Why do Nick Clegg’s mistakes irk me as much as they do?

3rd January, 2013 11:02 am

Nick Clegg has started the New Year as he means to go on – further tying himself and his hapless Party to the fortunes of George Osborne’s failed economics and torpedoing his own differentiation strategy. His article in yesterdays’ Times (£) set out how the coalition plan to target Labour over the coming year (clue: the same way they’ve been doing over the last year – with the increasingly unimaginative “What would Labour cut?” question which I have addressed elsewhere.)

It is getting harder and harder not to believe that Nick Clegg is just an idiot. I don’t want to believe that. I find it hard that anyone can achieve what he has personally and still be quite such an idiot. Perhaps Clegg is the ultimate example of how unmeritocratic our society really is. All that education, all those connections and yet, in the end, here he is boxed into a corner made of his own idiocy, and every move he makes is so obviously wrong. Nick Clegg speaks five languages. He can probably write clichés like “We must all pay the piper in the end” in Dutch, German, Spanish and French. But still doesn’t seem to have learned how to say “no”!

His piece in the Times is everything the differentiation strategy was supposed to reverse. It ties the Lib Dems so firmly to the mast of Osborne’s failing economic strategy that the “lines to take” have clearly come from the Treasury. It’s the kind of full-throated defence of the Government’s strategy that will make it impossible for Clegg to lead a Lib Dem party that would have any ability to change its mind on these issues post-election. They become further and further boxed into the Conservatives corner, with a Party who increasingly resent their very presence.

Clegg litters the article with supposed achievements. The Government’s oft repeated claim of paying of around a quarter of the deficit gets a look in despite the fact that this is contested. The one that caught my eye was the claim that they were “Boosting house building”. Nick, Mate, when your own Think Tank allies are producing reports saying you could preside over the lowest level of house building since the 1920s then it’s time to quietly put those claims away. It wasn’t needed and it makes you look – well – like an idiot.

But, as Obi Wan Kenobe almost said: Who’s the more foolish? The fool, or the Party that follows him? Nick Clegg isn’t alone in his idiocy. He has a well-oiled machine stood right beside him ready to amplify his every mistake. The Liberal Democrat Parliamentary Party are the political equivalent of Jonestown: wrongly convinced of their moral superiority, wrongly convinced of their revolutionary place in history and awaiting a massacre.

At the moment, David Cameron is in more danger of being defenestrated than Nick Clegg. And while it’s right that the Lib Dems shouldn’t move too quickly to rid themselves of Clegg, that only remains true if they can reign him in a bit and stop him doing so much damage to their electoral prospects, and their much-vaunted but little displayed equidistance and differentiation. No wonder even the Soft Left of Labour have hardened in their tribalism. It is all too easy to say to the Lib Dems “We’ll have your voters, not your leaders” as they keep shoving them towards us.

I can’t work out why Nick Clegg’s mistakes irk me as much as they do. They are nothing but a gift for Labour. As a true Partisan, I delight in that. But in the meantime, Clegg keeps failing. And as he does so, so does any chance to actually stop some of the damage of the Coalition. The Lib Dems aren’t going to go into 2015 with a triumph under their belts. Their Tory buddies have seen to that. They won’t have reformed voting or abolished the House of Lords. But equally they won’t be able to really point to any part of the nastier parts of coalition policy and say “we stopped that”. On the NHS, Welfare reform even economic policy, the Lib Dem tinkering around the edges has been little more than putting a doily on the turd a vandal took in the living room. It has changed nothing.

When the historians come to write of this time in Government, the missed opportunities squandered by a Party who had been out of power for so long will come to be seen as one of the most stunning political mistakes of this age. Nick Clegg can attack Labour “carping” all he wants – but he’s a young man who will have to live with his failures for a very long time. Carping will be the least of his worries.

  • Amber_Star

    @ Nick Clegg
    What would Labour cut to pay for social security indexing to inflation? Perhaps Labour would have had the bottle to bring in a mansion tax… you know, the mansion tax which you promised you’d demand before agreeing to social security cuts.

    • John Ruddy

      Nice one!

  • Chilbaldi

    Really excellent article Emma. I agree with you. Partcularly the Obi Wan Kenobi (Only Vince Cansavethee?) reference

  • Brumanuensis

    I find Nick Clegg increasingly pathetic, in the original sense of the word. I was never his greatest admirer, even in the heady days of 2009/10 when people on the soft left – as I was and am – like Neal Lawson, were busy chuntering away about the end of tribalism and how we must embrace the Lib Dems to save the progressive left. Sir Brian Barder did a similar line of articles on this website after the election (that’s not a jab at Sir Brian, a man I have a lot of respect for; it’s just an observation about the time).

    But the Lib Dems did actually seem like the principled party back then. I’m not a liberal, but I appreciated the criticism of the Brown government’s frequently ill-considered security legislation, as well as its disgraceful record on child detention. Similarly, on the environment and economic policy, the Lib Dems often had – and occasionally still have – worthwhile suggestions. There were always warning signs about their likely intentions, but the siren song was attractive enough none-the-less.

    As for now, Clegg isn’t an idiot, but he’s too unimaginative to extricate himself from his position. My reading is that he simply misjudged Cameron and assumed that his Party could deflect blame for unpopular policies onto the Conservatives. This proved an error and one he is paying for.

    I can’t see Clegg recovering from this – the Lib Dems are another matter – because he’s reached that stage, like with Blair in 2006/7 and Brown by 2010, of being definitively framed in the public mind. Clegg is seen as a sad, insincere joke. He’s no longer even hated or disliked; he’s just pitied and pity is an analogue of contempt. And contempt is lethal for any politician.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Graeme-Hancocks/1156294498 Graeme Hancocks

      Quite.

    • Chilbaldi

      I agree except for one point – Clegg is an idiot. Or at the very least, someone completely incapable of knowing how to speak to the public or convince the public on an issue. Cleggmania ™ was luck, pure chance on his part.
      For example I was watching BBC Parliament recently (yes, I am that sad) when Clegg was at the despatch box. He was answering Parliamentary questions in his standard, middle manager, The Office-esque way of doing so, when he went off on a tangent. Some slightly libertarian tory asked him an ideologically charged question and Clegg proceeded to go off on a tangent, explaining to the public the differences between liberalism and libertarianism.
      Seriously. Not a clue. You’d think he was in a university tutorial, not in Parliament. I can only conclude that he is such an idiot that his brain is incapable of adapting to different situations.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Graeme-Hancocks/1156294498 Graeme Hancocks

    I would think most people find Clegg as irksome as you, Emma. In fact most people stopped listening to him two years ago. He is appalling.

  • billbat

    It seems that Nick Clegg is in a safe seat , won from the Tories, and with the Tories in second place so doesn’t have the same sense of impending doom as thirty five other Lib-Dem MP’s, so is able to repeat the Tory Mantra. I can’t see why Beaker is so Pro-Osbornomics though.

Latest

  • Comment The truth is that South Thanet should never have been blue – let alone in danger of turning purple

    The truth is that South Thanet should never have been blue – let alone in danger of turning purple

    There’s a lot of interest in the exact Dulux colour composition of Farage’s purple peril. We’ve already had the Ribena test, and this week a City AM piece sought to disentangle ‘red Ukip’ from ‘blue Ukip’ – the Labour component of Nigel Farage’s appeal from the Tory one. The latter article, probably unsurprisingly, concluded that red Ukip was mainly a northern phenomenon and blue Ukip predominantly southern. South Thanet, the Kent seat where I’m standing against Nigel Farage, seems at […]

    Read more →
  • Comment I hate Labour’s immigration mug – but I hate their immigration pledge even more

    I hate Labour’s immigration mug – but I hate their immigration pledge even more

    Yesterday the Labour Party put a dent in the good week they’ve been having by putting on sale a mug stamped with Labour’s promise to put “controls on immigration”.  The was rightly criticised across Twitter; some said it was pandering to Ukip while others seemed to be in disbelief that the party would even produce a piece of merchandise. However, the mug is one of a family of five, each of which are branded with one of Labour’s election pledges. In response to […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Has there been a post-debate “Milibounce”? Signs are good, but lets not get carried away

    Has there been a post-debate “Milibounce”? Signs are good, but lets not get carried away

    Here’s a Sunday Times front page that Miliband and his team will be delighted with – a four point lead with YouGov and talk of momentum for Labour: But – it’s only one poll. That’s the best and most important place to start when talking about a post-debate bounce for Labour (or a “Milibounce” as it was inevitably labelled). The only poll that has been released so far with fieldwork produced post-debate is the YouGov poll in today’s Sunday Times – […]

    Read more →
  • News 40 days to go: Alexander kicks off Labour’s campaign

    40 days to go: Alexander kicks off Labour’s campaign

    Today Douglas Alexander, Labour’s Chair of General Election Strategy, will visit marginal seat Ealing Central and Acton to mark the fact that there are 40 campaigning days left until the general election. Alexander will also visit this constituency, which Labour’s candidate Rupa Huq hopes to win from Conservative Angie Bray, to send a message that Labour have 40 policies that would make Britain better (a list of which can be found below). This ties in with Labour’s campaign slogan “A […]

    Read more →
  • Comment It’s time for the Tories to come clean on their secret £12billion plan to hit children, carers, families and disabled people

    It’s time for the Tories to come clean on their secret £12billion plan to hit children, carers, families and disabled people

    David Cameron and Iain Duncan Smith have repeatedly refused to explain how they would make the £12 billion cuts in social security spending that their fiscal plans for the next parliament depend on. If anyone wondered why, now  we know. Leaked documents drawn up by civil servants for Conservative ministers and reportedly discussed with Conservative officials, confirm that this extreme cuts plan would hit disabled people and their carers hard. The Tories have denied this is their plan. But the truth is […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit