“Ideas and action, theory and practice, one without the other has little impact”

January 15, 2013 2:18 pm

[Today we launched our first pamphlet "One Nation Labour - debating the future", edited by Jon Cruddas MP, which you can download here. This is Jon's introduction:]

We had a tremendous response to the One Nation Labour debate on LabourList. Over fifty contributors and tens of thousands of hits have helped open up Labour’s Policy Review to wider involvement.

The Policy Review is about constructing policy for 2015 and the structure and process for doing this are both up and running with three Shadow cabinet sub-groups each responsible for one of the three themes of the review: One Nation Economy, One Nation Society and One Nation Politics.

Each of these themes is broken down into work streams around specific policy objectives, overseen by a Shadow Minister. This core activity of policy making is framed by the larger story of One Nation Labour and its priorities and values. The story determines the policies we construct and in turn the policies define the story of One Nation Labour.

Integral to this process is reform of the party and the integration of the policy review into its structure. Labour needs to develop a culture of participation and involvement and become a party of political organising that begins with the value of people’s relationships with one another. To be effective it must also be a learning and knowledge making organisation.

Ideas and action, theory and practice, one without the other has little impact.

To meet the challenges ahead Labour needs to broker new and durable alliances across civil society, developing its digital communications and initiating and sustaining campaigns that build up its capacity for electoral success. To achieve this, the policy review cannot just be an internal affair of the party nor can it wrap itself up in our own jargon and preoccupations. We need to go to where the people are and listen deeply to what they are saying, not just to the things we want to hear about banks and bonuses but to what we find difficult to hear, for example people’s sense of the unfairness of the welfare system and the recent years of immigration. And we need to respond to people’s concerns by creating public debates that engage with the issues. In the process we will define One Nation Labour and the political life of the country.

The contributors in this ebook offer ideas and themes for this debate which, in the year ahead, needs to grow and take shape both in and beyond the party.

In 2013 the Policy Review will be building the story of One Nation Labour and creating the policies that will give it detail and substance. There will be seminars and conferences, debates about political philosophy, political economy and the condition of Britain, and there will be discussions on specific policy priorities. Integral to this activity will be campaigning and community based organising. Labour’s new website Your Britain (see below) provides a means for people to get involved.

If we are to be effective we will need two vital ingredients: people’s energy and their enterprise. Out of these will grow new initiatives, a sense of hope and a belief that Labour can make real change for the better in people’s lives. It might mean for example starting up a blog or website, organising a local reading group or house meeting on One Nation politics or a public event or campaign, reaching out to community groups and other political organisations to establish campaigning alliances and helping develop local leadership.

Small is important, begin locally – relationships come first then the politics. As Iain McNicol says in his article in this ebook the Labour Party needs a huge culture change. People’s fear of doing the wrong thing – or their anxiety about upsetting the status quo – will be the biggest obstacles to the change we need.

Our ambition is to build a country in which everyone feels that they have a stake, and where prosperity is fairly shared. It will be one in which we conserve our common life by valuing and reforming the institutions that bind us together. This is a big ambition and we will need to take the best of Old Labour and New Labour to develop a One Nation politics.

First, it is a politics that is both radical and conservative. We organise for change to conserve the good in people and in society. It means looking after and protecting what matters in peoples lives – a sense of belonging, self-esteem, relationships, family, local place, social security. It also means reform to bring to account vested interests and activities that are damaging to society (for example the banks, tax evasion, loan sharks, bad private landlords, and the energy markets). Our institutions both private and public should work for the common good.

Second, it is the practice of a democratic politics of the common good. The common good is not some pre-existing idea imposed on people by a ruling elite or a domineering state. It is the agreement of a common ground reached between different groups and interests that is the outcome of deliberation. The politics of the common good negotiates the distribution of power in society and the economy with the aim of making sure that no one interest or group dominates over others. It is the basic practice of politics: a democratic process that is never completed and always contingent .

Third, the politics of the common good is governed by reciprocity. Reciprocity is the bond of trust that holds together both society and the market. It is an ethic of give and take which establishes a sense of equality and justice in relationships. The unjust person is ‘the one who takes too much in terms of advantages or not enough in terms of burdens’. It is not just the give and take of rights and obligations , but also the moral imperative that one does not do to others what one does not want done to one’s self.

Fourth, it is a politics of being together. The traditional phrases were solidarity and fraternity but neither work well for the changes in our country. Solidarity calls upon an underlying shared identity which no longer has the same broad reach in our post industrial, plural and diverse society. Fraternity in contrast does emphasise a diversity amongst equals but it is a sentiment that excludes the political relationship between men and women and between women. The politics of togetherness is a way of talking about the ‘we’ while holding to the uniqueness of each individual. It emphasises how our individual freedom is secured by the equality of constraint we share.

As Ed has described in his Fabian speech on One Nation Labour, it is an idea rooted in the history of the country. One Nation politics belongs to the Labour movement’s traditions of collective self help, co-operativism and self improvement. It values these traditions as the basis for building a hopeful future which will include everyone as citizens in the life of the country. The inclusion of all and the recognition of the worth and contribution of each is the meaning of One Nation.

The Conservative tradition has been a powerful national force. In spite of its paternalism, it gave many people meaning, value and a sense of belonging by respecting their place in the hierarchical order of property and status. It is a tradition in danger of extinction in today’s Conservative Party which is ideologically dominated by the inheritors of the free market liberalism of the Thatcher Revolution. But for all its good, One Nation Conservatism grew out of the landed interest and relied on class privilege and deference to secure its power. In contrast, the Labour One Nation tradition grew out of the Labour interest and the popular aspiration for self determination and democracy. Its extraordinary historical energy powered the best in modernity by giving working people a place at the common table and representation in the government of the country. It is time to reassert the right of working people to that representation and the obligations which go with it.

The Policy Review has started the One Nation Register detailing events and links to articles contributing ideas to the policy review. If you would like to subscribe to it, please email, onenationregister@gmail.com.

To get involved in the Policy Review go to Your Britain, Labour’s policy hub at www.yourbritain.org.uk

Jon Cruddas MP, January 2013

You can download “One Nation Labour – debating the future”, edited by Jon Cruddas MP here

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Daniel-Smith/516168738 Daniel Smith

    This all sounds like an echo chamber. We are in opposition, we should – as a drama workshop teacher told me – be a good audience. The coalition must be riddled with division, we must be a safe pair of hands to catch the ball.

  • AlanGiles

    Oh dear!. Jon – how about more
    substance and less rhetoric. Or to quote Gertrude in Hamlet Act 2
    Scene 2 “More matter with less art,”.

    As for the long-windedness of Crudas’s prose – from the same scene remember what Polonious said?
    “Brevity is the soul of wit”. This essay displays neither. And for God’s sake can we get away from this silly catchphrase. Whenever have we had “one nation”?. While we continue to have “VIP areas” at every tacky pop concert, suggesting some people are more “important” than others, and while we have politicians who really believe everybody should “play by the rules” – with the exception of themselves of course, we will NEVER be “one nation”. You make yourselves look ridiculous and incredible by promising what you cannot deliver.

  • Amber_Star

    Who chose the incredibly irritating font that this pamphlet is printed in?

    • AlanGiles

      You can’t beat Times Roman or Baskerville for a good established honest look,or Gill Sans if you want to give a clean more modern appearance but the fact Amber that you mention the typeface I think is important. If the reading matter was more worthwhile, more gripping, nobody would notice the typeface (unless they had used something bizarre like Albertus Titling throughout, or possibly even Comic sans – I’ll say nothing else about that!.)

      As I went through the booklet I kept hearing the voice of the late Harry Secombe singing “If I Ruled The World” – you know, every day would be the first day of spring, there’d be happiness and a new song to sing…etc etc.

      What genuinely angers me about this “One Nation” claptrap is the fact that we all know that it just isn’t possible, and never has been – and never will be, especially while politicians regard themselves as being above the rules and laws they devise for everybody else.

      it is just a slogan – with about as much meaning as “Persil washes whiter” or “the DFS half price sale is now on”.

      Also the fact that Labour was last week dividing up the have-nots, with special emphasis on “the strivers” (as a retired person I am obviously not striving any more, but then I am not a have-not), but politicians of all parties choose to make divisions between people who are, or should be, on the same side.

      Given the fact that Mr Crudas can never resist using four words when one would do, and that smug self-satisfied smirk at the top of this article, the make-believe world he is trying to pretend will exist seems even more bogus, and, frankly one great con-trick.

  • Monkey_Bach

    That’s an awful lot of wistfully favourable mentions of Conservative/conservatism in an article about a “radical” future for the Labour Party. To be honest the article sounds just like the nebulous and meaningless “Big Society” nonsense slippery Tories used to rant on about during Cameron’s “hug a hoodie” glory days, trying to persuade the electorate that the now Prime Minister was oxymoronically a “compassionate Conservative” rather than a cruel and heartless villain planning to covertly raze the welfare state to the ground. And we all know now how that ended don’t we? Eeek.

  • http://twitter.com/waterwards dave stone

    “conserve our common life”

    Can’t see that there’s much of it left to be conserved – unless you’re referring to our position as hapless beneficiaries/victims of an unaccountable globalised economy.

    As demonstrated by Labour’s ideologically motivated shredding of the NHS*, what does remain of our ‘One Nation’ common life needs to be protected from both Tory and Labour politicians.

    * http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Plot-Against-Stewart-Player/dp/0850366798/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1358278518&sr=8-1

  • AlanGiles

    In the spirit of the “One Nation” codswallop, here is a suggestion for you. How about appointing a rentaquote Minister For The Bl**ding Obvious. From today’s (16th Jan) “Metro”


    Step forward Mr Umnuna, not unknown for casting such pearls of wisdom:

    “Shadow business secretary Chuka Umunna told Metro: ‘Customers who have HMV gift cards and vouchers will be hugely disappointed and concerned they are now unable to use them.”

    No Chuka – you don’t say! But what insight, what depth…….

  • Pingback: Len, Conflict and One Nation | Hopi Sen

  • Pingback: Labour’s ‘One Nation’ Dead-End | Notes from a Discrete Continent


  • Comment Freelancing needs a policy agenda of its own

    Freelancing needs a policy agenda of its own

    The self employed are often the ‘most entrepreneurial, go-getting people in Britain’ . That is what Ed Milliband said during his conference speech when he placed a commitment to the self employed and albeit freelance workers at the heart of his election pledges for the general election. One of Labour’s six pledges is to provide equal rights to the self employment. As Ed Mililband noted ‘two out of three don’t have a pension, one in five can’t get a mortgage. […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Cameron’s pledge to scrap the Human Rights Act shows he’s legally illiterate

    Cameron’s pledge to scrap the Human Rights Act shows he’s legally illiterate

    In a crowded field, there is one issue which can always evoke splenetic outrage in the Daily Mail and the Tory backbenches: the Human Rights Act. And so it came as no surprise that its abolition ‘once and for all’ formed an integral part of David Cameron’s speech to the Tory conference. He had a simple pitch: the UK government is being told what to do, not by its own Courts but by Strasbourg. So we need a British Bill […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Cameron’s Tax Cut is a Tax Con – but it’ll be popular, and highlights Labour’s missed opportunity

    Cameron’s Tax Cut is a Tax Con – but it’ll be popular, and highlights Labour’s missed opportunity

    David Cameron’s conference speech today was well-delivered, punchy and memorable. It had a clear top line to grab the evening news headlines, and his populist tax cuts will be the overwhelming focus of tomorrow’s front pages. This was cheese to Miliband’s chalk. Whilst the Labour leader appeared to lack energy last week, and his headline announcement leaked in advance (and wasn’t sufficiently headline-grabbing to grab headlines), Cameron was surprisingly pumped up, energetic and forceful. He was also doling out policy like […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Dismantling Britain’s despotism

    Dismantling Britain’s despotism

    The fictional town of Dunchester is the scene for a right-wing science-fiction novel by nineteenth century author H. Rider Haggard. It is also the site for a fantasy game used to recruit and train British civil servants. The Tory novel is about radicals trying to block experts and professionals from saving Dunchester from an epidemic of plague. The civil service game allows players to spend £20 million in regenerating a fake town with the same name. Players take the role […]

    Read more →
  • News Video “This is who we resent” – David Cameron lets slip what he actually thinks

    “This is who we resent” – David Cameron lets slip what he actually thinks

    Unfortunate Freudian slip for David Cameron during his Conference speech today: “This party is the trade union for children from the poorest estates and the most chaotic homes; this party is the union for the young woman who wants an apprenticeship; teenagers who want to make something of their lives – this is who we resent.”

    Read more →