If Eric Pickles wants a revolution, we should give him one

20th December, 2012 2:50 pm

When Eric Pickles was in his mid-30s, in 1988, he became leader of Bradford Council. Cllr Pickles’ rise to the civic leadership of one of the great northern cities was not the result of some great electoral surge in favour of Margaret Thatcher’s Conservative Party. At the time, just three years after the miners’ strike, Thatcher was not all that popular in Yorkshire. Pickles became leader after putting a Tory in as Mayor, thus giving the Tories a majority of one. Despite not winning an election outright, the Tories launched a programme of cuts to the council, slashing £50m from the budget and sacking one third of the staff, putting thousands of Bradford citizens on the dole. It was dubbed the ‘Bradford Revolution’.

Now, why did he do it? It was not because of some great financial crisis which required such sado-monetarism. It was because Pickles believes in a small state, lower taxes, and lower public spending. He joined the Conservative Party in 1979, not through family tradition or an idle lack of imagination, but because he was a Thatcherite. There’s nothing ignoble about that. He’s an ideological Tory, a small-state revolutionary in the Thatcher and Reagan mould. He’s read his Trotsky. He understands that revolution should be permanent, and the need for dramatic political acts.

We shouldn’t be too surprised that he’s taken the axe both to his own government department and to local government. He’s doing it because he wants to. The Communities and Local Government (CLG) department has been cut by 44%. The open-plan floors of Eland House are filled with empty desks and vacant chairs. The keyboards lie idle. Whole projects have been scrapped. It’s like the opening scenes of 28 Days Later.

Yesterday, the Pickles revolution spread to the town halls. When Pickles planned the Bradford revolution, he drew up contingency plans for an all-out local government workers’ strike. Then, as now, Pickles is not a politician overly bothered by public opinion. The cuts he announced yesterday will hit the poorest areas hardest, with Labour-run towns and cities in the front line. Liverpool city council is facing a cut of 6.2% in its spending in 2014/15, while Mole Valley in Tory Surrey will get an increase of 0.55% The six places facing the biggest cuts are Barrow, Bolsover, Hastings, Burnley, Hyndburn, and Pendle. The great cities – Liverpool, Manchester, Newcastle, Sheffield, Nottingham, Leeds and Birmingham – will be laying off their workers, closing libraries and squeezing social services. Some will see cuts of nearly 9%.

Pickles’ cuts will kill stone dead any Tory recovery in the north. The front pages of today’s Liverpool Echo, Newcastle Journal and Manchester Evening News are laced with anti-government outrage. There is a real danger that the British cities which enjoyed a renaissance under Labour, will slip back into the urban wastelands of the 1980s, with the unemployed centres, homeless teenagers and soup kitchens. Pickles is rebuilding, brick by brick, the North-South divide.

What should Labour’s response be? In the 1980s, faced with similar cuts, Labour’s response was divided between the revolutionary defeatists, (Liverpool and Lambeth) and the soft-left realists (Sheffield, Manchester, the GLC) who advanced the idea of the ‘dented shield’. This meant that Labour groups implemented cuts, but protected the most vulnerable as far as possible.

This time round, there are few town hall revolutionaries. The Trots are largely absent. Instead, there are sensible Labour councillors working hard to protect their communities. Their first duty is to reduce any waste and inefficiency. Eric Pickles’ department issued Fifty Sensible Savings yesterday. The timing and tone of the document will send blood-pressures soaring in most Labour groups, but it does contain some useful ideas. I’ve always argued that councils’ artworks held in storage could be put to better use. Of course, opportunities to generate extra revenue should be exploited such as coffee shops in libraries. But the amounts are negligible compared to the scale of Pickle’s cuts, and most councils have been doing this stuff for years. Even Starbucks can’t make that much from selling coffee.

The second duty is to turn their town halls into centres of resistance. Part of the Coalition’s political strategy is to force councils to take on the responsibility for cuts, in the hope they will take the blame. It’s no accident the cuts fall hardest in Labour areas, and least in Tory ones. Labour councillors must ensure through argument and campaigning that it is government ministers who get the blame. In Sheffield for example, the primary culprit is not council leader Julie Dore, but local MP Nick Clegg. As in the 1980s, the Tories must be wiped out in the northern cities, and this time they should take their Lib Dem collaborators with them.

The third, and most important duty of Labour councillors is to be radical. They must take Rahm Emanuel’s advice and not let a serious crisis go to waste. The financial crisis can be an opportunity to look again at the function of local government. Aside from the statutory services, councillors should ask what needs to be done by the town hall, and what can be done by co-operatives, community councils, and the third sector? In Lambeth, the ‘co-operative council’ model shows the way for the rest of local government.

This is a million miles from the ‘Big Society’, which as Cameron admitted in PMQs yesterday, is all about charity replacing the welfare state as the safety net for the poorest and vulnerable. Instead, it is about the transfer of assets to community co-ops, a revival in genuine grassroots democracy and workers’ participation, and co-authorship of services. We can re-invent the local state, and build our electoral coalition at the same time.

If Eric Pickles wants a revolution, we should give him one.

  • Andrew

    Please explain why cuts in the public sector must lead to “the urban wastelands of the 1980s, with the unemployed centres, homeless teenagers and soup kitchens”. If there is no private sector generating wealth, then necessarily this will be the result. The public sector has the opposing effect, unless you still seriously believe you can borrow your way to prosperity!!!!!

  • Amber_Star

    Instead, it is about the transfer of assets to community co-ops.

    ———————
    Co-ops are a very desirable alternative to irresponsible or unethical corporations but if the co-ops are groups of private citizens they should not be gifted ownership of public assets. The assets should be leased to the co-ops for a ‘peppercorn’ rent with appropriate conditions attached to the lease.

  • Jeremy_Preece

    While I agree with most of this article I would say that down here in the South of England there are plenty of people suffering and the biggest rise in activity is in the food-banks. As Labour, we really need to get through to the electorate down here in the South as well.

  • Jeremy_Preece

    I didn’t really want to see Scottish independance, but if I lived in Scotland and could see the Tory hatchet swinging at my public sector in a land where few vote for the Conservatives then I would want to be independant.
    The Tories are all about divide and rule, and they are really keen to destroy bodies such as local councils and trade unions who offer the ability for people to come together to oppose them.

  • Dave Postles

    Yes.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    Some of the proposals are plain daft. Coffee shops in libraries not only make a loss, but also take trade from the High street, which is in opposition to other aspects of government policy

Latest

  • News Health service workers trust Labour the most on the NHS, poll finds

    Health service workers trust Labour the most on the NHS, poll finds

    People who work in the health service say Labour are the party they trust most with the NHS, a poll has found. Dods Research asked 2,000 health workers which parties’ policies they thought would most benefit their work. 29% said Labour, the Conservatives came in 11 points behind on 18%, while the Lib Dems  got 6%, the Greens 5% and UKIP received the least amount of votes with 3%. Meanwhile 33% said they didn’t know or would prefer not to […]

    Read more →
  • News Scotland Herald publishes letter from 100 ‘Yes’ voters backing Scottish Labour

    Herald publishes letter from 100 ‘Yes’ voters backing Scottish Labour

    The Herald today has a letter from 100 people who voted ‘yes’ in the referendum urging voters in Scotland to vote Labour to “get the Tories out”. Included among the signatories are such high profile ‘Yes’ campaigners as Sir Charles Grey and anti-poverty campaigner Bob Holman. Signatories to the letter have expressed concern that Nicola Sturgeon is planning a second referendum and have argued that  “We don’t want to go through that again so soon.” The full text of the […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Cameron is trying to rewrite the constitution to become a Downing Street Squatter

    Cameron is trying to rewrite the constitution to become a Downing Street Squatter

    In 2010, the Sun printed a piece attacking a man “squatting in a luxury home near the Houses of Parliament”. They went on to say that the “squatter” was “refusing to budge from the Georgian townhouse in Downing Street”. That man was Gordon Brown. Yet on Friday, David Cameron is preparing to try and rewrite the constitution to do exactly the same – if not worse. As I wrote at the weekend, all that anyone needs to do come May 8th […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Richard Littlejohn’s latest column: the sickest propaganda yet

    Richard Littlejohn’s latest column: the sickest propaganda yet

    This election has seen an increasingly marginalised print press plumb new depths to try and prove their relevance. From the Times this morning screaming about UNIONS!!! (Or to be more accurate – Labour National Executive Committee will have an emergency meeting following the election) to the Sun vilifying/glorifying the SNP (delete as most appropriate to harm Labour where you live). But this morning one columnist has topped them all. And of course it’s Richard Littlejohn in the Daily Mail. He […]

    Read more →
  • Comment If Labour has the chance to form a government, we will have a constitutional duty to accept

    If Labour has the chance to form a government, we will have a constitutional duty to accept

    We are getting near to the end of what, because the fixed-term Parliament has meant we have always known the Polling Day, feels like a very long election campaign. If a big slice of public opinion Scotland hadn’t decided to prioritise a debate about national identity over one about social justice, the result would be in no doubt – Labour would very clearly be the largest party and might be within touching distance of a majority, particularly as all the […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit