Politics matters – here’s why…

7th November, 2012 7:05 pm

Every political activist has, at some time, asked why they bother. Friends and family often can’t understand it. Often we can’t understand it ourselves. The crisis of politics, which I’ve written about before on these pages, is huge – arguably more serious, and bigger, than the financial crisis. It spans continents and infects the political and social environment of many major democracies. Barack Obama will never have to stand for election again, but in his acceptance speech, he gave a fantastic and concise explanation of why politics matters. This will (probably) be the last mention of Obama on these pages today – but it’s a good onem I promise. Here’s the quote:

‎”I know that political campaigns can sometimes seem small, even silly. And that provides plenty of fodder for the cynics who tell us that politics is nothing more than a contest of egos or the domain of special interests. But if you ever get the chance to talk to folks who turned out at our rallies and crowded along a rope line in a high school gym or – or saw folks working late at a campaign office in some tiny county far away from home, you’ll discover something else.

You’ll hear the determination in the voice of a young field organiser who’s working his way through college and wants to make sure every child has that same opportunity. You’ll hear the pride in the voice of a volunteer who’s going door to door because her brother was finally hired when the local auto plant added another shift.

You’ll hear the deep patriotism in the voice of a military spouse who’s working the phones late at night to make sure that no one who fights for this country ever has to fight for a job or a roof over their head when they come home.

That’s why we do this. That’s what politics can be. That’s why elections matter.”

That should ring true to anyone who has ever worked on the campaign. Or to put it another way:

“Some may belittle politics but we who are engaged in it know that it is where people stand tall. Although I know that it has many harsh contentions, it is still the arena that sets the heart beating a little faster. If it is, on occasions, the place of low skulduggery, it is more often the place for the pursuit of noble causes.”

Politics matters.

  • AlanGiles

    “Some may belittle politics but we who are engaged in it know that it is where people stand tall. Although I know that it has many harsh contentions, it is still the arena that sets the heart beating a little faster. If it is, on occasions, the place of low skulduggery, it is more often the place for the pursuit of noble causes.”Politics matters.”

    Pass the sickbag, Alice!. An attempt to paint Blair as Obama.  How Tony Blair could have even used those words without blushing – after the Iraq war, the cash for peerages debacle, the blind eye turned to expenses frauds, the personal greed and avarice, and so many other things, really shows that he missed his vocation – he should have been on the stage. In what capacity, it is for the individual to decide for themselves.

    What is “noble” about old men buying themselves £8000 TV sets with public money, then blaming the aberration on their “OCD”, or having their moats cleaned, or submitting false invoices for cleaning work never done?

    • Chilbaldi

      As Obama said of Tony Blair: “sizzle and substance”

  • IAS2011

    Politics has to build from a foundation that reflects the Fairness and Justice that reflects a democracy, along with good ethical standards that pursue social mobility improvements amid the harsh reality of social challenges that people face and a policy that ignites Capitalism… but with a Conscience(??).

    In order for politics to be Trusted it needs to preside on a system where MPs have a Legal and/or Statutory Obligation to Represent its constituents. This will be its strength! This will be its bedrock! Then progress can begin, as a direct result of this fundamental Change.Similarly, the Leveson Inquiry has been motivated by politics, aimed at raising the question of whether the News media should have Statutory Regulation. But, how can this momentous moment be victorious without the same question being asked of our political system – MPs –  and how the parliamentary Ombudsman (though further independence will be advised) can play a significant role in measuring the quality of MPs Representation and dealing with complaints from constituents who feel that their MP have failed them. Isn’t this accountability necessary? After all, it is MPs whose role is funded by the Public purse, while the News Media corporations are private companies. Isn’t it clear that the Leveson Inquiry has everything to do with the fixation by the press on celebrities and elites of various kinds? Surely, we all know this has nothing to do with ‘ordinary people’ whose desperate ‘voices’ are begging for attention amid their BIG and powerful stories that never seem of interest or focus by the press. I should know. I’ve tried for years to get a BIG story in the press. Why is it so difficult to achieve? Simply because it’s about ‘who you know’  and ‘who you are.’So, shouldn’t the spotlight now be placed harshly on the wavering foundation of our political system whereby MPs get paid £65,000 pa without having any existing contract to bind a fundamental responsibility with the public… under Democratic ‘terms and conditions? 

    Democratic Progress can only ignite when a fundamental Change strikes it.

Latest

  • Comment The person I want to vote for has a vision of what Labour is working for, not just what we’re working against

    The person I want to vote for has a vision of what Labour is working for, not just what we’re working against

    I want to vote for the person who doesn’t just focus on what we’re working against, but has a compelling vision of what the Labour Party is working for. The person who is willing to talk about how we can inspire happiness, kindness and hope in all too many communities that have been left behind. The person who doesn’t only see that too many people and places got a raw deal in the past, but offers an optimistic vision for […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Unite believes in fighting the battle of ideas

    Unite believes in fighting the battle of ideas

    Richard Angell recalls the moves a couple of years ago to have Progress, the organisation he directs, excluded from the Labour Party.  Ungenerously, he omits to record that Len McCluskey spoke out, on behalf of Unite, against any such proposal.  That is because our union believes in debate and in fighting the battle of ideas, rather than solving differences through bans and anathemas. Clearly, Richard is not overwhelmed by gratitude, since he singles Unite and its General Secretary out for […]

    Read more →
  • News LabourList Podcast – EU referendum and leadership contests

    LabourList Podcast – EU referendum and leadership contests

    This week, the LabourList team discuss the deputy leader and Scottish leadership elections, Labour’s new position on an EU referendum, and the possibility of lowering the voting age.

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured The problem for Labour isn’t toxicity, it’s credibility

    The problem for Labour isn’t toxicity, it’s credibility

    Polly Toynbee writes today that it would be a mistake for the next Labour leader to ditch the party’s most recent policies. In her view, the party lost the election not because of its policies but because of its reputation and leader. If that were the case, the party could win the next election with similar policies – so long as it addressed its other weaknesses. But can you separate the policies from Labour’s weaknesses? That is, did Labour lose because of […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Has the politics of aspiration fallen at the first hurdle?

    Has the politics of aspiration fallen at the first hurdle?

    In the fortnight after May 8 the word aspiration quickly became Labour Party shorthand for tapping into voters personal ambition. As quickly as the idea of aspiration politics took root in Labour policy circles – it has been discredited. Described as the rationale for the party to shift to the right, the vehicle to rebadge tax cuts, support free schools or public sector reform.  A TUC poll found that aspiration as a concept is an irrelevance to voters. But let’s […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit