Miliband and Jowell join forces to meet the mutual moment

February 8, 2010 11:05 pm

CoopBy Alex Smith / @alexsmith1982

In a signal that Labour is serious about mutual ideas underpinning its election manifesto, Tessa Jowell and Ed Miliband gathered at Downing Street today with representatives from social enterprises, local mutual healthcare providers, corporate co-operative leaders and business representatives to discuss the strategic framework for how the Government might move towards an increased role for mutuals in the personalisation of public services.

Tessa Jowell told me last year that mutualism is the “next stage of New Labour“, and it is thought the mutual and co-operative models will be at the core of Labour’s election manifesto.

The seminar today involved some 30 mutual and co-operative leaders from across different sectors and sought to develop the types of mechanisms that might help deliver mutualism as a defining, overarching policy objective.

The seminar covered two main topics: why this is the right time for increased user-involvement in public services; and ways Government can help in creating the circumstances under which mutuals can thrive.

The following is a summary of some of the ideas discussed by the group:

Meeting the Moment
* There is a broad consensus that the moment for more mutual and personalised public services has arrived, a moment created by the global economic crisis and the public’s increased desire for lower risk and more accountability.

* There is a need to match increased expectations of modern public services with an acceptance of the reality of tighter public finance – mutualism provides that.

* Services should move away from being principally bureaucratic and towards something people can genuinely participate in and shape.

* The process has already begun – in Foundation Trust hospitals, housing co-ops, Sure Start centres and co-op trust schools. Mutual and co-operative public services are already used by at least 2 million people and manage £10 billion of taxpayers’ money for the provision of services.

Overcoming the Obstacles
* There should be an expansion of the knowledge base about how mutuals work and are set up, by creating a shortlist of successful model types for dissemination as best practise guides.

* Local authorities should default to offering mutual and co-operative solutions to make the establishment of user-run services easier, and commissionable locally.

* Government should provide the investment for pilot schemes where appropriate.

* Government should seek to create the envionment in which mutuals can thrive through a Community Reinvestment Act, which has led to a trillion dollar investment in lower-income areas in the United States.

* The right to request mutualisation should be granted at local authority level.

* There should be a reduction and diversification of types of inspection and regulation of public services – bespoke for mutuals and co-ops – in order to remove barriers to establishing and managing user-run services.

* Practical and legal advice should be offered on how to establish and manage mutuals.

* Central financial investments should be made for pension funds within co-operative services.


Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    Housing upheaval can be traced back to Thatcher

    If further evidence was needed that the Government is destroying our communities then it came by the bucket load with proposals to relocate hundreds of housing benefit claimants. Councils across London desperately searched for a solution to the housing benefit cap that made it impossible for some of the capital’s poorest residents to stay in their homes. First we heard of plans to move residents to Darlington, Stoke, Hull and parts of Yorkshire. But the revelation that Westminster Council planned [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The austerity consensus has collapsed

    The austerity consensus has collapsed

    There is no alternative: the only way out of Britain’s current economic plight is massive cuts to public spending. Taxes on the wealthiest must be slashed: they are blocks on aspiration and economically counterproductive. Austerity is the only game in town. Or so we have been told ever since the Coalition was formed in the rose gardens of Number 10 Downing Street. The overwhelming majority of the media has gladly reinforced the Government line, and those voices calling for an [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Should Labour go further on football reform?

    Should Labour go further on football reform?

    “As a party, Labour should take great pride in the fact that we initiated Supporters Direct, but now is the time to go further.” These sentiments, expressed in a recent article for Progress by Steve Rotheram MP, hark back to a time where the landscape was somewhat different for the Labour party, but similar in many ways to that faced by football supporters in 2012. The Football Taskforce was established soon after Labour came to power in 1997, with the [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Making Labour Policy: Who calls the tune?

    Excellent election results and rising polls have brought a mood of unity and created space and time for serious work on policy. Francois Hollande’s victory shows that austerity is not the only option, and Labour must start to develop an alternative agenda, rejecting the Tory politics of resentment and division in favour of policies which are fair, principled and credible: on housing, crime, transport, health, schools, higher education, manufacturing, tax, defence, social care, equality, employment rights and the environment. We [...]

    Read more →
  • News It’s the budget what won it…

    It’s the budget what won it…

    Why did Labour win the 2010 local elections so convincingly? It’s the budget right? This graph of polling from TNS BMRB certainly suggests that. Labour’s slim lead extends rapidly following the budget (highlighted) – and current stands at 12 points (42/30). And as for why Labour did better in 2012 compared to the 2011 elections – just compare May and May 2012. A year is a long time in politics…

    Read more →