Johann Lamont suggests free university education in Scotland could end

December 18, 2012 10:09 am

In an address at the Mitchell Library in Glasgow, Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont said that state-funded university education was “not viable” without a “serious” reduction in standards. In a wide ranging speech on education to mark her first anniversary as Scottish Labour leader, Lamont said:

“University education is costly, and faces competing claims on limited public resources.”

“Whilst it was possible to sustain a system of publicly-funded higher education in an environment of relatively low participation, this is not viable in an era of mass participation without a very serious diminution in standards and quality.”

“There is no such thing as free higher education – under a completely tax funded tuition system, everybody is forced to pay for it, including those on low incomes.”

That’ final line is not a new argument (it has been used by advocates of tuition fees in England for over a decade), but alongside Lamont’s earlier speech questioning universal benefits, it seems that the Scottish Labour leader is trying to set herself apart from the traditional position of the party in Scotland on universal, free provision.

  • Chilbaldi

    Cybernat countdown! 5…4…3…2…1…

  • AlanGiles

    Time for Lamont to join the Coaltion, perhaps?.

  • robertcp

    Depressing. I would vote SNP if I lived in Scotland.

  • Monkey_Bach

    Well, there’s a tried and tested, vote winning idea for you! Worked out really well for the Tories and the Liberal Democrats didn’t it? Eeek.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100001116515833 Michael Carey

    Is this now policy? Where was it debated and decided?

    • John Ruddy

      Can you point to the policy which she said? I cant read anywhere where she said “Students must pay fees”.

      • rekrab

        She would probably favour a return too “plural voting” but on this form she couldn’t be sure of picking up any of the two votes? Jeez!!!!

  • Amber_Star

    There’s loads of alternatives to fees, if Lamont actually wants to get Labour in a good position on this issue. I think she needs to go & meet people in the CLPs; she should make her case to them & then listen to their responses.

  • JoeDM

    Facing up to reality can sometimes be very difficult.

    • Dave Postles

      US and European universities are attracting the highest-grade performers, as repeated again in a large piece in the education section of today’s [18 October] The Guardian, the former (US Ivy League) because they have full-cost bursaries compared with the pitiable amount in the UK (which is often derogated anyway) and the latter because of the low fees (e.g. Maastricht). Even that supine class of managers, the VCs, are beginning to realise this problem of losing the highest-grade performers. The difficulty again is that young people from low-income social groups are the least likely to avail themselves of these opportunities abroad because it is not within their information field. The intimation seems to be that it is young people from public schools (in the UK sense, not the US) who are dominating these US scholarships, whilst the young people from poorer backgrounds suffer the demise of the UK HE system. No doubt many of them will avoid university altogether in the future and rely on MOOCs, another lesser experience compared with their peers from privileged backgrounds.

  • franwhi

    Why university education ?? Have tuition fees worked to widen access in England ? No !
    I don’t understand the range of this argument. Why is it so limited to certain kinds of Govt spending i.e. social spending and not aspects of defence spending and weapons procurement like Trident for example. Lets put everything on the table and decide then what our spending priorities are otherwise the attack on universal benefits seems more ideological than about savings to the public purse.

  • Redshift1

    Not impressed. The whole point is mass participation means those from low income families actually have a decent chance of going through higher education. Mass participation means that finally university funding out of general taxation is justified. Bizarre that this is the point where we decided that we should start paying fees and disappointing that Labour backed this south of the border. To now see us follow suit north of the border is even more disappointing.

    The Scandinavian countries manage free tuition. Why not us?

    Coming to a general point I’ve heard that I’ll repeat. Most scots are left of centre and pro-union. How hard can it be? Stop trying to use dividing lines with the SNP that lose us votes. They’ve cocked up over independence – why are we now trying to create our own cock up? There is no political gain in this.

    • http://twitter.com/eddyman00 Edward Anderson

      Mass participation has actually led to an increase in the gap between working class people like me (hello… waves) going to uni and middle class people going. The university expansion has expanded the gap between social classes as many jobs which a bright poor person could go into now need a degree which they don’t get due to a) yes, a fear of debt but mainly b) the horrific G.C.S.E results for poor students and the bad subject choices made in later education.

  • Amber_Star

    Students from low income families can’t afford the cost of the trips to the US for tests, interviews etc. And even if they scrape together the money & they succeed in those, the living costs are impossible. A full bursary is only for the fees. You have to provide a bank statement showing that you have $20k (£15k) to pay for travel, visa applications & living costs for the first year; in addition you sign a statement saying that you will provide a $20k statement each year that the bursary continues.

  • uglyfatbloke

    Oh good…another gift to the gnats. How clever is this?

Latest

  • Comment Independence won’t deliver for Scottish women

    Independence won’t deliver for Scottish women

    As the referendum debate in Scotland picks up pace, there is an increased focus on how women will vote. So far, it would seem that women in Scotland are steadfastly resisting Salmond’s overtures. It’s no surprise, given that his central offer for more childcare has been dismissed by the experts, and women are starting to understand that the SNP are being led by polls and not principles. Women are asking why, if the SNP’s commitment to equal representation is real, […]

    Read more →
  • News Weekly survey: Cost of living, elections and devolution

    Weekly survey: Cost of living, elections and devolution

    Average wages are set to rise faster than prices – so is there still a cost of living crisis? Ed Balls says there is, the Tories are arguing that there isn’t. What do you think? And with the European and local elections coming up next month – how much campaigning is going on in your area? And when were you last out on the doorstep? Also in our survey – Ed Miliband has pledged to devolve at least £20 billion to be […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour have a mini reshuffle

    Labour have a mini reshuffle

    Labour have had a very mini pre-Easter reshuffle, with two new role announced. Thomas Docherty, formerly Angela Eagle’s PPS, has become Shadow Deputy Leader of the House, while Angela Smith moves from that position to become a Shadow Environment minister. Congratulations to both on their new roles.

    Read more →
  • News Tory housing shambles: Over budget and behind schedule

    Tory housing shambles: Over budget and behind schedule

    It’s no secret that Britain faces a housing crisis – and new figures show David Cameron’s big plan to “Get Britain Building” is turning out to be an abject failure. The Get Britain Building fund was launched in November 2011 by then-Housing Minister Grant Shapps, who announced £400 million to build 16,000 homes over the next three years. Cameron then relaunched the project in March 2012, with the cost soaring to £570 million and the deadline extended to March 2015. […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Walk on, with hope in your heart

    Walk on, with hope in your heart

    Today our thoughts are first and foremost with the families of the victims of the Hillsborough disaster. Today will be difficult for them. It marks 25 years since 96 innocent men, women and children were killed at the Hillsborough football stadium in Sheffield. It marks 25 years since the orchestrated campaign to denigrate the memory of the deceased began. And it marks 25 years of totally preventable pain, anguish and heartache for the families of the victims and the survivors of that fateful crush. […]

    Read more →