Labour must seize the charities agenda

February 4, 2010 9:09 am

Jigsaw CommunityBy James Valentine

The Tories talk a lot about charities. When Cameron does photo-ops you’ll often see him with charity workers. And their agenda is clear. The state is seen as being too impersonal, bureaucratic, and even repressive. Public services aren’t a universal entitlement but should shrink to provide a safety net for the poor. More than that, the Tories imply that the state is actually opposed to charity – exemplified by Cameron’s grotesque statement that “Human kindness, generosity and imagination are steadily being squeezed out by the work of the state.”

In fact, charity turnover has doubled under Labour. As the Government has spent more on public services, so it has commissioned charities to carry out aspects of these services in flexible and innovative ways. And rather than “squeezing out” kindness, Labour’s period in office has seen people giving ever more to charity. As well as giving money, people are generous with their time; volunteering is more popular than ever and increasing numbers of citizens serve as charity trustees.

Mutuals and co-ops are part of the third sector family and it’s great that Gordon is now recognising the contribution that mutualism could make for Labour’s message.

The Co-operative Party‘s manifesto is already written and serves as an exemplar for Labour. Friendly societies and the co-operative movement are intrinsic to Labour’s structure and history and we should all celebrate this.

But there’s more to do. Over the weekend I met the Labour-supporting representative of an influential group of charities who spoke of being “love-bombed” by Tory shadow cabinet members – they’re always available to meet with charities and listen to their advice. By contrast, the Government side, has, apparently, been a bit slow to engage. Labour must seize the agenda, and there are many Labour sympathisers who would help them; a recent poll showed the third sector is overwhelmingly in support of Labour.

I believe that the Tories play up the charity agenda in part because they’re looking for excuses to cut the public services. But there’s no contradiction. Strong public services, universally delivered, are the essence of what Labour is fighting for. Sweden provides a good example of this. It probably has the world’s most extensive welfare state – paid for by high taxes – and yet is has one of the highest rates of volunteering. According to Gwladys Fouché writing in the Guardian, around 48% of Sweden’s adult population is regularly engaged in this activity.

And the security provided by strong public services appears to give people the physical and psychological resources to help others: “The welfare state plays a very important part by giving people the practical and mental space necessary to be able to be active. It creates possibilities for citizens.” Collaboration between the voluntary and public sectors is what matters to make a better society.

All good background, I think, for Labour’s manifesto.

Tagged in Movement, Communities, Culture.




Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →