Cameron speech reveals the real Tory end game

October 6, 2010 3:50 pm

Cameron angryBy Mark Ferguson / @markfergusonuk

David Cameron’s speech today was directed predominantly at his party rather than the country (in contrast to Ed Miliband’s speech last week, which was the opposite).

It is remarkable that a man who has won his party’s first election in thirteen years only five months ago felt the need to fawn to his party so obviously. Ingratiating himself to the room through references to party darlings Pickles and Osborne was a plea for easy applause. Nostalgia, nationalist tub-thumping and attacks on Labour followed to inspire the crowd in the room, rather than the audience at home. The wink and a nudge to the eurosceptic right was calculated to say “I’m one of you”. The torturous attempt at a football joke that suggested Cameron isn’t entirely comfortable with sporting lingo was an attempt to be ‘just a normal guy’.

But more importantly in this speech weighed down with anecdotes, there was a glimpse of a future from the Tories, and the first real sight of a Tory end-game for this parliament.

Cameron talked about the ways in which the money spent on servicing the debt could otherwise be used. Here was an opprtunity to provide a list of big Tory ideas – ways in which an intelligent use of a future windfall could benefit the British people, or rebuild the communities that will be shattered by years of savage cuts. Instead, Cameron talked of the millions of people who could benefit from tax cuts (a nod towards a pre-election giveaway), and perhaps more importantly, lifting all businesses out of corporation tax. This may be a different Tory Party, but there economics are the same, and so is their end game – small state, low-taxes and little interest in high-quality, well-funded public services.

What we’ve seen here is a brief, perhaps unguarded look into the future, and into the psyche of Cameron and his team. When it comes to the Big Society that he hopes will come after the big cut – it’ll be tax cuts for businesses – rather than investment in public spending – that we can expect. These aren’t cuts in the national interest, these are cuts in the ideological interest. That’s the real story of Cameron’s speech today.

Comments are closed

Latest

  • Comment Why Labour is fighting for the legalisation of Humanist marriages today

    Why Labour is fighting for the legalisation of Humanist marriages today

    Monday saw the first day of Committee on the Same Sex Marriage Bill, where it became clear after a three hour debate on how to distinguish Same Sex Marriage from so called “traditional” marriage that opposition to this bill has not gone away. Despite a huge defeat on Second Reading, opponents reheated and repeated their earlier speeches, in part because their arguments rely on belief and prejudice not evidence or fact. So we sat until 11pm debating conscience clauses, Registrars [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment Sometimes what is unsaid at PMQs is the most important thing of all…

    Sometimes what is unsaid at PMQs is the most important thing of all…

    Well that was a bad PMQs for Ed Miliband – the second in a row. Perhaps he hasn’t gotten back into his stride after such a long period without the weekly Wednesday joust, but whatever it is, Miliband isn’t hitting his marks at PMQs. Meanwhile Cameron – who has been jousting with world leaders this week – seemed far more o top of his game than we’ve been used to seeing him lately. Alas the problem for Miliband was that [...]

    Read more →
  • Video Cameron refuses to answer question on secret government plans to hike interest on student loans

    Cameron refuses to answer question on secret government plans to hike interest on student loans

    Last week it was revealed that the government discussed secret plans to hike interest on pre-existing student loans, meaning that anyone with a student loan will be expected to pay far more than expected. Today, the Prime Minister was asked about this – he spoke for nearly a minute but wouldn’t answer the question. What does he have to hide? How much more does he expect graduates to pay?

    Read more →
  • Comment Who benefits? Delivering on energy and infrastructure

    Who benefits? Delivering on energy and infrastructure

    Across the industrial north, it is striking how old pit villages and industrial towns are proving far less willing to embrace renewable energy than the noisier, more polluting fossil fuels and industries which shaped their identity. Energy companies are getting a nasty shock after mistakenly believing that these communities would not bat an eyelid at a few wind turbines on the surrounding hills because they had been content to make huge slag heaps part of the landscape in decades past. [...]

    Read more →
  • News Put reckless bankers in jail – Media roundup: June 19th, 2013

    Put reckless bankers in jail – Media roundup: June 19th, 2013

    Subscribers to our morning email get the best of LabourList – including the Media and blog round up – every weekday morning. If you were a subscriber you would have already received this (and much more) in your inbox. You can sign up here. Put reckless bankers in jail Britain’s banking bosses should face jail if their decisions force fresh bailouts, the Parliamentary Commission on Banking Standards says today. The commission’s hotly anticipated report urges the Chancellor, George Osborne, to oversee the [...]

    Read more →