Marriage Equality – Act now

September 24, 2010 3:11 pm

LGBT LabourBy Daryn McCombe / @daryn_mccombe

This year, at our AGM, LGBT Labour overwhelmingly passed a motion calling for equality in marriage and now we have succeeded in getting our contemporary resolution into the priority ballot this Sunday at Labour Party Conference in Manchester – now we need you to make this a reality.

If enough CLP and Trade Union delegates vote for it then we will have a debate which could see the Labour Party calling for, campaigning on and delivering full marriage equality for LGBT people across the UK.

Our motion calls for full equality in civil marriage for the LGBT community and full equality for the heterosexual community in civil partnerships. It will also mean that Trans people do not need to dissolve their current marriage or civil partnership provided that they and their partner agree to continue their relationship.

Even today LGBT rights campaigners are using this campaign to attack the Labour Party. But lets get one thing clear at the beginning – Labour, in power, did more for LGBT rights at home and abroad than any other British government. Labour has a proud record of equality and it is at the heart of our movement. But now is the time to go further.

There are 3 main reasons why I think delegates should support us on Sunday. 1) Separate is never fully equal, 2) its about liberty and 3) now is the right time.

1) Separate is never fully equal

I accept that the legal difference between Civil Partnerships and Civil Marriage is minimal in the sense they were an important advance and corrected many of the past injustices experienced by LGBT people. But small legal differences can lead to big social divisions. Social attitudes often aren’t shaped by the subtleties of legal debate but by the words that we use. At my civil partnership ceremony next year I will not be allowed to marry, instead I will register my civil partnership. The sentence leaves you cold and lacks the social meaning that marriage has behind it. Peter Tatchell puts it like this:

“Some people say that civil partnerships are sufficient for gay couples. This is hypocritical. They would not accept a similar ban on black people getting married.”

“They would never agree with a law that required black couples to register their relationships through a separate system called civil partnerships.”

“It would be racist to have separate laws for black and white couples. We’d call it apartheid, like what used to exist in South Africa. Well, black people are not banned from marriage but lesbian and gay couples are.”

Civil Partnerships were a massive achievement of which the whole party can be proud. But now is the time to reach further, to press on towards full equality – this motion does this, because whilst we are separate we can never be fully equal.

2) Its about liberty

Labour must once again become the champion of liberty. It cannot be right the state interferes in anyones personal relationships unless of course they are threatening or abusive in any way. How can it be right for two people who are married and want to stay together to be forced to divorce? It can’t, yet that is what the law forces married Trans people to do. Of course it’s important to ensure that the partners of Trans have the option to dissolve their marriages or civil partnerships but when a loving couple want to stay together the state should not interfere.

In the same way two people should have the freedom to choose the form in which their relationship is recognised by their families, friends and the state. If two men in a loving committed relationship want to have a civil marriage provided by the state, why shouldn’t they? Similarly if a woman and a man want a civil partnership why can’t they have one?

This motion is about people’s liberty and the right to choose how their relationship is recognised.

3) Now is the right time

Every single progressive move in modern history has been made by a Labour government. From race relations to gender equality Labour has been at the forefront of progressive change in our country.

All five of our leadership candidates are on record as supporting full marriage equality so whoever is declared the winner of the Labour leadership contest on Saturday they are ready to lead; all they need is a party that will follow.

Now is not the time for us to shirk this leadership. This week the Lib Dem Conference voted overwhelmingly in favour of marriage and Civil Partnership equality. I welcome their support for equality but they are locked into a coalition with the same old Tories who are unlikely to allow this to go forwards. No doubt the Tories want to gain some progressive credentials by talking about the issue but it is action not words that matter.

Public attitude is with us too. A survey for the Times in June 2009 cited 61% of the public in favour of the statement “Gay couples should have an equal right to get married, not just to have civil partnerships” only 33% disagreed.

Now is the right time for this motion to ensure Labour is at the fore front of the fight for equality.

If you’re a CLP or Trade Union Delegate you can help us
1. by voting for our motion in the priority ballot – remember the Trade Unions have the voting power to get their four motions onto the order paper – so CLP delegates can feel free to back our motion number one.

If you’re a CLP or Trade Union Delegate or if you’re attending conference you can help us
1. by lobbying your delegates to vote for our motion
2. by campaigning with us outside the leadership conference on Saturday and the conference venue on Sunday
3. by coming to our party

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Labour could lose out by not making it’s stance on Trident clear

    Labour could lose out by not making it’s stance on Trident clear

    Cutting Trident will be the price of support in a hung parliament. That’s the news reported from a meeting of the SNP, Plaid Cymru and Green leaders this week. With Labour’s slim lead and the SNP and Green vote threatening to impact on its share, this is a serious issue. Labour’s policy clearly states, ‘Labour has said that we are committed to a minimum, credible independent nuclear deterrent, delivered through a Continuous At-Sea Deterrent. It would require a clear body […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Is Cameron “frit” of TV debates? Let’s try the empty chair threat

    Is Cameron “frit” of TV debates? Let’s try the empty chair threat

    Lord Ashcroft has told him he shouldn’t have done it in 2010. Lynton Crosby has told him not to do it in 2015. It’s no surprise that David Cameron is trying to wriggle out of televised leader debates during the General Election – even though he has said he is willing to take part “in principle”. Time perhaps to dust off one of Margaret Thatcher’s favourite barbs “He’s frit.” Neil Kinnock tried it in 1992 to try to goad John Major into […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Flexibility makes for good work, strong families and thriving communities

    Flexibility makes for good work, strong families and thriving communities

    By Stephen Timms MP and Ian Murray MP The Christmas period reminds us that modern life can be busy, hurried and demanding. The pressures of work, demands of family life and hectic Christmas schedules can prove stretching as we juggle competing demands. Increasingly the need for flexible work is driven by the complex shape of people’s lives; as parents go to work, struggle to make ends meet, perform career roles, take their children to school and activities and try and carve […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour MP questions campaigning roles of publicly funded advisers

    Labour MP questions campaigning roles of publicly funded advisers

    As the start of the long campaign begins today, curbing the amount of money parties can spend between now and May 7th, Labour MP Jon Ashworth has sought to clarify what precautions are being taken to ensure publicly-funded government advisers are not using their time campaigning. Ashworth has sent a letter to senior civil servant Jeremy Heywood, asking him to answer a number of questions about what kind of campaigning activity was permitted and undertaken by special advisers (SpAds) in […]

    Read more →
  • News Berger asks Twitter to do more to stop use of racist words

    Berger asks Twitter to do more to stop use of racist words

    Luciana Berger, Shadow Minister for Public Health, has called on Twitter to do more the stop racist terms being used on the site. Berger has herself faced a large amount of anti-semitic abuse on the site, and in October Garron Helm  was jailed for sending her a torrent of anti-semitic messages. Berger told the Telegraph (£): “At the height of the abuse, the police said I was the subject of 2,500 hate messages in the space of three days using […]

    Read more →