Bonfire night for London Transport – and the Mayor’s fanning the flames

April 1, 2009 9:25 am

By Len DuvalFire

The Mayor’s bonfire of essential transport projects continued apace this week as he announced that Greenwich’s ‘Waterfront Transit’ (GWT) scheme will be axed. Southeast London has again been let down by a Mayor who, worryingly, has casually abandoned yet another scheme that would have been of immense benefit to Londoners and with it £40 million of investment.

While there were some issues surrounding the routing of the scheme through the Royal Arsenal, which I had been liaising with TfL and the residents’ association on, it was supported by local residents and endorsed by the London Development Agency, Friends of the Earth, Thames Gateway Partnership and the London Borough of Bexley.

The Mayor claims that the decision to scrap the project was taken “following consultation with local residents”. But since these consultations took place in 2005 and 2007 and highlighted no major concerns, it is risible that they are now being used to justify the Mayor’s decision.

He also justifies cancelling the scheme because of the his earlier decision to jettison the Thames Gateway Bridge (and with it £350m of PFI credits). This begs the question: why was the scheme not cancelled at the same time as the Bridge in TfL’s recent 10 year Business Plan? Not only did TfL choose not to do this but, in the very same document, they admit that the GWT offered “improved transport links to support major development proposals in south and east London” and would “improve connections for the 2012 Games events in the Greenwich area”. Moreover, there is no mention whatsoever of the scheme’s viability being linked to the existence of the Bridge.

When you combine the lost PFI credits from the scrapped Thames Gateway Bridge and the funds that would have been invested in the Transit scheme, southeast London, and Greenwich in particular, has lost out on almost £400million of funding within a year of Boris Johnson’s election. This would be easier to stomach if his decisions stood up to minimal scrutiny, but the reality is, today’s announcement reveals Boris Johnson’s approach to transport policy: arbitrary, inequitable and lacking in strategic vision.

Despite the challenging economic climate, the Mayor needs to understand that capital investment in London’s transport network is part of the solution to the city’s economic revival and long-term competitiveness, not a barrier to it. Based on the number of projects he has scrapped, it could be a long time before the penny drops.

Related posts:

  1. The government’s case for Heathrow – building Britain’s transport infrastructure
  2. Progressive London conference: live blog
  3. Cameron speaks! Read Dave on Sky last night and make your own mind up – Leader or Lightweight?
  4. Boris unclassified

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment The Labour Party was near the edge – are we back from the brink?

    The Labour Party was near the edge – are we back from the brink?

    Let’s be honest, every now and again you’ve taken a peek over the edge….the edge of the Labour party’s collapse.  And as the cliff edge has got steadily got closer, peeking has become like that itch you just can’t leave alone. If you can summon up the nerve to teeter on the edge and stare down the cliff face,  the scars of the Blair-Brown era emerge: declining membership; an exiting of talent; an experience for those who’ve stayed that remains [...]

    Read more →
  • News Ed (re)defines the squeezed middle

    Ed (re)defines the squeezed middle

    In a wide-ranging speech last night in Sheffield, Ed Miliband sought to explain what he means by the squeezed middle – and what he should have said when he was questioned about it months ago: “When John Humphrys asked me what I meant by the squeezed middle, I should have said this: The squeezed middle are working people. People bound together, now as in the past, by a set of values. The value of working hard. Whether it is in [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Prezza for Police Commissioner?

    Prezza for Police Commissioner?

    According to the Hull and East Riding Mail: “Lord Prescott said: “I want the opportunity to continue my public service to the region with a mandate from the people to protect the community and target criminals. “I feel that after proudly serving as a local MP for 40 years and as a cabinet minister for 10 years, I have the experience to listen to the public and help be their strong voice in supporting the police and holding them to [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured A big moment for the NHS – and for blogging

    A big moment for the NHS – and for blogging

    Today marks a big moment – not just in British blogging history, but in British political history. The decision by cabinet ministers to go to ConHome calling for the health bill to be dropped is a breach of collective responsibility, that much is clear. That they have briefed ConHome anonymously makes very little difference – Tim Montgomerie is a scrupulous character who can be taken at his word. These cabinet ministers, whoever they are, are angry. And they want this [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Is there a thin blue line for the new Police and Crime Commissioners?

    Is there a thin blue line for the new Police and Crime Commissioners?

    The process to select candidates for the new Police Crime Commissioners is underway. The Labour Party NEC will be long-listing at the end of February. The Liberal Democrats have, I understand, said that they do not intend to field candidates from a nationally organised position but will offer support to local parties taking the initiative. In the past, the Conservatives have declared that they will be hosting open primaries but no news is yet emerging on when and where these [...]

    Read more →