Marriage Equality – Act now

September 24, 2010 3:11 pm

LGBT LabourBy Daryn McCombe / @daryn_mccombe

This year, at our AGM, LGBT Labour overwhelmingly passed a motion calling for equality in marriage and now we have succeeded in getting our contemporary resolution into the priority ballot this Sunday at Labour Party Conference in Manchester – now we need you to make this a reality.

If enough CLP and Trade Union delegates vote for it then we will have a debate which could see the Labour Party calling for, campaigning on and delivering full marriage equality for LGBT people across the UK.

Our motion calls for full equality in civil marriage for the LGBT community and full equality for the heterosexual community in civil partnerships. It will also mean that Trans people do not need to dissolve their current marriage or civil partnership provided that they and their partner agree to continue their relationship.

Even today LGBT rights campaigners are using this campaign to attack the Labour Party. But lets get one thing clear at the beginning – Labour, in power, did more for LGBT rights at home and abroad than any other British government. Labour has a proud record of equality and it is at the heart of our movement. But now is the time to go further.

There are 3 main reasons why I think delegates should support us on Sunday. 1) Separate is never fully equal, 2) its about liberty and 3) now is the right time.

1) Separate is never fully equal

I accept that the legal difference between Civil Partnerships and Civil Marriage is minimal in the sense they were an important advance and corrected many of the past injustices experienced by LGBT people. But small legal differences can lead to big social divisions. Social attitudes often aren’t shaped by the subtleties of legal debate but by the words that we use. At my civil partnership ceremony next year I will not be allowed to marry, instead I will register my civil partnership. The sentence leaves you cold and lacks the social meaning that marriage has behind it. Peter Tatchell puts it like this:

“Some people say that civil partnerships are sufficient for gay couples. This is hypocritical. They would not accept a similar ban on black people getting married.”

“They would never agree with a law that required black couples to register their relationships through a separate system called civil partnerships.”

“It would be racist to have separate laws for black and white couples. We’d call it apartheid, like what used to exist in South Africa. Well, black people are not banned from marriage but lesbian and gay couples are.”

Civil Partnerships were a massive achievement of which the whole party can be proud. But now is the time to reach further, to press on towards full equality – this motion does this, because whilst we are separate we can never be fully equal.

2) Its about liberty

Labour must once again become the champion of liberty. It cannot be right the state interferes in anyones personal relationships unless of course they are threatening or abusive in any way. How can it be right for two people who are married and want to stay together to be forced to divorce? It can’t, yet that is what the law forces married Trans people to do. Of course it’s important to ensure that the partners of Trans have the option to dissolve their marriages or civil partnerships but when a loving couple want to stay together the state should not interfere.

In the same way two people should have the freedom to choose the form in which their relationship is recognised by their families, friends and the state. If two men in a loving committed relationship want to have a civil marriage provided by the state, why shouldn’t they? Similarly if a woman and a man want a civil partnership why can’t they have one?

This motion is about people’s liberty and the right to choose how their relationship is recognised.

3) Now is the right time

Every single progressive move in modern history has been made by a Labour government. From race relations to gender equality Labour has been at the forefront of progressive change in our country.

All five of our leadership candidates are on record as supporting full marriage equality so whoever is declared the winner of the Labour leadership contest on Saturday they are ready to lead; all they need is a party that will follow.

Now is not the time for us to shirk this leadership. This week the Lib Dem Conference voted overwhelmingly in favour of marriage and Civil Partnership equality. I welcome their support for equality but they are locked into a coalition with the same old Tories who are unlikely to allow this to go forwards. No doubt the Tories want to gain some progressive credentials by talking about the issue but it is action not words that matter.

Public attitude is with us too. A survey for the Times in June 2009 cited 61% of the public in favour of the statement “Gay couples should have an equal right to get married, not just to have civil partnerships” only 33% disagreed.

Now is the right time for this motion to ensure Labour is at the fore front of the fight for equality.

If you’re a CLP or Trade Union Delegate you can help us
1. by voting for our motion in the priority ballot – remember the Trade Unions have the voting power to get their four motions onto the order paper – so CLP delegates can feel free to back our motion number one.

If you’re a CLP or Trade Union Delegate or if you’re attending conference you can help us
1. by lobbying your delegates to vote for our motion
2. by campaigning with us outside the leadership conference on Saturday and the conference venue on Sunday
3. by coming to our party

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Featured Miliband announces plans to scrap the Lords – and introduce an elected Senate of Nations and Regions

    Miliband announces plans to scrap the Lords – and introduce an elected Senate of Nations and Regions

    In a speech to Labour’s North West regional conference in Manchester, Ed Miliband will announce that a Labour government would abolish the House of Lords and replace it with an elected Senate. That has (broadly speaking) been Labour policy for some time. But there’s a twist. Miliband wants this new Senate to be a representative body made up of those from all of Britain’s Nations and Regions, as part of a new constitutional settlement to be decided by a constitutional […]

    Read more →
  • News Miliband speaks out on anti-semitic abuse targeted at Luciana Berger – and calls on social media companies to act

    Miliband speaks out on anti-semitic abuse targeted at Luciana Berger – and calls on social media companies to act

    As we reported last week, Labour MP and Shadow Minister Luciana Berger has been the victim of a sustained torrent of disgusting online anti-semtic abuse. Ed Miliband has hit out at Berger’s abusers today, calling on social media companies to be more proactive in tackling sustained, orchestrated abuse. He told Jewish News: “The anti-Semitic abuse that Luciana Berger has experienced over recent days is utterly appalling and has absolutely no place in our country. We must have no tolerance for this vile […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The debate about building ‘the homes we need’ has to go beyond numbers

    The debate about building ‘the homes we need’ has to go beyond numbers

    Big numbers abound in housing debates and rightly so. Two-hundred thousand new homes – the number the Labour frontbench has committed to building annually – is a response to the housing crisis that is starting to approach the scale we need. But the debate about building ‘the homes we need’ has to go beyond numbers. To make the point, look at the extreme case of ‘buy-to-leave’ homes that are bought off-plan as investors’ latest fancy and sit there empty in […]

    Read more →
  • Comment The mansion tax is a progressive tax and Labour in London should support it

    The mansion tax is a progressive tax and Labour in London should support it

    For those of us who believe in progressive taxation the last few weeks in London Labour have been pretty dismal. We seem to have an array of Labour MPs (mainly wannabe London mayoral candidates) and council leaders rushing to the press denouncing the proposed mansion tax as a’ tax on London’ (or if they were more honest a tax on the rich parts of London). Yes the promotion of the Mansion Tax has been inept and it would more accurate […]

    Read more →
  • Comment It’s time to put the Green Belt back on the table

    It’s time to put the Green Belt back on the table

    The UK’s housing crisis has finally been recognised across the political spectrum as an issue that needs urgent attention. Yet despite this consensus, political inertia on housebuilding has seen subsequent governments fail to create policies that address the issue coherently and strategically. Labour’s recent Lyons Review demonstrates a commitment to house-building, with a target of constructing 200,000 homes a year. Yet while the Review recognises that the housing crisis is not evenly spread, requiring different solutions in different places, there is […]

    Read more →