Labour won’t support Juncker’s bid for President of the European Commission

9th June, 2014 3:49 pm

Amid rumours circulating today, Labour have confirmed this afternoon that they will not be supporting Jean-Claude Juncker’s bid for the presidency of the European Commission.

369px-Juncker_EPP_Summit_October_2010

In line with David Cameron’s opposition to Juncker’s bid, the party has said Mr Juncker will make EU reform “more difficult” and so Labour MEP’s will be voting against the ex-Prime Minister of Luxembourg if it comes to it.

Outlining the party’s position in a statement earlier today, a Labour spokesperson said:

“The nominee for European Commission President is ultimately a decision for the European Council, including David Cameron.

Labour will not support Jean-Claude Juncker as a candidate for President of the European Commission. Should Mr Juncker be put before the European Parliament, Labour MEPs would vote against him.

The message from the European elections was clear – that we need reform in Europe. We need reform so we can promote jobs and growth.

Mr Juncker’s record shows he would make these reforms more difficult.”

  • george

    if its not juncker … it will be some other federalist. may as well accept this one as he’s a bit more amenable to us opting out of some of the EU shackles.

  • R Fairless

    It has to be understood that the rest of the Commissioners and intended Commissioners are no different to Juncker; they all have the same beliefs and the same aims. It’s written into their DNA and the various treaties. All are committed to the European supra-national State with control increasingly exercised from the centre by the Commissioners. Come the 1st November 2014 Britain looses a huge chunk of its sovereignty as do all the other countries. So it matters not who is chosen. Cameron is expending a lot of hot air on something that makes no difference and the really sad thing is he knows it but his propaganda is for Home consumption.

  • robertcp

    Reform has become a meaningless word. I have no idea what the Labour spokesperson is on about!

  • Dan

    How shocking to see Labour agreeing with the Conservatives on something!

    ….said no-one ever.

  • Duncan Hall

    This shouldn’t be surprising – Junkers is the EPP candidate; the EPP is the biggest party in the European Parliament, so you would expect him to be successful despite facing significant opposition, especially from us and our European allies,
    The vague idea that had some traction in parts of Europe, however, was that the candidate of whichever party “won” the election would go forward, so you would therefore Junkers to be the successful candidate. This was intended to be some way of making the elections have some sort of tangible result. Hmm…

    • Doug Smith

      This is why Junkers should be President – he does at least have a veneer of democratic legitimacy.

      Labour is simply jumping on the anti-EU bandwagon.

  • Paul

    The SPD Spttizenkandidat Schulz has given his personal backing to a Juncker’s presidency on the basis of the long-agreed process – only now questioned by heads of state even though the SPD process was agreed in 2012, for example. I wonder if a decision to vote against the bulk of the SPD, if it comes to pass, will effectively mean that Labour leaves the SPD.

    This is all very short-sighted, especially when there’s a mechanism for the parliament to sack Juncker and his commissioners if they lose the confidence of MEPs over time.

  • Pingback: Labour’s change of position on the Juncker presidency | Though Cowards Flinch()

Latest

  • Comment We can be winning the economic arguments, right now

    We can be winning the economic arguments, right now

    Watching our earnest contenders debating exactly how many pro-business credentials they have to display to make Labour electable makes me almost nostalgic for May 2010. We seem to enjoy wallowing in the self-deprecating, self-pitying comfort zone of defeat, happy to leave the Tories to dismantle our public services (again), while we studiously beat ourselves up in public about Ed’s deficit blankout and Liam’s silly note. We’ve forgotten how on that fateful Thursday evening, no-one was more surprised with that exit […]

    Read more →
  • Comment PMQs Verdict: Harman’s hardened Heathrow stance will pay dividends for Labour down the line

    PMQs Verdict: Harman’s hardened Heathrow stance will pay dividends for Labour down the line

    Harriet Harman’s impressive PMQs form continues unabated. Post-election David Cameron may be in too strong a position to really struggle at the weekly bouts, but where previous Labour leaders would have wilted, Harman comes away with what, on balance, we can probably call a victory. She used her first questions to talk about the terrorists attack in Tunisia last week, and ask the PM about what steps the Government is taking to help victims and their families. As always, there […]

    Read more →
  • News Video Dennis Skinner: “No wonder they call him Dodgy Dave”

    Dennis Skinner: “No wonder they call him Dodgy Dave”

    Today Dennis Skinner took to the Commons floor to ask David Cameron a question about miners’ pensions. He said to that Cameron hasn’t “got the guts to help miners”, arguing “no wonder they call him Dodgy Dave”. Skinner was interrupted by Cameron who made this ageist comment, calling the MP for Bolsover “Jurrasic Park.” This isn’t the first time the PM has directed such a remark at Skinner; in 2012 he had to apologise after calling the Bolsover MP a “dinosaur”. You […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Labour back Heathrow expansion but the party are divided over the issue

    Labour back Heathrow expansion but the party are divided over the issue

    Labour today confirmed they will back Heathrow expansion – but the party are not completely united on the issue. Today the Airports Commission, also known as the Davies Commission, has recommended that a third runway should be built at Heathrow. It was thought the Commission might leave room for expansion to take place at Gatwick. However after three years of investigation, the Commission has concluded that it is “clear and unanimous” that Heathrow is the best place for a new […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Labour call for “annual equal pay checks” to see which companies are paying women less than men

    Labour call for “annual equal pay checks” to see which companies are paying women less than men

    Labour have called for an annual equal pay check to see which British companies are paying women less than men. Tomorrow in an opposition day debate Gloria de Piero, the shadow equalities minister, will say that there needs to be an “annual equal pay check”. She will say that this should be carried out by the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC). As of next year, companies that employ more than 250 have to publish figures showing the pay gap […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit