Why Labour should be making a One Nation case for Europe

19th January, 2013 2:32 pm

 

Yesterday we were supposed to have the big speech on Europe from David Cameron. It was originally scheduled for next week and then under pressure from business leaders and our partners in the EU, it was brought forward to today. And now – for understandable reasons – it’s been postponed.

This reflects the uncertainty and lack of leadership that has defined Conservative Party policy on our relationship with the EU. Will we have a referendum? Will a protracted campaign deter investment? What choice will a referendum offer us? Vince Cable this week says a referendum would be a dangerous sleepwalk to a “Brexit”. In short, it’s a euroshambles.

Thankfully, Labour has moved to spell out its approach to Europe. On Thursday, in a speech at Chatham House, Douglas Alexander has given a clear commitment that a Labour Government would represent the “national interest” in its dealings with the EU.

Mr Alexander said: “We have a Prime Minister who simply cannot reconcile he demands of his party with the needs of his country”. That won’t be the case for a Labour Government. That’s because Labour understands the realpolitik of both being in the EU and taking a leadership position – and the benefits that can bring the UK.

Ideological hostility to the EU is becoming more mainstream in the Conservative Party – so is opportunistic hostility – as a result of fears over a UKIP challenge at the next general election.

It’s something of a relief to hear that Douglas Alexander will not fall into the opportunistic trap. This for me is the measure of Douglas Alexander as a national politician. He could have trumped David Cameron today by calling for a referendum – albeit one that offers a real choice rather than the false choice that the Conservatives are likely to offer (either out or a membership where we are stripped of employment and environmental protections – and which in any case is unlikely to be accepted by our 26 EU partners ).

Labour seems more comfortable than it has been for a long time about its position on Europe. Just because David Cameron shys away from upsetting hardline Eurosceptics who are making all the noise at the moment, it doesn’t mean that Ed Miliband should too. As a One Nation party that sees the benefits of EU membership for our national interest, we have a responsibility for making the case.

For pro-Europeans in the Labour Party like me, Douglas Alexander’s speech is music to our ears. Not only is it unapologetically pro-European but it is also hard-headed about what it wants from the EU for hard-working families in he UK.

There are some eurofederalists in our party that think we should simply make a European case for our membership. This is wrong. We should make a One Nation case.

That’s why Douglas Alexander is right to say he wants to address people’s concerns over things like the Agency Workers Directive and the Posting of Workers Directive. David Cameron simply wants to dump any employment protection measures at the earliest possible opportunity. Make no mistake that’s what the Conservative policy on re-negotiation is all about.

Similarly, we need to take a One Nation approach to free movement of workers. Next year, restrictions on Bulgarians and Romanians working in the UK will be lifted. While there are already tough EU restrictions on welfare benefits for non-UK Europeans, the Labour Party’s policy review needs to take a close look at our labour market requirements and address the wider issue of free movement of workers accordingly.

This is the right way to approach the European Union. It is based on a hard-headed assessment of our national interests and our party’s values. As long as we take a One Nation approach we have nothing to fear from hard-line eurosceptics in UKIP or elsewhere.

Kevin Doran is a Member of the Future of Europe Forum 

  • NT86

    Maybe Labour would manage to claw back lost votes by actually promising a referendum. Labour voters are just as sick and tired of this expensive, inefficient gravy train as Tory voters and UKIP voters. There was a time before Blair’s leadership when Euroscepticism was seen as the norm in the party. What changed?

    • reformist lickspittle

      It was a bit before Blair, actually.

      One of the first things Kinnock did after becoming leader following the 1983 election disaster was to dump withdrawal from the EC/EU (not least because despite being supposedly “popular” in polls, it had actually proved a vote loser on the doorstep – maybe that is something still relevant to today??) And by the late 1980s Labour had become a basically pro-European party – not least because many had come to see Europe (with the Delors “social” progammes and so on) as something of a bulwark against Thatcherite free market, anti worker extremism.

      Promising a referendum is easy populism – but as the PM is now finding out, rather harder to put into practice…….

  • MonkeyBot5000

    Please stop trying to brand everything as One Nation as it really doesn’t mean anything. It just sounds like you’re trying to put a veneer of vague, inoffensive patriotism on something.

    We’re not consumers, we’re voters and we know the difference between a marketing pitch and a reasoned argument. If you want to make a case for Europe, tell us why you think it’s good for the British people and tell us what you will do to address the problems.

    I’d have no problem with fully integrated U.S. of Europe in principle, but only if it’s accountable to the people and the populaces of the countries involved vote for it. However, given the problems with the EAW and a budget that no-one seems to be able to tame or even explain with some signed off accounts, I’d prefer to stay out of the EU until I see some concrete action to tackle those problems.

  • JoeDM

    One Nation Europe.

    Sounds like a single federal state !!!

Latest

  • News Momentum leak: Six things we learned

    Momentum leak: Six things we learned

    The agenda of Saturday’s meeting of the Momentum National Committee has found its way into the public domain. Here are six things we learned from it. 1) Momentum has raised £33,000 but has set its sights on more than £150,000 The group has raised £33,441.56 since October, mainly from online donations. However, it hopes an official membership structure would raise £150,000 a year. This would be from an annual fee of £10 a year or £1 a month. Momentum hopes […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Momentum to block supporters of rival parties from membership

    Momentum to block supporters of rival parties from membership

    Momentum, the controversial Corbynite pressure group, has confirmed that supporters of rival political parties will not be able to sign up. Leaked documents reveal Momentum’s blueprint to raise funds, take on Labour’s “moderates” and set up formal alliance with constituency parties. It has also confirmed a code of ethics that includes an opposition to “illegal wars” and Trident renewal, showing a strong reaction against Labour policy of recent decades. However, John McTernan, a former adviser to Tony Blair, has hit back at […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Trade Union Action Week Unions Cameron underestimates the labour movement. We will fight on despite the Trade Union Bill

    Cameron underestimates the labour movement. We will fight on despite the Trade Union Bill

    Teaching assistants. Cleaners. Nurses. Care workers. Lollipop ladies. Hardly a list of the people our society should want to regulate. These are people who spend their time caring for us, serving us and saving lives. People who arrive at work before Conservative politicians wake up and who are still working long after Cameron and Osborne have gone back to Downing Street for the night. And yet these are just some of those who will be hit by the government’s latest […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Roosh V: the government’s hands-off approach reflects their weak effort to tackle gender violence

    Roosh V: the government’s hands-off approach reflects their weak effort to tackle gender violence

    This weekend Roosh V and his misogynist and vicious ‘Return of Kings’ groups were scheduled to meet across the UK as part of a so-called ‘world tour’. This is the man who suggested that rape on private property should be legalised. Let’s be clear from the outset. There is never, ever, under any circumstances, any justification for rape. It is a crime of the utmost seriousness, one which, despite a recent increase in the number of rapes reported, still too […]

    Read more →
  • News Former Head of the Civil Service criticises government plan to cut party funding

    Former Head of the Civil Service criticises government plan to cut party funding

    Lord Kerslake, former Head of the Civil Service (2012-2014), has criticised the Government’s plans to cut Short money and change trade union funding. Lord Kerslake is a crossbencher. Appearing on BBC Sunday Politics he said the Government’s plans signalled “a worryingly authoritarian streak in government” that finds it difficult to accept challenge. He said everyone, regardless of party affiliation, should be concerned about the changes. He voiced similar concerns at the start of the year. The Government are planning to […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit