Labour won’t support Juncker’s bid for President of the European Commission

June 9, 2014 3:49 pm

Amid rumours circulating today, Labour have confirmed this afternoon that they will not be supporting Jean-Claude Juncker’s bid for the presidency of the European Commission.

369px-Juncker_EPP_Summit_October_2010

In line with David Cameron’s opposition to Juncker’s bid, the party has said Mr Juncker will make EU reform “more difficult” and so Labour MEP’s will be voting against the ex-Prime Minister of Luxembourg if it comes to it.

Outlining the party’s position in a statement earlier today, a Labour spokesperson said:

“The nominee for European Commission President is ultimately a decision for the European Council, including David Cameron.

Labour will not support Jean-Claude Juncker as a candidate for President of the European Commission. Should Mr Juncker be put before the European Parliament, Labour MEPs would vote against him.

The message from the European elections was clear – that we need reform in Europe. We need reform so we can promote jobs and growth.

Mr Juncker’s record shows he would make these reforms more difficult.”

  • george

    if its not juncker … it will be some other federalist. may as well accept this one as he’s a bit more amenable to us opting out of some of the EU shackles.

  • R Fairless

    It has to be understood that the rest of the Commissioners and intended Commissioners are no different to Juncker; they all have the same beliefs and the same aims. It’s written into their DNA and the various treaties. All are committed to the European supra-national State with control increasingly exercised from the centre by the Commissioners. Come the 1st November 2014 Britain looses a huge chunk of its sovereignty as do all the other countries. So it matters not who is chosen. Cameron is expending a lot of hot air on something that makes no difference and the really sad thing is he knows it but his propaganda is for Home consumption.

  • robertcp

    Reform has become a meaningless word. I have no idea what the Labour spokesperson is on about!

  • Dan

    How shocking to see Labour agreeing with the Conservatives on something!

    ….said no-one ever.

  • Duncan Hall

    This shouldn’t be surprising – Junkers is the EPP candidate; the EPP is the biggest party in the European Parliament, so you would expect him to be successful despite facing significant opposition, especially from us and our European allies,
    The vague idea that had some traction in parts of Europe, however, was that the candidate of whichever party “won” the election would go forward, so you would therefore Junkers to be the successful candidate. This was intended to be some way of making the elections have some sort of tangible result. Hmm…

    • Doug Smith

      This is why Junkers should be President – he does at least have a veneer of democratic legitimacy.

      Labour is simply jumping on the anti-EU bandwagon.

  • Paul

    The SPD Spttizenkandidat Schulz has given his personal backing to a Juncker’s presidency on the basis of the long-agreed process – only now questioned by heads of state even though the SPD process was agreed in 2012, for example. I wonder if a decision to vote against the bulk of the SPD, if it comes to pass, will effectively mean that Labour leaves the SPD.

    This is all very short-sighted, especially when there’s a mechanism for the parliament to sack Juncker and his commissioners if they lose the confidence of MEPs over time.

  • Pingback: Labour’s change of position on the Juncker presidency | Though Cowards Flinch

Latest

  • News Woolf and May should “meet survivors groups” over Brittan links, say Labour

    Woolf and May should “meet survivors groups” over Brittan links, say Labour

    Labour have spoken out about complaints that Fiona Woolf QC, head of the public inquiry into historical sex abuse, has links with Leon Brittan. Brittan was the home secretary at the time when the dossier about alleged pedophiles went missing. And Woolf, who is also Lord Mayor of London, admitted yesterday that since 2008 she had dinner with Brittan and his family on five separate occasions but she has said she has “no close association” with him. A number of Labour MPs […]

    Read more →
  • Comment PMQs review: Miliband lands punch on NHS as leaders go through the motions

    PMQs review: Miliband lands punch on NHS as leaders go through the motions

    Here we are again. Another week, another Wednesday, and another wrangle between Cameron and Miliband about the NHS. This is getting a bit old. Cameron attempted to get Miliband on the back foot – he kicked off PMQs by posing questions to the Labour leader about the Welsh NHS. Rather predictably, the rest of PMQs descended into the two party leaders arguing about who can be more trusted with the NHS. But, there was something a little more sinister about […]

    Read more →
  • Comment There is no such thing as a safe seat any more

    There is no such thing as a safe seat any more

    A couple of weeks ago saw the UK elect for the first time a UKIP MP – Douglas Carswell, with a huge majority of 12,000 votes. UKIP made enormous strides in the safe Labour seat of Heywood & Middleton as well, reducing the Labour majority from 5,971 to 617. This rise in the ‘acceptable’ far right should be a cause of concern not just to the Tories but also to us. It is clear from these results there is no […]

    Read more →
  • Comment We must tackle Ukip’s emotional appeal

    We must tackle Ukip’s emotional appeal

    The result in Heywood and Middleton may have shocked some people, but not all. Some warned this could happen after UKIP took or seriously challenged safe council seats in the north, topped the national vote at the Euros, and polled strongly in Labour areas. Their highest average share of the vote in the 2014 elections came in Labour areas like Rotherham, Mansfield and Hartlepool. We’re told if we campaign on the “issues” people will come back to Labour. This fails […]

    Read more →
  • Featured Young Labour voted against supporting the free education demo, but the debate on tuition fees has been reopened

    Young Labour voted against supporting the free education demo, but the debate on tuition fees has been reopened

    Last night Young Labour voted on whether or not to come out in support of the free education demonstration set to take place on the 19th November. Reports suggest, they voted against the motion. This result could easily be interpreted as another sign that the argument against tuition fees is dead in the water. In reality, it tells us that opposite is true. The very fact that this was a topic for discussion at Young Labour’s national committee, that there […]

    Read more →
7ads6x98y