Why do Nick Clegg’s mistakes irk me as much as they do?

3rd January, 2013 11:02 am

Nick Clegg has started the New Year as he means to go on – further tying himself and his hapless Party to the fortunes of George Osborne’s failed economics and torpedoing his own differentiation strategy. His article in yesterdays’ Times (£) set out how the coalition plan to target Labour over the coming year (clue: the same way they’ve been doing over the last year – with the increasingly unimaginative “What would Labour cut?” question which I have addressed elsewhere.)

It is getting harder and harder not to believe that Nick Clegg is just an idiot. I don’t want to believe that. I find it hard that anyone can achieve what he has personally and still be quite such an idiot. Perhaps Clegg is the ultimate example of how unmeritocratic our society really is. All that education, all those connections and yet, in the end, here he is boxed into a corner made of his own idiocy, and every move he makes is so obviously wrong. Nick Clegg speaks five languages. He can probably write clichés like “We must all pay the piper in the end” in Dutch, German, Spanish and French. But still doesn’t seem to have learned how to say “no”!

His piece in the Times is everything the differentiation strategy was supposed to reverse. It ties the Lib Dems so firmly to the mast of Osborne’s failing economic strategy that the “lines to take” have clearly come from the Treasury. It’s the kind of full-throated defence of the Government’s strategy that will make it impossible for Clegg to lead a Lib Dem party that would have any ability to change its mind on these issues post-election. They become further and further boxed into the Conservatives corner, with a Party who increasingly resent their very presence.

Clegg litters the article with supposed achievements. The Government’s oft repeated claim of paying of around a quarter of the deficit gets a look in despite the fact that this is contested. The one that caught my eye was the claim that they were “Boosting house building”. Nick, Mate, when your own Think Tank allies are producing reports saying you could preside over the lowest level of house building since the 1920s then it’s time to quietly put those claims away. It wasn’t needed and it makes you look – well – like an idiot.

But, as Obi Wan Kenobe almost said: Who’s the more foolish? The fool, or the Party that follows him? Nick Clegg isn’t alone in his idiocy. He has a well-oiled machine stood right beside him ready to amplify his every mistake. The Liberal Democrat Parliamentary Party are the political equivalent of Jonestown: wrongly convinced of their moral superiority, wrongly convinced of their revolutionary place in history and awaiting a massacre.

At the moment, David Cameron is in more danger of being defenestrated than Nick Clegg. And while it’s right that the Lib Dems shouldn’t move too quickly to rid themselves of Clegg, that only remains true if they can reign him in a bit and stop him doing so much damage to their electoral prospects, and their much-vaunted but little displayed equidistance and differentiation. No wonder even the Soft Left of Labour have hardened in their tribalism. It is all too easy to say to the Lib Dems “We’ll have your voters, not your leaders” as they keep shoving them towards us.

I can’t work out why Nick Clegg’s mistakes irk me as much as they do. They are nothing but a gift for Labour. As a true Partisan, I delight in that. But in the meantime, Clegg keeps failing. And as he does so, so does any chance to actually stop some of the damage of the Coalition. The Lib Dems aren’t going to go into 2015 with a triumph under their belts. Their Tory buddies have seen to that. They won’t have reformed voting or abolished the House of Lords. But equally they won’t be able to really point to any part of the nastier parts of coalition policy and say “we stopped that”. On the NHS, Welfare reform even economic policy, the Lib Dem tinkering around the edges has been little more than putting a doily on the turd a vandal took in the living room. It has changed nothing.

When the historians come to write of this time in Government, the missed opportunities squandered by a Party who had been out of power for so long will come to be seen as one of the most stunning political mistakes of this age. Nick Clegg can attack Labour “carping” all he wants – but he’s a young man who will have to live with his failures for a very long time. Carping will be the least of his worries.

  • Amber_Star

    @ Nick Clegg
    What would Labour cut to pay for social security indexing to inflation? Perhaps Labour would have had the bottle to bring in a mansion tax… you know, the mansion tax which you promised you’d demand before agreeing to social security cuts.

    • John Ruddy

      Nice one!

  • Chilbaldi

    Really excellent article Emma. I agree with you. Partcularly the Obi Wan Kenobi (Only Vince Cansavethee?) reference

  • Brumanuensis

    I find Nick Clegg increasingly pathetic, in the original sense of the word. I was never his greatest admirer, even in the heady days of 2009/10 when people on the soft left – as I was and am – like Neal Lawson, were busy chuntering away about the end of tribalism and how we must embrace the Lib Dems to save the progressive left. Sir Brian Barder did a similar line of articles on this website after the election (that’s not a jab at Sir Brian, a man I have a lot of respect for; it’s just an observation about the time).

    But the Lib Dems did actually seem like the principled party back then. I’m not a liberal, but I appreciated the criticism of the Brown government’s frequently ill-considered security legislation, as well as its disgraceful record on child detention. Similarly, on the environment and economic policy, the Lib Dems often had – and occasionally still have – worthwhile suggestions. There were always warning signs about their likely intentions, but the siren song was attractive enough none-the-less.

    As for now, Clegg isn’t an idiot, but he’s too unimaginative to extricate himself from his position. My reading is that he simply misjudged Cameron and assumed that his Party could deflect blame for unpopular policies onto the Conservatives. This proved an error and one he is paying for.

    I can’t see Clegg recovering from this – the Lib Dems are another matter – because he’s reached that stage, like with Blair in 2006/7 and Brown by 2010, of being definitively framed in the public mind. Clegg is seen as a sad, insincere joke. He’s no longer even hated or disliked; he’s just pitied and pity is an analogue of contempt. And contempt is lethal for any politician.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Graeme-Hancocks/1156294498 Graeme Hancocks

      Quite.

    • Chilbaldi

      I agree except for one point – Clegg is an idiot. Or at the very least, someone completely incapable of knowing how to speak to the public or convince the public on an issue. Cleggmania ™ was luck, pure chance on his part.
      For example I was watching BBC Parliament recently (yes, I am that sad) when Clegg was at the despatch box. He was answering Parliamentary questions in his standard, middle manager, The Office-esque way of doing so, when he went off on a tangent. Some slightly libertarian tory asked him an ideologically charged question and Clegg proceeded to go off on a tangent, explaining to the public the differences between liberalism and libertarianism.
      Seriously. Not a clue. You’d think he was in a university tutorial, not in Parliament. I can only conclude that he is such an idiot that his brain is incapable of adapting to different situations.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Graeme-Hancocks/1156294498 Graeme Hancocks

    I would think most people find Clegg as irksome as you, Emma. In fact most people stopped listening to him two years ago. He is appalling.

  • billbat

    It seems that Nick Clegg is in a safe seat , won from the Tories, and with the Tories in second place so doesn’t have the same sense of impending doom as thirty five other Lib-Dem MP’s, so is able to repeat the Tory Mantra. I can’t see why Beaker is so Pro-Osbornomics though.

Latest

  • Comment Would calling for a ban on private school be electoral suicide?

    Would calling for a ban on private school be electoral suicide?

    If I’d had a vote in the last election I wouldn’t have voted Labour. I thought its flagship policies were too boring. Any government will invest money, regulate business and adjust taxes to nudge Britain in the direction it wants. Freezing energy bills may have been a good course of action, but what will win my vote are the policies that make a lasting impact. For me, Labour’s choice of leader is insignificant if the party’s biggest promises aren’t reformist […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs its centre-left more than ever

    Labour needs its centre-left more than ever

    I’ve decided who I am voting for, but for a lot of this campaign I’ve wanted to abstain, or go on holiday. It has been a pretty difficult time to be on the centre-left of the Labour Party . The quality has been low, and nobody fully reflects people on what we might call ‘the soft left’. Lots of people I respect, generally from the left of the party in some shape or form, have been hugely inspired during the Corbyn […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Sajid Javid could be the sign the electorate is looking for that the Tory party has shed its ‘nasty party’ reputation

    Sajid Javid could be the sign the electorate is looking for that the Tory party has shed its ‘nasty party’ reputation

    This article is from the new Progress pamphlet ‘Face-off’, examining the potential successors to David Cameron as Conservative leader. You can read the full pamphlet here. Few leaders inspire true fear in their opponents. Those that do, do so because they force people to think again about the party they represent. Britain’s most electorally successful politicians, Tony Blair and Margaret Thatcher, were able to reach such heights because they confounded the electorate’s expectations: Blair believed that wealth creation was not […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Tony Blair hits out at Corbyn’s “politics of parallel reality”

    Tony Blair hits out at Corbyn’s “politics of parallel reality”

    Tony Blair has made a new intervention in the Labour leadership contest with an article in today’s Observer, which the paper has splashed with on the front page: The former Labour Prime Minister confesses that he doesn’t “get” frontrunner Jeremy Corbyn’s popularity, but claims that he is “trying hard” to understand it, and compares it to similar waves of support for Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders in the US presidential race. Blair also says he appreciates that his advice against […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Unions Anti-trade union legislation could face legal challenge for contravening human rights

    Anti-trade union legislation could face legal challenge for contravening human rights

    Shadow Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is ready to raise the prospect of challenging the Tories’ proposed anti-trade union laws in the courts, claiming it might contravene human rights legislation. Cooper says she has received legal advice that points to potential breaches of Article 11 of the European Convention of Human Rights, which preserves the right of freedom of association, including trade unions. The leadership contender will accuse the Conservatives of trying to use their position to cripple the opposition with […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit