In Swindon, the Tories have the audacity to question Labour’s education priorities – but then get their own numbers wrong!

November 12, 2009 1:14 pm

By Matthew Rhodes

Like many Councils across the country, Swindon Borough Council is now controlled by a monopoly of Tories. Since they took control in 2003 the people of Swindon have seen a Park and Ride site close, a Women’s Refuge shut down, local libraries closed and funding to a number of community groups slashed.

So when it comes to Tory motions at Full Council you would expect them to focus on what the administration is doing to improve services and make Swindon a better place. Not in Swindon. In Swindon we have an administration that indulges in political point scoring and attacking the town’s two Labour MPs, Anne Snelgrove MP and Michael Wills MP. Forget the fact that they don’t have the decency to speak with the MPs face-to-face for a second; surely this is missing the point of the Council’s responsibilities.

This week is no different. Two Tory backbenchers have tabled a motion regarding per pupil funding in Swindon, claiming that children in Swindon are funded significantly worse than others in England.

Firstly, there is the sheer audacity of the Tories in complaining about education funding when in 1997 per pupil funding in Swindon stood at £2,960 compared with today’s figure of £3,913, rising to £4,079 next year.

Secondly, they can’t even get the figures right! The motion reads:

“This council further notes with regret that under a Labour Government Swindon receives among the lowest funding per pupil for education in the country, the 17th lowest funding per pupil for education in England, only £3,913 guaranteed funding per pupil against an average of £5,410 last year in England, with some London Boroughs in excess of £6,000 per pupil.”

Well, the figure they quote as an England average is actually the figure for the average in the UK. This includes Scotland and Wales, which the Westminster Government has no control over. The actual figure for the average per pupil funding in England in 2009 is £4,218, a lot closer to Swindon’s figure.

Swindon’s grant has also increased by 13.4% since 2007 which is the 31st highest increase out of 149 local authorities. The grant is worked out based on the deprivation in an area and population density, Swindon suffers with pockets of deprivation and it is ludicrous to compare it with London Boroughs like Tower Hamlets and Hackney that rightly receive higher funding.

Swindon Labour Group’s Education spokesperson, Councillor Fay Howard, sums it up well:

“This motion could make it more difficult for Swindon to get funding. It is potentially damaging and based on flawed figures.”

What really sticks in the throat about this is that on the one hand we have a Labour Government that has built 18 new schools in Swindon since 1997, refurbished many more and will have increased funding by over £1,000 per pupil by next year, while on the other hand we have the Tories who reveal with mouth-watering glee that they will slash 10% from the education budget, close two Sure Start Centres in Swindon and the two Tory candidates in Swindon are opposed to building a University.

Our children’s education is only safe in Labour’s hands, if for no better reason than the Tories can’t even count!

Related posts:

  1. Numbers and Perspective on Expenses
  2. Wise spending on the education budget? Faith schools must be phased out
  3. Education, education, education…?
  4. Outside school activities can help break the link between poverty and education
  5. QE or not QE, that is the question

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Europe Ed Miliband should campaign for François Hollande

    Ed Miliband should campaign for François Hollande

    The Presidential election in France to be held on 22 April with a further round on 5 May, if necessary, matters hugely to the rest of Europe. Were Francois Hollande to win, there would be one significant voice at the top table in Europe opposed to the current centre-right imposition of continent-wide austerity as the sole solution to the economic crisis. France would provide an alternative policy, and a humane one to boot, which is lacking at present. Chancellor Merkel [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Cameron’s cleaner plan leaves out the 99%

    Cameron’s cleaner plan leaves out the 99%

    Poor Dave. Everything’s going wrong and he just doesn’t have a clue what to do, does he? He’s sitting on an economic mess that is getting worse by the day. None of the plans seem to be quite working as they’d hoped. Incredibly, Gideon’s made-up economic model “Expansionary Fiscal Contraction” (We’ll call it “Cutting for Growth” shall we?) isn’t working out so well. Unemployment is rising! Inflation is still high! Growth is shrinking faster than Michael Gove’s grip on reality! [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured Lansley and me…

    Lansley and me…

    There’s been quite a lot of Andrew Lansley in the press lately – mostly because he’s been making a terrible mess of NHS “reform”. It seems that no-one else can think of anything good to say about his reforms, especially the Prime Minister whose best riposte so far has been something along the lines of “Errrm, there’s a doctor in Doncaster who likes them…so there.” Enlightening, I’m sure. Now he’s been given the magical vote of confidence from Cameron – [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Elected City Mayors are an opportunity for Labour – if the party takes a positive approach

    Elected City Mayors are an opportunity for Labour – if the party takes a positive approach

    Labour run Liverpool Council voted this week to go straight to the election in May for a directly elected mayor, bypassing the referendum. This is significant. Not only does this open up the opportunity for Labour to gain more powers in the City, but it also sets the tone for other cities facing referendums in May. At present, Labour currently has four directly elected mayors; Hackney, Lewisham, Newham and Leicester. But many would argue that there should be more. Labour [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Scotland Why the Left should beware Salmond-onomics

    Why the Left should beware Salmond-onomics

    Following statements in both Westminster and Holyrood on the forthcoming referendum on separation, the debate on Scotland’s economic future has now been fully engaged. At stake in the referendum will be the nature of the new Scotland – either a low corporate tax, more oil and gas dependent economy on the SNP’s model, or a Scotland prepared to join the new agenda being advanced by the European left on reducing income inequality, and securing long-term investment in manufacturing and other [...]

    Read more →