Miliband and Balls unveil alternative Queens’ Speech

30th April, 2012 9:59 am

At a Q&A event this morning at the Coin Street Neighbourhood Centre (the venue Ed Miliband used for his major responsibility speech last year), Miliband and Balls will seek to put further pressure on the government over their mishandling of the economy – attacking “a recession made in Downing Street”.

In addition, they will unveil a set of five priorities for the Queens’ Speech, all based around the idea of “a fair deal”, consolidating several recent policy pledges and effectively producing an “Alternative Queens’ Speech” (as the pressure group Progress have been pushing for in recent weeks). The five proposed bills are:

• A Fair Deal on tax. Alongside implementing Labour’s five point plan for jobs and growth, Labour’s Finance Bill would reverse tax cuts for people earning over £150,000 a year. We would use that money to help pensioners on fixed incomes hit by the “granny tax” and we would restore cuts in tax credits which have hit families.

• A Fair Deal on Energy. Labour’s Energy Bill would break up the dominance of the Big Six power companies and require them by law to offer 4 million elderly people the lowest rate available.

• A Fair Deal on Transport. Labour’s Transport Bill would stop train operators raising fares by more than one per cent above inflation, stop them exploiting commuters with unadvertised rates and give local authorities more control over bus firms.

• A Fair Deal for Consumers. Labour’s Consumer Bill would give new powers to the Financial Conduct Authority and Competition and Markets Authority to stop rip-off surcharges by banks, low-cost airlines and pension firms.

• A Fair Deal on Jobs. Labour’s Jobs Bill would ensure some of the money raised from a tax on bank bonuses is used to provide real jobs, with real wages and responsibilities, to more than 100,000 young people aged 18 – 24.

  • http://twitter.com/_DaveTalbot David Talbot

    A victory for Progress, then, and 5 points well made from Messrs Balls and Miliband.

    • Redshift

      I really don’t think Progress can claim credit for the above. Many of these ideas have been championed by other parts of the party whilst Progress was opposed/uninterested. Glad they are more behind them now, but that isn’t the same as them having a victory…

  • JC

    I’m not convinced. What about: 
    • A Fair Deal on tax. Simplifying the tax system to reduce the possibility of avoidance, unifying income tax and NI, removing people on the minimum wage from income tax and developing a tax system based on maximising revenue, not punishing behavior that is not approved of.• A Fair Deal on Energy. Removing the “Green Taxes” on energy bills. Reduce the VAT on energy, push for better insulated houses and require all new-builds and renovations to at least have high standards of insulation and solar panels.• A Fair Deal on Transport. Look at ways to stop using the poor to subsidise the better off on rail fares and public transport. Possibly use business rates for those areas well served to subsidise these.• A Fair Deal for Consumers. Remove tax from pension fund growth, revitalise town centres by removing parking charges, change the way shop rents are determined.• A Fair Deal on Jobs. Remove employers NI, support the introduction of job contracts and make it easier for small firms to lay off staff.

    • Charlie

      Nothing on housing?

      • JC

        Change the planning laws so house building companies don’t spend more on legal costs than they do on bricks!

  • Colm

    Definitely remove employers NI. Do not understand that tax on jobs. Replace with land tax and energy consumption tax.

  • Pingback: Parliament Since the Budget « Roberta Blackman-Woods MP()

  • Lindaevanspell

    I agree with some of what the Tory rebels say.  And some from Labour, but what Labour says needs clarifying more as it is not that simple about fair deal on tax etc.  I am not going into details and tell you what I think as I do not like anyone take the credit for what I say.  It is all about balancing the economy and giving stability and merging ideas together.

    • Mutafe

       Agreed, we need an economy not based on spending money that we don’t have, or borrowing money that will create no return. We can’t pretend to argue that companies that export and manufacture are equal to borrowing money to spend on diversity projects.

  • Rayallen153

    Housing, the number one cause of poverty in the uk ignored by labour just like it was for 13 years. Shame.

  • Mutafe

    “Reverse tax cuts”? What that you put in place in the dying days of your government just so you could make a stinker when they were brought down? Pathetic Balls, get some real policies.
    Why only for the 4 million elderly? If you’re going to force that (which is fraught with caveats and difficulties) then why not for everyone?
    And Balls, you’ve already pledged to spend the banker’s tax 6 times over what it would raise.
    Grow a pair and maybe you would be worthy of your name.

    • Linda E

      It was Conservatives who gave Tax cuts to anyone earning £150.000 a year not Labour in there so called dying day’s .

  • treborc1

      A Fair Deal on Energy. Labour’s Energy Bill would break up the
    dominance of the Big Six power companies and require them by law to
    offer 4 million elderly people the lowest rate available.

    Why not a fair deal for all.

    Again it’s all sound bites and meaningless, we have heard it all before.

  • denise clendinning

    This is the way forward and progress in the making. and as for some one saying no house building read it again it is in there i have never ever heard anything so ridiculous as putting plastic bags in the queens speech i bet she must have felt embarassed having to read that out. Still a zombie government. Roll on 2015 .

  • Pingback: Ed Miliband’s full response to the Queen’s Speech | kittysjones()

Latest

  • Comment Featured The North punches below its full weight – but Corbyn won’t neglect it

    The North punches below its full weight – but Corbyn won’t neglect it

    A recent report indicated that of the ten poorest regions in the whole of northern Europe, nine are in Britain. In parts of the North the death of traditional industries has been replaced only with a service economy, warehousing and distribution. Often with these sectors has come part time working, false self-employment and temporary working or zero hours contracts. The North deserves better. Yorkshire is bigger in terms of population on its own than Scotland. But our economy is in […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Scotland Labour lost because voters believed it was anti-austerity

    Labour lost because voters believed it was anti-austerity

    Today the Independent Inquiry into why Labour lost announces the first of its findings. We set up the Inquiry because we wanted an objective, empirical analysis of why Labour lost in May. Our aim is to help Labour understand its defeat and so begin to reconnect with the electorate and rebuild its politics. It will require accepting some hard truths. The first hard truth is that the Tories didn’t win despite austerity, they won because of it. Voters did not […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Burnham: I’ll renationalise the railways

    Burnham: I’ll renationalise the railways

    Andy Burnham will this week pledge to renationalise the railways. He will announce the policy on Thursday, as well as support for re-regulation of bus services and support for high speed cross-country east to west rail services. The leadership candidate will attack the Tories for selling off the East Coast mainline, after the state-run service ran a profit and cut train tickets for customers. In a “personal manifesto” launching this week, Burnham will support bringing rail franchises back into government […]

    Read more →
  • News UK tax system is “not fit for purpose”

    UK tax system is “not fit for purpose”

    Research suggests that talking about tax is not as “politically toxic” with voters as it is perceived to be, and Labour urgently needs to consider radical tax reforms, according to a new Fabian Society report. Tax for our Times (which you can read here) sets out how the “UK’s tax system isn’t fit for purpose and specialists across the board agree on the need for reform”. The pamphlet brings together diverse voices from across the Labour Party, including Patrick Diamond, […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Deputy leader CLP nominations and how they compare to 2007

    Deputy leader CLP nominations and how they compare to 2007

    On Friday the deadline for Constituency Labour Parties (CLPs) up and down the country to nominate their chosen candidate in the leadership race closed. Yesterday we published a full table of how CLPs nominated this time round in comparison to 2010. But what about the deputy leadership contest? The CLP results for this year are as follows (we have a full list of how each CLP nominated at the bottom of this page): Ben Bradshaw 20 Stella Creasy 77 Angela […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit