Why do Nick Clegg’s mistakes irk me as much as they do?

3rd January, 2013 11:02 am

Nick Clegg has started the New Year as he means to go on – further tying himself and his hapless Party to the fortunes of George Osborne’s failed economics and torpedoing his own differentiation strategy. His article in yesterdays’ Times (£) set out how the coalition plan to target Labour over the coming year (clue: the same way they’ve been doing over the last year – with the increasingly unimaginative “What would Labour cut?” question which I have addressed elsewhere.)

It is getting harder and harder not to believe that Nick Clegg is just an idiot. I don’t want to believe that. I find it hard that anyone can achieve what he has personally and still be quite such an idiot. Perhaps Clegg is the ultimate example of how unmeritocratic our society really is. All that education, all those connections and yet, in the end, here he is boxed into a corner made of his own idiocy, and every move he makes is so obviously wrong. Nick Clegg speaks five languages. He can probably write clichés like “We must all pay the piper in the end” in Dutch, German, Spanish and French. But still doesn’t seem to have learned how to say “no”!

His piece in the Times is everything the differentiation strategy was supposed to reverse. It ties the Lib Dems so firmly to the mast of Osborne’s failing economic strategy that the “lines to take” have clearly come from the Treasury. It’s the kind of full-throated defence of the Government’s strategy that will make it impossible for Clegg to lead a Lib Dem party that would have any ability to change its mind on these issues post-election. They become further and further boxed into the Conservatives corner, with a Party who increasingly resent their very presence.

Clegg litters the article with supposed achievements. The Government’s oft repeated claim of paying of around a quarter of the deficit gets a look in despite the fact that this is contested. The one that caught my eye was the claim that they were “Boosting house building”. Nick, Mate, when your own Think Tank allies are producing reports saying you could preside over the lowest level of house building since the 1920s then it’s time to quietly put those claims away. It wasn’t needed and it makes you look – well – like an idiot.

But, as Obi Wan Kenobe almost said: Who’s the more foolish? The fool, or the Party that follows him? Nick Clegg isn’t alone in his idiocy. He has a well-oiled machine stood right beside him ready to amplify his every mistake. The Liberal Democrat Parliamentary Party are the political equivalent of Jonestown: wrongly convinced of their moral superiority, wrongly convinced of their revolutionary place in history and awaiting a massacre.

At the moment, David Cameron is in more danger of being defenestrated than Nick Clegg. And while it’s right that the Lib Dems shouldn’t move too quickly to rid themselves of Clegg, that only remains true if they can reign him in a bit and stop him doing so much damage to their electoral prospects, and their much-vaunted but little displayed equidistance and differentiation. No wonder even the Soft Left of Labour have hardened in their tribalism. It is all too easy to say to the Lib Dems “We’ll have your voters, not your leaders” as they keep shoving them towards us.

I can’t work out why Nick Clegg’s mistakes irk me as much as they do. They are nothing but a gift for Labour. As a true Partisan, I delight in that. But in the meantime, Clegg keeps failing. And as he does so, so does any chance to actually stop some of the damage of the Coalition. The Lib Dems aren’t going to go into 2015 with a triumph under their belts. Their Tory buddies have seen to that. They won’t have reformed voting or abolished the House of Lords. But equally they won’t be able to really point to any part of the nastier parts of coalition policy and say “we stopped that”. On the NHS, Welfare reform even economic policy, the Lib Dem tinkering around the edges has been little more than putting a doily on the turd a vandal took in the living room. It has changed nothing.

When the historians come to write of this time in Government, the missed opportunities squandered by a Party who had been out of power for so long will come to be seen as one of the most stunning political mistakes of this age. Nick Clegg can attack Labour “carping” all he wants – but he’s a young man who will have to live with his failures for a very long time. Carping will be the least of his worries.

  • Amber_Star

    @ Nick Clegg
    What would Labour cut to pay for social security indexing to inflation? Perhaps Labour would have had the bottle to bring in a mansion tax… you know, the mansion tax which you promised you’d demand before agreeing to social security cuts.

    • John Ruddy

      Nice one!

  • Chilbaldi

    Really excellent article Emma. I agree with you. Partcularly the Obi Wan Kenobi (Only Vince Cansavethee?) reference

  • Brumanuensis

    I find Nick Clegg increasingly pathetic, in the original sense of the word. I was never his greatest admirer, even in the heady days of 2009/10 when people on the soft left – as I was and am – like Neal Lawson, were busy chuntering away about the end of tribalism and how we must embrace the Lib Dems to save the progressive left. Sir Brian Barder did a similar line of articles on this website after the election (that’s not a jab at Sir Brian, a man I have a lot of respect for; it’s just an observation about the time).

    But the Lib Dems did actually seem like the principled party back then. I’m not a liberal, but I appreciated the criticism of the Brown government’s frequently ill-considered security legislation, as well as its disgraceful record on child detention. Similarly, on the environment and economic policy, the Lib Dems often had – and occasionally still have – worthwhile suggestions. There were always warning signs about their likely intentions, but the siren song was attractive enough none-the-less.

    As for now, Clegg isn’t an idiot, but he’s too unimaginative to extricate himself from his position. My reading is that he simply misjudged Cameron and assumed that his Party could deflect blame for unpopular policies onto the Conservatives. This proved an error and one he is paying for.

    I can’t see Clegg recovering from this – the Lib Dems are another matter – because he’s reached that stage, like with Blair in 2006/7 and Brown by 2010, of being definitively framed in the public mind. Clegg is seen as a sad, insincere joke. He’s no longer even hated or disliked; he’s just pitied and pity is an analogue of contempt. And contempt is lethal for any politician.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Graeme-Hancocks/1156294498 Graeme Hancocks

      Quite.

    • Chilbaldi

      I agree except for one point – Clegg is an idiot. Or at the very least, someone completely incapable of knowing how to speak to the public or convince the public on an issue. Cleggmania ™ was luck, pure chance on his part.
      For example I was watching BBC Parliament recently (yes, I am that sad) when Clegg was at the despatch box. He was answering Parliamentary questions in his standard, middle manager, The Office-esque way of doing so, when he went off on a tangent. Some slightly libertarian tory asked him an ideologically charged question and Clegg proceeded to go off on a tangent, explaining to the public the differences between liberalism and libertarianism.
      Seriously. Not a clue. You’d think he was in a university tutorial, not in Parliament. I can only conclude that he is such an idiot that his brain is incapable of adapting to different situations.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Graeme-Hancocks/1156294498 Graeme Hancocks

    I would think most people find Clegg as irksome as you, Emma. In fact most people stopped listening to him two years ago. He is appalling.

  • billbat

    It seems that Nick Clegg is in a safe seat , won from the Tories, and with the Tories in second place so doesn’t have the same sense of impending doom as thirty five other Lib-Dem MP’s, so is able to repeat the Tory Mantra. I can’t see why Beaker is so Pro-Osbornomics though.

Latest

  • Featured News Unite back Jeremy Corbyn to be Labour leader – with Andy Burnham as second preference

    Unite back Jeremy Corbyn to be Labour leader – with Andy Burnham as second preference

    Unite the Union has announced that they are backing Jeremy Corbyn to be Labour’s next leader. The union, one of the biggest in the country, have come to this decision following a debate of the union’s executive committee (which is made an elected body of 63 men and women from workplaces across the UK). This comes after a multi-union hustings on June 30th and consultation with members’ elected representatives from across the union. The union will tell members that the […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Shadow Chancellor: Labour’s aim should be to run a surplus in normal times

    Shadow Chancellor: Labour’s aim should be to run a surplus in normal times

    Chris Leslie has said Labour’s aim should be to run a surplus in “normal times”. In an interview with the Sunday Times, the Shadow Chancellor argued that this was important for Labour to gain economic credibility: “This notion that Labour just wants to throw money at issues, that’s not where we should be at all. I think Labour should aim to run a surplus in normal times if the economic circumstances allow. We’re past £1.5 trillion in terms of national […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured To win in 2020, we need to beat UKIP in the south as well as the north

    To win in 2020, we need to beat UKIP in the south as well as the north

    We know that we’ve got our work cut out to win a Labour majority government in 2020. Without a major recovery in Scotland we’ll need to win around 100 additional seats in England and Wales in less than 5 years’ time on an average swing of around 10%. We must take almost all these constituencies from the Conservatives because there are next to no Lib Dem seats left to squeeze. And, as I’ve set out before, we can’t tackle the […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Defeat doesn’t make us defunct

    Defeat doesn’t make us defunct

    It’s frustrating when protests and demonstrations are shrugged of as a meaningless waste of time and those who pick up a placard and participate are faced with accusations of ‘disillusionment’ and of being ‘sore losers’. The thousands of people who took to the streets of London (and in cities across the country) on June 20th had every right to do so. Yes, Labour suffered a cataclysmic defeat at the ballot box resulting in the Conservatives prevailing as the ‘winning’ party […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured The EU Referendum could do to Labour in England what the independence referendum did in Scotland

    The EU Referendum could do to Labour in England what the independence referendum did in Scotland

    The issue of Europe rarely stirs Labour’s soul. The current attitude of ‘we’re moderately pro mainly because the antis come across as a bunch of swivel-eyed fruitcakes’, has not served Labour badly, partly because it chimes with the majority view. Despite two decades of daily derision and drip-feed EU hostility from a small group of mostly foreign media-owning billionaires, poll after poll has shown a majority in favour of staying. But while leadership contenders tiptoe cautiously round this subject, in […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit