Boris got his just desserts

March 25, 2013 2:18 pm

Boris Johnson’s nightmare interview on The Andrew Marr Show yesterday morning is the kind of encounter that changes perceptions about a politician. Not perhaps in the court of public opinion – Sunday morning political TV is the preserve of the political anorak community – but here, such things matter.

Yesterday was an unmitigated disaster for the London Mayor, pricking the hubris of his pretensions to the Tory throne by exposing the limits of his carefully crafted buffoonery which usually helps him dodge the kind of basic scrutiny every other politician takes as par for the course.

Yesterday is the first time I can recall an interviewer not prepared to play Boris’s game. Stand-in presenter Eddie Mair is a highly effective inquisitor who never raises his voice and rarely cuts in. His questions were direct and persistently put; dredging up the less salubrious parts of the Johnson tale.

Mair asked Boris why he had lied to Michael Howard about an affair, got sacked as a junior reporter for The Times for fabricating a quote and discussed with his friend Darius Guppy, how he could obtain the address of a journalist Guppy wanted to assault.

“You’re a nasty piece of work aren’t you?” Mair chided.

The mechanics of yesterday’s encounter were also important. Boris’s usual way of handling interviews is to speak across the interviewer, refusing to engage with the questions put to him. He tries humour at first, but when this doesn’t work he drifts off at inarticulate tangents or falls back on his bumbling esoteric rhetoric until the interviewer runs out of time.

It didn’t work yesterday because he was snared in a lengthy fifteen minute interview with nowhere to hide. He was left sounding weak, evasive and oddly for an intelligent man, pretty dumb.

The look of shock on his face was because Boris usually benefits from being part of a cosy London club of politicians and journalists who think it bad form to give one of their own gang a hard time. That’s why the John Humprhies and Jeremy Paxmans can always be relied upon to give him the kid gloves treatment in interviews.

Dan Hodges at the Telegraph wrote yesterday that Boris should have told Mair to mind his own business when quizzed about his affair. Perhaps he should have, but Boris didn’t because the claims have been unchallenged in the public domain for so long they don’t appear to bear refutation.

But was it unfair to throw these questions at Johnson? Not in the context of an in-depth biographical documentary set for broadcast tonight it wasn’t. Boris argued that the BBC had already commissioned the programme ‘Boris Johnson: The Irresistible Rise’, so thought it better to join in.

Most other politicians would have remained apart from the whole thing, sensing the inherent danger of a forensic investigation by the veteran political sleuth Michael Cockerell. However Boris needs attention – adulation preferably – in the same way a fish needs water.

Yesterday he found himself flapping around on the hook, only too keen to have gobbled the bait of an agenda-setting Sunday morning interview where he must have known he would be asked about the documentary’s contents.

Over in the Downing Street bunker it wasn’t the sound of flapping so much as slapping as Cameroons high-fived each other, glad to see this 220lb man-mountain of human ambition taken down a peg.

Tory MPs looking for a new saviour will now keep looking.

  • Amber_Star

    Mark, “…dredging up the more salubrious parts of the Johnson tale.” I think you meant to write less salubrious.

  • Amber_Star

    Mark, “…dredging up the more salubrious parts of the Johnson tale.” I think you meant to write less salubrious.

  • Amber_Star

    Having done my little bit of proof reading, I just want to add that the Boris interview was very amusing. Political anoraks we may be but if Boris actually achieved the Tory leadership, “You’re a Nasty Piece of Work, aren’t you?” would be all over the social media & YouTube. Unless he pulls a glittering rabbit out of his hat, Boris’s ambition to lead the Tory Party has been dealt a death blow by Eddie Mair.

    • http://twitter.com/renieanjeh Renie Anjeh

      They haven’t been dealt a blow. It is Boris, you’re talking about. This is the man who did nothing in his first term as Mayor, had two affairs, lied to his party leader, failed over his handling over the riots, lied to Conrad Black on standing for Parliament, insulted most of the country in one way or another and he is still standing, in fact rising. People will be laughing, Cameron and Theresa May will be rubbing their hands with joy right now but if he ever becomes PM with Adam Afriyie as his Chancellor, people most certainly will not be laughing.

  • Amber_Star

    Having done my little bit of proof reading, I just want to add that the Boris interview was very amusing. Political anoraks we may be but if Boris actually achieved the Tory leadership, “You’re a Nasty Piece of Work, aren’t you?” would be all over the social media & YouTube. Unless he pulls a glittering rabbit out of his hat, Boris’s ambition to lead the Tory Party has been dealt a death blow by Eddie Mair.

  • http://twitter.com/_DaveTalbot David Talbot

    Agree Kevin.

    It has been a very inverse reaction (from some) that the real scandal here is that Eddie Mair dared to ask these questions – and not that Boris had actually indulged in these various acts.

    “Yesterday is the first time I can recall an interviewer not prepared to play Boris’s game. ”

    Absolument.

  • http://twitter.com/renieanjeh Renie Anjeh

    This interview won’t change much for Boris’ leadership ambitions. His party still love him, he still has a strong team around him and he still is as ambitious as ever. It might be amusing now, but just imagine the 2020 General Election, Boris Johnson with his Shadow Chancellor Adam Afriyie – we might be laughing now, but people won’t be laughing then.

  • MonkeyBot5000

    You’ve got to love Eddie Mair. He’s such a contrast to Paxman that interviewees don’t realise that he’s skewered them until it’s too late.

  • Daniel Speight

    Dan Hodges at the Telegraph wrote yesterday that Boris should have told Mair to mind his own business when quizzed about his affair.

    Well Hodges would say that, wouldn’t he?

    Just a thought. Do you think Bozier and Hodges are still great mates? They would make a good team Johnson.

    • http://twitter.com/renieanjeh Renie Anjeh

      Well it was a good article from Dan Hodges and he is right to say that Boris should have said that. I would have.

Latest

  • News Blair says the West must be prepared to work with Putin and the Egyptian military

    Blair says the West must be prepared to work with Putin and the Egyptian military

    Tony Blair may not have been Prime Minister for nearly seven years now, but his views – particularly on foreign policy – are always newsworthy. This morning he gave a wide-ranging and controversial speech at Bloomberg’s London HQ on the Middle East, urging the West not to pull back from the Middle East as an unsolvable problem, but to engage. Although despite the billing, this was as much a speech about faith as it was about geo-politics. At the roots of Blair’s […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour set up rapid rebuttal unit for election campaign

    Labour set up rapid rebuttal unit for election campaign

    Labour plan to step up their media monitoring process in the run up to the 2015 general election, according to The Independent. A team will be in charge of rebutting negative media to avoid a re-run of the 1992 election, where an onslaught of attacks from the press played their part in a unexpected Conservative victory. Michael Dugher, the MP in charge of Labour’s communications, is this week in the US discussing strategy with new appointment David Axelrod and other political […]

    Read more →
  • Featured UKIP, England and St George

    UKIP, England and St George

    Labour tends to view UKIP like Nelson viewed the signal at the Battle of Copenhagen. He held the telescope to his blind eye and said, ‘I really do not see the signal’.  Our image of  UKIP is a protest vehicle for disaffected, older, right wing Tories in the South. But UKIP represents more significant trends than this caricature suggests. UKIP is a symptom of the deep social and economic changes that have taken place over the last thirty years. Its […]

    Read more →
  • News Why are the Lib Dems so shy?

    Why are the Lib Dems so shy?

    Regular readers will know that we’re always keeping an eye on Lib Dems leaflets. Their local propaganda sheets are always good for a questionable bar chart, or forgetting the name of the generic place their text is for – but they can also be quite shy about their party affiliation too. For example, take the “Islington Chronicle”. Sounds like a local paper, and there’s no Lib Dem logo and barely a splash of their trademark yellow. But it is, in […]

    Read more →
  • News Scotland Seats and Selections Have the Tories given up on Scotland?

    Have the Tories given up on Scotland?

    This morning we noted that the Tories haven’t selected candidates in nearly half of the most marginal Labour and Lib Dem seats. But what’s particularly telling is that in over 60% of target seats in the Midlands and the North they have so far failed to select a candidate, while the Independent claims that in Scotland there are no Tory parliamentary candidates at all. However, Mark Wallace over at ConHome notes that the Tories have in fact selected a total of two […]

    Read more →