Why Labour should be making a One Nation case for Europe

January 19, 2013 2:32 pm

 

Yesterday we were supposed to have the big speech on Europe from David Cameron. It was originally scheduled for next week and then under pressure from business leaders and our partners in the EU, it was brought forward to today. And now – for understandable reasons – it’s been postponed.

This reflects the uncertainty and lack of leadership that has defined Conservative Party policy on our relationship with the EU. Will we have a referendum? Will a protracted campaign deter investment? What choice will a referendum offer us? Vince Cable this week says a referendum would be a dangerous sleepwalk to a “Brexit”. In short, it’s a euroshambles.

Thankfully, Labour has moved to spell out its approach to Europe. On Thursday, in a speech at Chatham House, Douglas Alexander has given a clear commitment that a Labour Government would represent the “national interest” in its dealings with the EU.

Mr Alexander said: “We have a Prime Minister who simply cannot reconcile he demands of his party with the needs of his country”. That won’t be the case for a Labour Government. That’s because Labour understands the realpolitik of both being in the EU and taking a leadership position – and the benefits that can bring the UK.

Ideological hostility to the EU is becoming more mainstream in the Conservative Party – so is opportunistic hostility – as a result of fears over a UKIP challenge at the next general election.

It’s something of a relief to hear that Douglas Alexander will not fall into the opportunistic trap. This for me is the measure of Douglas Alexander as a national politician. He could have trumped David Cameron today by calling for a referendum – albeit one that offers a real choice rather than the false choice that the Conservatives are likely to offer (either out or a membership where we are stripped of employment and environmental protections – and which in any case is unlikely to be accepted by our 26 EU partners ).

Labour seems more comfortable than it has been for a long time about its position on Europe. Just because David Cameron shys away from upsetting hardline Eurosceptics who are making all the noise at the moment, it doesn’t mean that Ed Miliband should too. As a One Nation party that sees the benefits of EU membership for our national interest, we have a responsibility for making the case.

For pro-Europeans in the Labour Party like me, Douglas Alexander’s speech is music to our ears. Not only is it unapologetically pro-European but it is also hard-headed about what it wants from the EU for hard-working families in he UK.

There are some eurofederalists in our party that think we should simply make a European case for our membership. This is wrong. We should make a One Nation case.

That’s why Douglas Alexander is right to say he wants to address people’s concerns over things like the Agency Workers Directive and the Posting of Workers Directive. David Cameron simply wants to dump any employment protection measures at the earliest possible opportunity. Make no mistake that’s what the Conservative policy on re-negotiation is all about.

Similarly, we need to take a One Nation approach to free movement of workers. Next year, restrictions on Bulgarians and Romanians working in the UK will be lifted. While there are already tough EU restrictions on welfare benefits for non-UK Europeans, the Labour Party’s policy review needs to take a close look at our labour market requirements and address the wider issue of free movement of workers accordingly.

This is the right way to approach the European Union. It is based on a hard-headed assessment of our national interests and our party’s values. As long as we take a One Nation approach we have nothing to fear from hard-line eurosceptics in UKIP or elsewhere.

Kevin Doran is a Member of the Future of Europe Forum 

  • NT86

    Maybe Labour would manage to claw back lost votes by actually promising a referendum. Labour voters are just as sick and tired of this expensive, inefficient gravy train as Tory voters and UKIP voters. There was a time before Blair’s leadership when Euroscepticism was seen as the norm in the party. What changed?

    • reformist lickspittle

      It was a bit before Blair, actually.

      One of the first things Kinnock did after becoming leader following the 1983 election disaster was to dump withdrawal from the EC/EU (not least because despite being supposedly “popular” in polls, it had actually proved a vote loser on the doorstep – maybe that is something still relevant to today??) And by the late 1980s Labour had become a basically pro-European party – not least because many had come to see Europe (with the Delors “social” progammes and so on) as something of a bulwark against Thatcherite free market, anti worker extremism.

      Promising a referendum is easy populism – but as the PM is now finding out, rather harder to put into practice…….

  • MonkeyBot5000

    Please stop trying to brand everything as One Nation as it really doesn’t mean anything. It just sounds like you’re trying to put a veneer of vague, inoffensive patriotism on something.

    We’re not consumers, we’re voters and we know the difference between a marketing pitch and a reasoned argument. If you want to make a case for Europe, tell us why you think it’s good for the British people and tell us what you will do to address the problems.

    I’d have no problem with fully integrated U.S. of Europe in principle, but only if it’s accountable to the people and the populaces of the countries involved vote for it. However, given the problems with the EAW and a budget that no-one seems to be able to tame or even explain with some signed off accounts, I’d prefer to stay out of the EU until I see some concrete action to tackle those problems.

  • JoeDM

    One Nation Europe.

    Sounds like a single federal state !!!

Latest

  • Comment As the PPC in Iain Duncan Smith’s constituency, Ed has taught me two important lessons

    As the PPC in Iain Duncan Smith’s constituency, Ed has taught me two important lessons

    Ed Miliband has tackled the issue of his perceived image problem. Rather than embarrassingly excuse himself or convince the public he is something he is not, he has embraced his own persona, accepting it in order to extinguish the ongoing media analysis of who he is rather than what he stands for. This move shows courage, political prowess and most of all, it’s set the stage for next year’s election to be about policy rather than personalities. I cannot tell […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Cameron condemned for immigration PR stunt

    Cameron condemned for immigration PR stunt

    Yesterday, David Cameron offered an ominous threat to people who are deemed to be ‘illegal immigrants’, when he said “we will find you and make sure you are sent back to the country you came from.”  Who knew he meant this literally?  This announcement was worrying enough in itself – such a threat demonises immigrants and ignores the many reasons people might be in the UK illegally – but the PM decided to take his intimidating statement one step further. Cameron, […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Cameron dropped Gove, now Labour must drop his policies

    Cameron dropped Gove, now Labour must drop his policies

    Fireworks, champagne corks popping and rare mashups of Hallelujah and Ode to Joy were heard echoing down the corridors from staffrooms across England and Wales in response to the news that Michael Gove had at long last been sacked as Secretary of State for Education. Forget the unpopularity of his policies, his mishandling of the scandal over suspected attempts to indoctrinate Birmingham’s children to Islamic extremism or his inability to work with anyone from teachers to the Home Secretary – […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour outraised the Tories in 2013, but financial worries still remain

    Labour outraised the Tories in 2013, but financial worries still remain

    The Electoral Commission’s annual report of party finances has been published for 2013, and it turns out that Labour actually raised more money than the Conservatives last year – by almost £8 million. Labour raised £33.4m, while the Tories raised just £25.4m. As George Eaton points out, over at the New Statesman, much of Labour’s advantage comes from short money (the money opposition parties receive from the state). However, this only amounts to £6.9m, meaning Labour still raised roughly an […]

    Read more →
  • Comment We need a Mayor who offers London serious alternatives

    We need a Mayor who offers London serious alternatives

     Speaking at the launch of Labour’s summer campaign last week Ed Miliband said “We need a new leadership: Leadership that thinks deeply and offers creative, new ideas. Leadership that seeks to be faithful to principle, even when it’s hard to do. Leadership that listens and cares.” His eyes, of course, are set on the general election but he could have been talking about the London mayoral campaign. This time next year a very short primary season will be in full […]

    Read more →