The Omnishambles continues – this time it’s jobs

May 11, 2012 11:14 am

When the Regional Growth Fund was unveiled Nick Clegg claimed that it would create 500,000 new jobs. Yet a scathing report from the National Audit Office says that it will only create 41,000 jobs. As Chuka Umunna said this morning:

“While Nick Clegg said the Fund would lead to half a million jobs, the report forecasts that it will create only up to 41,000 jobs, and many of them would have been created in any event without the RGF.”

Why don’t we look at the difference between those two numbers as a graph:

Under the RGF the cost per job is £33,000 – under Labour’s Future Jobs Fund (described by Cameron as as “expensive”), the cost per job was just £6,500.

  • https://mikestallard.virtualgallery.com/ Mike Stallard

    Regional development is a brainchild of the EU. It is designed to get rid of the nationalities which, they think, cause wars and to replace them with regional government under the EU.
    John Prescott tried to introduce this EU measure in vain in his own area.

    Nick Clegg and his prosperous EU wife are failing in this because we, in UK are not about to undo centuries of hard won unity and to hand our country over to continental government.

    • trotters1957

      Regional development funding has been a feature of all post war governments, and rightly so.

      If we weren’t in the EU we would still need regional funding.

      Attack the EU by all means but at least get your facts straight.

      • treborc1

         Regional development is a brainchild of the EU.

        I thought it started in the 1930 during the great recession down turn and it carried on  after ww2

        • ROB SHEFFIELD

          Regional Development is a brainchild of centrist keynesian economics: and long may it continue.

          • https://mikestallard.virtualgallery.com/ Mike Stallard

            The advantages of Regional Government are that they employ a lot more civil servants and give a lot more employment. They are nearer the grass roots, too, than national government. And they are bigger than the counties which are pretty small really.
            However, with the EU proposals, the County and District Councils would still be in place. So would the four national parliaments. They just add another layer of officials.

            The EU wants them, of course, to stamp out nationalism. By dealing with regions, they can divide big nations up and control each region much more effectively. Divide et impera!

            (PS actually they are the brainchild of Monnet following his socialist star0>

          • treborc1

             Well whom ever started it’s helping us in Wales and if it splits the country, well that’s been happening for years

          • https://mikestallard.virtualgallery.com/ Mike Stallard

            Well, it all depends really on how much you trust the Commissioners of the EU. If they turn sour, then tiny little Wales isn’t going to be much of a shelter compared with the United Kingdom is it? 

          • treborc1

            It’s so tiny you lot could not stay out

          • https://mikestallard.virtualgallery.com/ Mike Stallard

            You lot?
            I assume you are referring to the Anglo Saxon invasion of Brittannia c. 510 a.d.?
            Or maybe the Premiership of Lloyd George? Or the Tudor monarchy?

          • treborc1

             Wellof course the Tudors are welsh so it was an invasion of the English

          • https://mikestallard.virtualgallery.com/ Mike Stallard

            Your picture looks like that of Aneurin Bevan – is this deliberate? He was another Welshman who did very well out of the Union too.

          • treborc1

             I did as well £86,000 compensation for my accident, good old Unions

    • Brumanuensis

      You know what. You’re right. However, I for one welcome our new EU overlords.

  • Quiet_Sceptic

    It looks appalling value and it leaves the tax-payer with little to show for their money.

    At least if you sink £1.4bn into social housing you generate jobs (typically 2 per house?), you help alleviate the national housing shortage and you have £1.4bn of housing assets on the balance sheet to off-set the debt.

    You even have the option at a future date of selling the houses to pay-back the debt incurred in building them. If you don’t throw away tax-payers money on discounts to buy the votes of the current occupiers then over a reasonable period the government would probably make a good return. A form of self-financing fiscal stimulus.

    • Alexwilliamz

      You could also incorporate the requirement to offer a certain proportion/number of apprenticeships as part of the deal. This just seems such a no brainer I can only assume there is vested interests at work, either that or the fear that a mass house building programme will cause a massive drop in house prices??

Latest

  • Featured The Labour Party is a moral crusade or it is nothing – and now’s the time to fight.

    The Labour Party is a moral crusade or it is nothing – and now’s the time to fight.

    Every day matters. Every single day between now and 7th May, thousands and thousands of Labour activists will be out on the doorsteps fighting this general election one street at a time. But through the cold and the rain and the dark nights, this fight isn’t just about the Labour Party, it’s about the millions of people we got into politics to represent. It’s about the people whose doors we knock on – the young woman worried about whether her […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Future Jobs of Britain: Ensuring everyone has a stake

    Future Jobs of Britain: Ensuring everyone has a stake

    We believe a Britain where everyone can do well for themselves and achieve their aspirations – where the next generation does better than the last – is the right vision for Britain.  We can only realise this goal if we build an economy which raises living standards for all working people, not just a few at the top. We certainly haven’t seen this under a Tory led Government, but we are clear that this is the destination of the next […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour announce they’ll break “the stranglehold” big private bus operators have over services

    Labour announce they’ll break “the stranglehold” big private bus operators have over services

    Labour have announced that they would stop five companies from dominating the bus service market, by making it easier for not-for-profit operators to run services. At the moment, Stagecoach, Arriva, Go-Ahead, First Group and National Express control 72% of local bus services. It’s said, Labour are looking at groups such as Hackney Community Transport – a social enterprise that provides transport to London and certain areas of Yorkshire. Founded in 1982, the company has no shareholders and looks to invest […]

    Read more →
  • Comment ‘I would have been angry too’

    ‘I would have been angry too’

    Labour needs to learn to let go, says Jim McMahon in exclusive interview with Liz Kendall and Steve Reed for their new pamphlet with Progress ‘If we had gone into marriage guidance counselling at that point,’ says Jim McMahon of the relationship between Oldham council and its residents two years ago, ‘the counsellor might have said: “Do you know what, it might just be time to part ways”.’ Oldham was not, says the man who has led it since May […]

    Read more →
  • News Majority of LabourList readers agree with statement from left-wing MPs

    Majority of LabourList readers agree with statement from left-wing MPs

    At the start of this week, 15 MPs issued a statement calling for an alternative to Labour’s current deficit reduction plans, a policy that would see the railways returned to public ownership and a more robust collective bargaining powers for workers, including better employment rights in the workplace. These proposals are not Labour policy and it’s unlikely that they will be before the election (or at least the first two won’t make it into the manifesto). But what do LabourList […]

    Read more →