Miliband and Jowell join forces to meet the mutual moment

February 8, 2010 11:05 pm

CoopBy Alex Smith / @alexsmith1982

In a signal that Labour is serious about mutual ideas underpinning its election manifesto, Tessa Jowell and Ed Miliband gathered at Downing Street today with representatives from social enterprises, local mutual healthcare providers, corporate co-operative leaders and business representatives to discuss the strategic framework for how the Government might move towards an increased role for mutuals in the personalisation of public services.

Tessa Jowell told me last year that mutualism is the “next stage of New Labour“, and it is thought the mutual and co-operative models will be at the core of Labour’s election manifesto.

The seminar today involved some 30 mutual and co-operative leaders from across different sectors and sought to develop the types of mechanisms that might help deliver mutualism as a defining, overarching policy objective.

The seminar covered two main topics: why this is the right time for increased user-involvement in public services; and ways Government can help in creating the circumstances under which mutuals can thrive.

The following is a summary of some of the ideas discussed by the group:

Meeting the Moment
* There is a broad consensus that the moment for more mutual and personalised public services has arrived, a moment created by the global economic crisis and the public’s increased desire for lower risk and more accountability.

* There is a need to match increased expectations of modern public services with an acceptance of the reality of tighter public finance – mutualism provides that.

* Services should move away from being principally bureaucratic and towards something people can genuinely participate in and shape.

* The process has already begun – in Foundation Trust hospitals, housing co-ops, Sure Start centres and co-op trust schools. Mutual and co-operative public services are already used by at least 2 million people and manage £10 billion of taxpayers’ money for the provision of services.

Overcoming the Obstacles
* There should be an expansion of the knowledge base about how mutuals work and are set up, by creating a shortlist of successful model types for dissemination as best practise guides.

* Local authorities should default to offering mutual and co-operative solutions to make the establishment of user-run services easier, and commissionable locally.

* Government should provide the investment for pilot schemes where appropriate.

* Government should seek to create the envionment in which mutuals can thrive through a Community Reinvestment Act, which has led to a trillion dollar investment in lower-income areas in the United States.

* The right to request mutualisation should be granted at local authority level.

* There should be a reduction and diversification of types of inspection and regulation of public services – bespoke for mutuals and co-ops – in order to remove barriers to establishing and managing user-run services.

* Practical and legal advice should be offered on how to establish and manage mutuals.

* Central financial investments should be made for pension funds within co-operative services.


Related posts:

  1. This is our mutual moment
  2. The Mutual Moment: Tweets from Tessa Jowell’s Progress Speech
  3. Tessa Jowell: Manchester’s Co-ops show us the future of public services
  4. Mutual banks – the anchor of our future stability?
  5. Compass, Progress and the Fabians join forces to pressure PM on reform

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why I went from Blue to Red

    Why I went from Blue to Red

    Saturday May 15th 2010 is a day which will stay in my mind for some time. It is the day I joined the Labour Party. You might not think there is anything special in that, but for the previous 6 years I had been a member of the Conservatives. I should have joined Labour much sooner, growing up in a working class household and benefiting as I did from so many of their policies: EMA enabled me to go to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Labour needs a prawn cocktail offensive for all businesses, not just small firms

    Both Jacqui Smith and Dermot Finch have written in recent days about the need for Labour to embark on a new “prawn cocktail offensive” to charm the business community. I agree with Jacqui and Dermot and I’m optimistic about the reception Labour is likely to receive from the business community, provided we have the courage to engage with all businesses – small firms, mid-caps and large corporates. This doesn’t mean deviating from the responsible capitalism agenda. If business wants more [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Local Government Why we’re raising council tax

    Why we’re raising council tax

    Nobody wants to pay more tax and I am not a high tax and spend politician, so my administration’s proposed rejection of the government’s council tax funding has not been based on ideological dogma, but a reasoned decision based on financial prudence. I led my group to win control of City of York Council in May 2011. We inherited from the previous Liberal Democrat administration a budget with £21m of in year cuts to make, a number of previously unexposed [...]

    Read more →
  • Local Government News Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Boris and the 2 billion pound “clerical error”

    Earlier today on BBC’s London Politics Show, it was revealed that billions of pounds were inaccurately added to Boris Johnson’s official budget document – a mistake that a spokesperson for the Tory Mayor attempted to dismiss as a “clerical error”. At over £2 billion – that’s some clerical error… A spokesperson for Ken Livingstone said: “Boris Johnson claims anyone arguing for lower fares for Londoners doesn’t understand the transport finances, but now it turns out it’s Boris Johnson’s transport figures [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    The sad truth behind Andrew Lansley’s eyes

    “Michael,” said the Prime Minister, without looking up from his desk, “I thought you said this would be easy?” “Easy? That what would be easy?” replied the Education Secretary, whose face had occupied a near-permanent state of mild bafflement, which was slowly becoming the kind of ever-present British institution that decades from now will be ruined by ill-thought out reforms, or having a roof built over it in case it rains. “This NHS business. You said it would be easy.” [...]

    Read more →