Proposal #3: Increase the Minimum Wage to a Living Wage

September 16, 2009 4:58 pm

CashBy Michael Green

A minimum wage of £7.45 per hour, coupled with modest corporation tax cut for small and medium size businesses is economically viable in the UK. It would lift millions of adults out of poverty, and children too.

The current minimum wage of £5.73 per hour is not enough to live on for one person, and falls below the poverty level of pay according to many studies and the general public.

Luxembourg has a minimum wage of €9.08 per hour which is £8.26 per hour at the current exchange rate. France has a minimum wage of €8.71 per hour (£7.92 per hour) and Ireland has a minimum wage of €8.65 per hour (£7.87 per hour). So a minimum wage of £7.45 per hour is hardly radical.

The trade union Unison recommends a minimum wage of £7.45 per hour by 2010. Labour could promise to bring this in before the end of its 4th term, once the economy has been back on track for several years.

18% of British children lived in workless households in early 2008. One of the major reasons for this is because work still doesn’t pay. The basic rate of income tax threshold should be pushed up to £10,000 (see later New Ideas contribution) and the minimum wage should be raised to £7.45.

Somebody has to do the low paying unskilled service sector jobs, so offering parents education alone isn’t good enough to end child poverty and create a society where everyone is of equal worth, knowledge worker or unskilled service worker. A living wage would reduce the number of workless households and reduce the need to spend on the working tax credit and jobseekers allowance; in the long term it would save billions of pounds.

In recent years, low income groups have seen their wages fall in real terms, while the middle income earners have had wage stagnation. As the ratio between supply and demand for low skilled labour increases due to knowledge economy expansion, unskilled workers will see their wages fall even further. So government must take action to prevent their wages from falling to an unacceptable level.

For all the fantastic new education opportunities for adults, too many are on far too low pay and often voting for political extremist parties as a result – this will get worse unless the minimum wage is raised to a living wage.

A living wage would benefit the economy because it would increase the amount of disposable income for the poorest. Most of the extra money available as a result of a living wage go back into the economy, and particularly benefit local Small and Medium Enterprises. Some of the lost government revenue from the SME corporation tax cuts would be made back through increased consumer spending by those on the living wage.

Scrapping pension relief for high earners could also bring back some of the lost government revenue. It would provide some more bottom-up stimulus that we need in the economy both today and in the future.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →