Labour MPs have condemned the “appalling” decision by Amber Rudd to rule out an inquiry into the events at Orgreave more than 30 years ago.
MPs including Hilary Benn, Dan Jarvis and Sarah Champion spoke out after Rudd, the Home Secretary, surprised many by saying there was not a “sufficient basis” for a new probe despite huge public anger over the conduct of South Yorkshire police in the 1980s.
Campaigners, who met Rudd last month, had hoped she would order a new inquiry into the violence used by police against striking miners in 1984, in what was dubbed the “Battle of Orgreave”. It was followed allegations of police misconduct and a resulting cover-up which have persisted ever since.
Ministers had been expected to launch an inquiry into the way the police handled the situation, following an independent inquiry that finally reached “justice” for victims of the Hillsborough tragedy earlier this year. But Rudd this afternoon ruled out another inquiry into the same police force that had been found guilty of “gross negligence” at the football stadium disaster.
Shadow home secretary Diane Abbott slammed today’s decision as a “grave injustice”, while Andy Burnham, a prominent campaigner for the 96 victims of Hillsborough and their families, lambasted the announcement as an “establishment stitch-up”.
Gill Furniss, Labour’s shadow minister for the steel industry, said that she was “shocked” by the decision, but pledged: “The fight for #orgreavejustice will go on.”
There has been immediate and widespread condemnation from Labour MPs, with Sheffield MP Louise Haigh saying that Rudd’s decision is “absolutely appalling”. Her sentiments have been echoed by fellow Yorkshire MPs such as Benn, Jarvis and Champion, who said that she was “spitting feathers” over the announcement.
Labour had been pushing for an inquiry to take place, with Abbott saying this morning that the “demands for a proper inquiry are fully justified”.
In a statement this afternoon, Rudd said: “This has been a difficult decision to make, and one which I have thought about very carefully. I have now concluded that there is not a sufficient basis for me to instigate either a statutory inquiry or an independent review.
“The campaigners say that had the consequences of the events at Orgreave been addressed properly at the time, the tragic events at Hillsborough would never have happened five years later. That is not a conclusion which I believe can be reached with any certainty,” she added.
Absolutely appalling that there will be no inquiry into #Orgreave. Gvt has led campaigners up the garden path to deny justice at the 11th hr
— Louise Haigh (@LouHaigh) October 31, 2016
This is shameful. It's time the truth was told and the Government is failing in its responsibility by ruling out an Inquiry. https://t.co/R53ULXQjQ1
— Hilary Benn (@hilarybennmp) October 31, 2016
Given the substantial concerns that exist, it is astonishing that the Home Secretary will not commit to an inquiry or review into #Orgreave.
— Dan Jarvis (@DanJarvisMP) October 31, 2016
I'm spitting feathers @AmberRudd_MP refused an inquiry into #Orgreave South York needs the truth out there to move forward @orgreavejustice
— Sarah Champion (@SarahChampionMP) October 31, 2016
V disappointed to see gov rule out an Orgreave inquiry, absolute disgrace. We'll keep fighting for #OrgreaveJustice https://t.co/8Lt7KrjbEp
— Stephen Kinnock (@SKinnock) October 31, 2016
More from LabourList
Kemi Badenoch: Keir Starmer says first Black Westminster leader is ‘proud moment’ for Britain
‘Soaring attacks on staff show a broken prison system. Labour needs a strategy’
West of England mayor: The three aspiring Labour candidates shortlisted