Ed Miliband explains the government’s position on 10:10 – if only everyone in cabinet could be this clear and direct

October 22, 2009 11:54 am

1010By Alex Smith / @alexsmith1982

Last night, only a small handful of Labour MPs voted in favour of the government signing up to reducing its greenhouse gas emissions from public buildings by 10% in 2010.

The Opposition Day Motion, submitted by the Lib Dems, called on government buildings to adhere to the 10:10 proposals – as 51 councis, 850 schools, 1,200 businesses and 35,000 individuals have already done. It was defeated by 297 to 226 after the government whip was applied.

On first glimpse, this seems like an incredibly regressive step, and the media reports have subsequently painted the vote in a negative light.

I, too, was initially confused by the vote, so contacted Ed Miliband, the climate change secretary, who has explained the government’s position in more detail:

Ed tells me:

“10:10 is a campaign which Labour supports: all Cabinet ministers have signed up to try to reduce their CO2 emissions by 10% in 2010. It’s a great motivator of public action to cut carbon emissions through individual and collective behaviour change and I hope it helps to build public support for action by governments to agree an ambitious, effective and fair deal at Copenhagen.

It’s also true that signing up can be an important step to sustaining long term emissions cuts. That’s why Labour-run councils and Labour groups are signing up to 10:10; we want local authorities to have local carbon budgets, and signing up to 10:10 is an important step towards that goal.

But as a government we have a much bigger, long term goal that we set out in the framework of Climate Change Act last year. Five months ago we put flesh on that framework when we agreed – with the support of the Lib Dems and the official Opposition – the first three carbon budgets for this country. Those budgets are 3 five year cycles moving from last year to 2022.

So every government department is committed to a long term reduction in carbon emissions – not just in 2009, not just in 2010, but through to 2022 and beyond. The public sector has already reduced its emissions by a third between 1990 and 2007 and the Government is on track to meet and exceed its carbon emissions target of 12.5% reductions from across its estate by 2010-11.

Se’re now allocating £20 million pounds to cut CO2 emissions from both the government estate and its transport to achieve those goals.”

If only the rest of the cabinet could explain the government position as quickly and clearly as Mr Miliband, we might get some good press occasionally.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →