A new majority in the European Parliament?

May 20, 2009 9:07 am

European ParliamentBy Poul Nyrup Rasmussen

A new majority in the European Parliament after the European elections is possible – and necessary.

The situation in 2009 is quite different from 2004, and there are many reasons for change:

One, the new Parliament will have a much more decisive role in the top post in the EU: the President of the Commission. It is true the Parliament won’t nominate, but it will accept or reject. And many are in the mood to reject Barroso. I have already made it clear that the PES does not support him. It is the most important post that the Parliament will determine – much more so than the largely diplomatic role of Parliament President.

Two, the crisis – and the political response to the crisis – has created a much wider and deeper gulf between progressives and conservatives. Our answer to the crisis is very different from the lack of action from the conservatives.

Three, we simply need a new leadership and better management of the crisis. We need someone who can deliver a serious response to the crisis – with a new employment policy and a strategic plan of investments in green growth. We need a clear line for Europe which can unite member states to act in common.

In this case, one, two and three add up to much more than six. The majority in the Parliament will determine the President of the Commission when the incumbent, the candidate of the European conservatives’ party, has been found lacking on the biggest issue for many years to so seriously divide conservatives from progressives. In 2004 Barroso was a compromise candidate, in 2009 he is a compromised candidate.

For all these reasons the issue of a new majority is firmly on the table.

It is too early to discuss the possible composition of a new majority, or new majorities. The voters must have their say first – we need to see how the numbers stack up after the elections. We also need to see who leaves the conservative group along with the British and Czech conservatives, and if others in addition to the Italian Democrats come into our tent.

It is also an issue that needs to be discussed in more detail by the PES and our MEPs.

It’s not just me that thinks a new majority is possible. Why else would the conservative President of the Parliament want to put the new Commission President to the vote as early as July? Despite their repeated – and arrogant – claims that they will remain the largest group in the Parliament, the European conservatives are all too aware that even if they were the largest group (and that’s far from certain) – it does not guarantee them the majority they need.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why Labour is fighting for the legalisation of Humanist marriages today

    Why Labour is fighting for the legalisation of Humanist marriages today

    Monday saw the first day of Committee on the Same Sex Marriage Bill, where it became clear after a three hour debate on how to distinguish Same Sex Marriage from so called “traditional” marriage that opposition to this bill has not gone away. Despite a huge defeat on Second Reading, opponents reheated and repeated their earlier speeches, in part because their arguments rely on belief and prejudice not evidence or fact. So we sat until 11pm debating conscience clauses, Registrars [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Sometimes what is unsaid at PMQs is the most important thing of all…

    Sometimes what is unsaid at PMQs is the most important thing of all…

    Well that was a bad PMQs for Ed Miliband – the second in a row. Perhaps he hasn’t gotten back into his stride after such a long period without the weekly Wednesday joust, but whatever it is, Miliband isn’t hitting his marks at PMQs. Meanwhile Cameron – who has been jousting with world leaders this week – seemed far more o top of his game than we’ve been used to seeing him lately. Alas the problem for Miliband was that [...]

    Read more →
  • Video Cameron refuses to answer question on secret government plans to hike interest on student loans

    Cameron refuses to answer question on secret government plans to hike interest on student loans

    Last week it was revealed that the government discussed secret plans to hike interest on pre-existing student loans, meaning that anyone with a student loan will be expected to pay far more than expected. Today, the Prime Minister was asked about this – he spoke for nearly a minute but wouldn’t answer the question. What does he have to hide? How much more does he expect graduates to pay?

    Read more →
  • Comment Who benefits? Delivering on energy and infrastructure

    Who benefits? Delivering on energy and infrastructure

    Across the industrial north, it is striking how old pit villages and industrial towns are proving far less willing to embrace renewable energy than the noisier, more polluting fossil fuels and industries which shaped their identity. Energy companies are getting a nasty shock after mistakenly believing that these communities would not bat an eyelid at a few wind turbines on the surrounding hills because they had been content to make huge slag heaps part of the landscape in decades past. [...]

    Read more →
  • News Put reckless bankers in jail – Media roundup: June 19th, 2013

    Put reckless bankers in jail – Media roundup: June 19th, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this (and much more) in your inbox. You can sign up here. Put reckless bankers in jail Britain’s banking bosses should face jail if their decisions force fresh bailouts, the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards says today. The commission’s hotly anticipated report urges the Chancellor, George Osborne, to oversee the [...]

    Read more →