This isn’t a tale from time of Dickens. This is no Victorian workhouse. This is modern day Britain

November 20, 2012 5:28 pm

Listen to any Tory minister speak about business and worker’s rights, and you know it’ll only be a matter of time before they launch an attack – sometimes coded, sometimes blatant – on worker’s rights. Red tape, they will argue, is making life difficult for businesses. That’s despite Britain having the weakest worker’s rights in Europe.

The Tories would like to see worker’s giving up what few rights they do have in return for shares in the company, but that could be disastrous.

Consider the following example.

Widespread accusations of blacklisting, racial abuse, bullying and extortion, with allegations that workers were required to provide gold in return for extended holidays or overtime.

But this isn’t a tale from time of Dickens. This is no Victorian workhouse. This is modern day Britain.

In recent years, 150 workers, (mainly Asian women of Goan heritage); have alleged that they were subject to racial abuse, bullying, and extortion by staff at Carillion. They are employed as cleaners, catering workers and ancilliary staff at the Great Western Hospital in Swindon. These people are the backbone of the NHS – keeping wards clean and delivering meals to patients.

Yet these same people have claimed that they were subject to numerous attacks on their rights. Low paid workers have signed statements that claim they were asked for up to £1000 by their supervisors – a huge sum at the best of times. Another worker reported being told:

“I am the manager and I can sack you and if you give me gold I will let you keep your job.”

It reads like something from the employment rights dark ages.

And yet, despite Carillion accepting that incidents of gift giving for favours from managers took place, their reaction was to discipline several of the whistle-blowers who came forward to give evidence against supervisors.

Despite the allegations, evidence and investigation findings, nobody has been suspended. Meanwhile, Carillion still has a number of lucrative contracts, pulling in money – directly or indirectly – from the public purse.

No amount of so called “red tape” has so far protected these vulnerable, poorly paid workers from the exploitation, abuse and extortion in the workplace they believe they’ve been subjected to. And all of this has taken place despite the “protection” of our current worker’s rights legislation.

Tonight, workers from Carillion will be in Parliament with the GMB (their union) to call for an end to the treatment that has plagued the staff in Swindon. With the current government in power, it seems unlikely that their voices will be heard.

But next time a member of this government stands up in parliament, or elsewhere, and rages against the red tape and worker’s rights that are holding back British business, remember the Carillion workers. And remember that the same company are still making money from your taxes.

“Blacklisting, racial abuse, bullying, extortion – a modern workplace at Carillion, takes place tonight”, 6pm in the Grand Committee Hall, in Parliament. Speakers include A Carillion Worker, Pragna Petal -Southall Black Sisters, Dave Smith – Blacklisted worker and Frank Doran MP

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_ZPXYLRVP4XOIGGDJWAL6HUO7U4 David

    Mark, I see plenty of claims which, if true, are shocking and appalling. I do not, however, see anything from the links you provide which suggest that the police have investigated and certainly nothing suggesting they have found sufficient evidence to prosecute, as one would expect given the apparent clarity of criminal intent.

    I therefore find myself torn between hoping it is true so that the victims can find justice, and hoping that it is false to spare the blushes of the police.

    In either event it must be made clear that these remain allegations; that no-one (not even a large company) can flout the law; but for balance here we must also be clear that no-one (not even a large company) should be judged without due investigation and trial: the Lord McAlpine saga has clearly brought that point home, and I urge you to temper your editorial line accordingly.

    Whether true or false it is clear that there need to be very serious repercussions to these issues, to match the nature of the allegations.

  • charles.ward

    From the Guardian article:

    “When staff complained of the practice as early as 2007 …”

    Clearly the Tories have been using their time machine to oppress the workers again!

  • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

    I’m currently reading an account of undocumented Chinese immigrants who work in the UK: Chinese Whispers: The True Story Behind Britain’s Hidden Army of Labour, by Hsiao-Hung Pai (2008).

    It is a truly shocking account of the unimaginable exploitation experienced by hundreds of thousands of desperate people working in the UK’s shadow economy – to the benefit of unscrupulous, opportunistic agencies, employers and even, through the agricultural supply chain, high-street supermarkets.

    As can be seen from the publication date – this was happening under a Labour government. Sadly I’m not surprised that the needs of the most cruelly exploited were ignored by Labour politicians when they were in a position to do something about it.

  • jaime taurosangastre candelas

    If this is true, it is an awful abuse, seems to me as a non-legal person to be clearly criminal behaviour, and something there are already laws to use in prosecution.

    But I am slightly disturbed, particularly with the recent news of “mob justice” on Twitter and Lord MacAlpine. Here we have a set of very serious allegations against a company, a “debate” hosted in Parliament itself, the terms of the debate”Blacklisting, racial abuse, bullying, extortion – a modern workplace at Carillion” seem hardly balanced, the speakers’ list as published seems completely lop-sided. You have to wonder if Carillion have been invited to respond, and more widely, if this article is wise for LL to publish.

    If the allegations turn out to be untrue, it will be very expensive indeed for those who publicised them (I do not include LL in that – reporting of a public event is surely OK).

  • Dave Postles
  • Dave Postles
  • Dave Postles
    • jaime taurosangastre candelas

      If you want to make a point, why not wait until there is an article that is even vaguely associated with your point? You relentlessly try to shoe-horn in your points to almost anything that LL publish, relevant or not. You did just that a couple of days ago with some nonsense about your UK Uncut protests about Starbucks in the comments on the very serious topic of mental health.

      No doubt you will decry my “illiberal” viewpoint, and proclaim your rights to say anything you want. But it does look like hijacking to normal people.

    • jaime taurosangastre candelas

      If you want to make a point, why not wait until there is an article that is even vaguely associated with your point? You relentlessly try to shoe-horn in your points to almost anything that LL publish, relevant or not. You did just that a couple of days ago with some nonsense about your UK Uncut protests about Starbucks in the comments on the very serious topic of mental health.

      No doubt you will decry my “illiberal” viewpoint, and proclaim your rights to say anything you want. But it does look like hijacking to normal people.

    • jaime taurosangastre candelas

      If you want to make a point, why not wait until there is an article that is even vaguely associated with your point? You relentlessly try to shoe-horn in your points to almost anything that LL publish, relevant or not. You did just that a couple of days ago with some nonsense about your UK Uncut protests about Starbucks in the comments on the very serious topic of mental health.

      No doubt you will decry my “illiberal” viewpoint, and proclaim your rights to say anything you want. But it does look like hijacking to normal people.

    • jaime taurosangastre candelas

      If you want to make a point, why not wait until there is an article that is even vaguely associated with your point? You relentlessly try to shoe-horn in your points to almost anything that LL publish, relevant or not. You did just that a couple of days ago with some nonsense about your UK Uncut protests about Starbucks in the comments on the very serious topic of mental health.

      No doubt you will decry my “illiberal” viewpoint, and proclaim your rights to say anything you want. But it does look like hijacking to normal people.

    • jaime taurosangastre candelas

      If you want to make a point, why not wait until there is an article that is even vaguely associated with your point? You relentlessly try to shoe-horn in your points to almost anything that LL publish, relevant or not. You did just that a couple of days ago with some nonsense about your UK Uncut protests about Starbucks in the comments on the very serious topic of mental health.

      No doubt you will decry my “illiberal” viewpoint, and proclaim your rights to say anything you want. But it does look like hijacking to normal people.

  • Jeremy_Preece

    This is a tale that I would never had thought could happen in modern Britain. The Conservative Party that I knew of when I was growing up in the 1960’s and 70’s was nowhere near as bad as this – not that I liked them then either.

    The current economic policy seems to me to be an exercise in using the deficit as a cover to strip out rights of working people from working and middle classes in order to make a super-rich group even richer. The whole “cutting red tape” thing is basically saying that in order to compete with third world economies that the Tories want to create a third world economy out of the UK.

    Labour should be screaming about this until everyone has heard about it.
    Not only are these people been ruthlessly ripped off, but this type of operation is destroying proper decent jobs.

    • BillFrancisOConnor

      This is correct. The whole austerity agenda is designed to cheapen labour costs and employment protection across the West so we can at least attempt to compete with China.

  • Pingback: CARILLION GMB MEMBERS AT PACKED HOUSE OF COMMONS MEETING | Socialist Unity

Latest

  • Comment Europe McFadden’s appointment comes at a time of big opportunity for Labour on Europe

    McFadden’s appointment comes at a time of big opportunity for Labour on Europe

    Pat McFadden is taking over the Europe brief just at the time when the issue can work in Labour’s favour. Provided we hold to Ed Miliband’s decision not to cave in to the calls to offer an in-out referendum. Europe is again becoming toxic for the Tories. How Cameron must be looking back wistfully to that time when he told his party to stop banging on about Europe. That’s exactly what it is now doing. And it’s largely his own […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The Next Portillo Moment

    The Next Portillo Moment

    Undoubtedly the highlight of election night ‘97 was seeing Labour record the unlikeliest of victories where I live in Enfield Southgate. We did it through hard work, at the time all three Enfield seats were blue and though the Labour swing meant that Edmonton and Enfield North were going red regardless it took a special campaign lead by an extraordinarily good candidate in Stephen Twigg to record what was an iconic victory in the Party’s history. We held the seat […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The business backlash against Tory EU exit plans 

    The business backlash against Tory EU exit plans 

    It’s not just José Manuel Barroso who has warned David Cameron that his party is taking the wrong approach when it comes to talk of an EU exit. There is a clear sense of concern and anger from the UK and international business community in respect of the Tory plans for an in/out referendum on the UK’s membership of the EU in 2017. This has led to a serious business backlash against the Tories. Standard & Poor’s, the international rating […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Miliband sets out 5 point immigration reform plan (but won’t join “Operation Pander”)

    Miliband sets out 5 point immigration reform plan (but won’t join “Operation Pander”)

    Ed Miliband is in Rochester today, where he’s campaigning for the party’s by-election candidate Naushabah Khan against what he called the “two Tory opponents” of UKIP and the Tories in the Rochester and Strood by-election. But the main purpose of Miliband’s speech was to set out what Labour’s approach to immigration will be – specifically an Immigration Reform Bill in the first Queen’s Speech of the new Parliament. Miliband announced it’d be based around five key principles (most of which […]

    Read more →
  • News Sadiq Khan asks Mansion Tax critics – how would you fund the NHS?

    Sadiq Khan asks Mansion Tax critics – how would you fund the NHS?

    Since Labour conference, the majority of Labour’s potential London mayoral candidates have been critical of the party’s Mansion Tax proposals. However one presumptive candidate has been consistently positive about the plans – Sadiq Khan. That’s understandable and expected, as he’s a Shadow Cabinet member and a Miliband loyalist. But Khan has now launched a public defence of the tax (calling it “absolutely fair”) and a broadside against critics, asking them “why they are opposed to hiring thousands more nurses and doctors […]

    Read more →