Further education is the big loser in the spending review

27th June, 2013 11:00 am

George Osborne argued that the Spending Review would promote growth and fairness. Further and higher education are key to both of these objectives: educating people to a higher level opens up opportunity and equips our economy with the higher level skills we need to compete in what the Chancellor calls ‘the global race’.

The relative ‘winner’ in today’s settlement was science and research: as our recent IPPR report proposed, the science and research budget remains ring fenced and sustained in cash terms at £4.6 billion, while the science capital budget is maintained in real terms. These are important moves, although it should be noted that accounting for inflation the budget for science will have fallen by 9% in real terms by2015 and is likely to continue to fall until 2017/18.

Osborne proclaimed today that the measures taken in the last spending review had put higher education funding on a sustainable footing.  In 2010 the government cut teaching grants to universities and replaced them with higher tuition fees, reducing the teaching grant by 50 per cent between 2012/13 and 2014/15. Of course the government is still borrowing that money and paying it out in fee loans to undergraduates – but this borrowing is ‘off the books’ and does not count towards the deficit.

One consequence of this is that it takes a huge part of government funding for universities ‘off balance sheet’, meaning that when BIS is asked to make further cuts it has relatively limited room for manoeuvre. With the research budget protected that means Vince Cable has been left making cuts to student maintenance grants. These grants are supposed to help students meet the cost of living but they are being cut by £60 million in real terms in 2015/16. Moreover there is an unallocated £45 million cut to the Hefce budget, which is likely to mean cuts in ‘widening participation’ funding that is intended to improve access to those from disadvantaged backgrounds. These decisions will become even harder after the election: IPPR calculates that BIS can expect to see a further cut of 22% to its budget in the next parliament.

Contrary to what Osborne the student finance system is not actually financially sustainable. The government has consistently over estimated how much money it will get back from graduates once they have started to repay. Rather than the 30% of loans not being repaid the government first calculated, we calculate that as much as 40% of student loans will go unpaid. IPPR estimates that this could produce a £1 billion black hole in the department’s budget over time.

The government is right to abolish the National Scholarship Programme, which is spent on fee waivers and bursaries which have proven ineffective at improving access.  £50 million of this £150 million scheme is to be switched to support disadvantaged postgraduate students. This is welcome, but the government should go further and give postgraduates access to the same subsidized loans as undergraduates. The long term cost of this to the taxpayer is very low.

The big loser in today’s announcement is further education, whose funding will be reduced by a further £260 million in 2015/16. Overall further education is taking a bigger cut than higher education, despite its vital role in improving social mobility. Coming after previous cuts to the EMA and the scrapping of the Future Jobs Fund, this government has overseen a massive withdrawal of support for those young people in education and training who do not go to university.

Rick Muir is Associate Director at IPPR

Latest

  • Comment Europe Votes at 16 is a vital part of engaging young people in the EU referendum

    Votes at 16 is a vital part of engaging young people in the EU referendum

    On this day 87 years ago the Representation of the People (Equal Franchise) Act came into law. It allowed women to vote at 21, the same age as men. Looking back, the arguments against women voting seem bizarre. Yet many of the same arguments are currently being used against 16 and 17-year-olds being given the vote, with naysayers arguing that they are irresponsible, incapable of taking decisions, and even that young people should be kept ‘innocent’ of politics. These negative […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured The Prime Minister’s plan to tackle extremism only makes ISIS more potent

    The Prime Minister’s plan to tackle extremism only makes ISIS more potent

    Nothing highlights the sorry state of this government’s plan to combat ISIS and Islamic extremism more than David Cameron words this week. To defeat “this poisonous ideology,” he wrote: “We must strengthen our institutions that put our values into practice: our democracy, our rule of law, the rights of minorities, our free media, our law enforcements – all the things the terrorists hate.” But does anyone really believe Cameron is interested in strengthening our rule of law, rights of minorities […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured So you’ve been elected leader…

    So you’ve been elected leader…

    Last week, I laid out the potential paths to victory for the four candidates for Labour leader, setting out how it was possible for each candidate to win. Having internal elections like this – especially so soon after the gruelling General Election campaign – September 12th must feel like a finishing post for the candidates and their teams. But of course, the winning of the leadership is really just the start. How should each candidate approach running the Party? What is […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Leadership candidates set out devolution plans

    Leadership candidates set out devolution plans

    Labour leadership candidates will today flesh out their plans for devolution at a hustings in front of the Local Government Association Conference. Liz Kendall set out some of her vision, particularly with regards to fighting welfare reforms, earlier this week, and Burnham and Cooper are understood to be making clear their pitches later today. Andy Burnham Burnham will say the test of candidates in the Labour Leadership election is whether they can offer bold solutions to the challenges the country faces. […]

    Read more →
  • Comment We can be winning the economic arguments, right now

    We can be winning the economic arguments, right now

    Watching our earnest contenders debating exactly how many pro-business credentials they have to display to make Labour electable makes me almost nostalgic for May 2010. We seem to enjoy wallowing in the self-deprecating, self-pitying comfort zone of defeat, happy to leave the Tories to dismantle our public services (again), while we studiously beat ourselves up in public about Ed’s deficit blankout and Liam’s silly note. We’ve forgotten how on that fateful Thursday evening, no-one was more surprised with that exit […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit