015-16, get the pain in early in the hope that Labour takes most of the blame with the Lib Dems as human shields taking the rest, and hope the gamble pays off and George Osborne can afford pre-election tax cuts to try and persuade voters the pain was worthwhile.

But, as I said in my speech at the LSE last week, the question is whether it will work. It is too early to make a definitive judgement, but a year on the evidence is not encouraging.

Twelve months on the economic recovery has been choked off with zero growth over the last six months while other countries race ahead, the VAT rise has helped to push up inflation to more than double the government’s target rate, consumer confidence has fallen and manufacturing output and retail sales both fell last month.

There has been a welcome fall in unemployment in the last two months, but the claimant count is rising, vacancies are down, job creation has slowed down in the six months since the spending review, and unemployment is set to be up to 200,000 higher over the coming years than expected just a few months ago.

And by trying to cut the deficit too far and too fast the government now seems to be creating a vicious circle in our economy. The Treasury is now set to borrow £46 billion more than they had planned last autumn because of the slower growth, higher inflation and higher unemployment their policies have delivered. And as new figures showed this week, even though deep cuts and tax rises have now kicked in, the government has borrowed more in the first two months of this year than last year.

Second, on whether it works for the long-term, the test for the economy is not whether we avoid a double-dip recession, or whether unemployment rises or falls in any particular quarter, but how much pain is inflicted along the way in lost growth and lost jobs.

While the American, German and French economies have already recovered to their pre-crisis levels of output, we in Britain are still 4% below that level. And compared to the Office for Budget Responsibility’s forecast before the Budget last June, their latest forecasts imply that by the end of next year we will be £5.6bn worse off as a country.

The cost of that slower growth is equivalent to a loss of income of over £300 for every family. And if UK growth came in 0.5 percentage points below trend in every year of this parliament, our country would be £58bn worse off in 2015 – that’s £3,300 for every family.

And finally, on fairness, George Osborne’s claim that “we are all in this together” is becoming laughable. The banks are getting a tax cut this year while his first Budget’s measures hit women three times harder than men. As for his claims last year that he was delivering a “progressive Budget” and child poverty would not rise, the Institute for Fiscal Studies was clear that the measures were “regressive overall” and that child poverty will rise this year, next year and the year after.

George Osborne brushes all this aside and insists there is no alternative. But as Norman Lamont found with the disastrous ERM policy 20 years ago, it’s easy to get boxed in to a policy that isn’t working. Increasingly tough talk about ‘sticking to the course’ and insisting ‘there is no alternative’ will not change the reality.

I believe it is now time for the Conservative-led government to adopt a more balanced deficit plan which, alongside tough decisions on tax and spending cuts, puts jobs first and will be a better way to get the deficit down over the longer term and avoid long-term damage to the economy.

But even if the government will not change course and agree to halve the deficit over four years, they could take a step in the right direction and do two things to help get the economy moving again and so help the deficit in the long-term.

George Osborne should temporarily cut VAT to 17.5 per cent until the economy returns to strong growth and, instead of giving the banks a tax cut this year, use funds raised from repeating last year’s bank bonus tax to build 25,000 affordable homes and create 100,000 jobs for young people.

Getting the economy moving again and people off the dole and into work is, alongside tough decisions on spending and tax, the best way to get the deficit down over the longer-term and avoid long-term damage to the economy.

It is not too late for George Osborne to change course. On the economy, the tough, cautious and prudent thing is to act before it is too late. But the longer he waits the more painful I fear it will be.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Fairness dictates that we show concern for both sides

    Fairness dictates that we show concern for both sides

    We have all been shocked to see the surge in violence between Israel and Hamas and Islamic Jihad in the Gaza Strip. This conflict is causing enormous hardship on both sides. Particularly distressing is the sight of civilian casualties. The scale of human suffering in the current escalation is immense and every civilian casualty is a tragedy. The people of Gaza have the right to live in peace and freedom, just as Israelis have the right not to fear for […]

    Read more →
  • News Are Osborne’s spinners block journalists from asking questions they don’t like?

    Are Osborne’s spinners block journalists from asking questions they don’t like?

    An intriguing story emerged from a copy of the Express and Star last week, the regional newspaper that covers the West Midlands and Staffordshire. Daniel Wainwright reports that during a recent visit from the Chancellor, a radio journalist said she wanted to ask George Osborne about food banks, and was told that he simply wouldn’t answer it. Here’s the story: “Talking of George Osborne, here’s a little insight into what goes on in the run up to getting an interview. These […]

    Read more →
  • News Alexander intervenes on Gaza escalation that “shames our shared humanity”

    Alexander intervenes on Gaza escalation that “shames our shared humanity”

    Douglas Alexander, Labour Shadow Foreign Secretary, has made another intervention on the Gaza conflict as the crisis in the Middle East continues to escalate. Alexander condemns the attack on a UN school in Gaza, describing the deaths of children there as “[shaming] our shared humanity”. His latest comments seem to be aimed largely at lobbying Israel to stand down the level of the force, and to recognise that as a democracy with “vastly superior technological and military capabilities, comes particular responsibilities”. […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour changes track – and now it can win

    Labour changes track – and now it can win

    Labour has not generated many headlines this week. There haven’t been game-changers. David Cameron wasn’t trounced in Prime Minister’s Questions. The polls haven’t shifted. The meeting with a post-stardust Obama passed by without significant benefit or incident. Yet, this has been Labour’s best week for some considerable time – certainly in this Parliament. Heading into the final furlong of the election race, Labour has three strategic weaknesses: its perceived weaknesses on leadership, an absence of a strong governing story and a […]

    Read more →
  • News This is just one of the reasons why the Tories will never do well in the North East

    This is just one of the reasons why the Tories will never do well in the North East

    David Cameron has been on BBC Radio Tees – that’s the radio station for the Middlesbrough area, and the Tees is the name of the river there. Except this happened (via Buzzfeed): Presenter: “You keep mentioning the River Tyne. That’s not our region prime minister. I’m sorry, we are the River Tees.” Cameron: “I’m sorry, I thought I was doing….” Tyneside is of course around 50 miles North of Middlesbrough – it’s home to Newcastle, and Gateshead, and those of us who are […]

    Read more →