Dugher writes to Cameron seeking “immediate clarity” on donations

25th March, 2012 12:22 pm

After today’s big splash in the Sunday Times (and the subsequent resignation of Tory Co-Treasurer Peter Cruddas), Michael Dugher MP has written to the Prime Minister asking “immediate clarity” on a number of issues related to donations. The letter can be read below.

—————-

Dear Prime Minister,

I write to you following reports in the Sunday Times today of rich individuals being offered access to, and influence upon, the heart of your Government in return for sizeable cash donations.

Suggestions that in return for large donations individuals can be granted direct access to you and the opportunity to influence policy via submissions to your Number 10 Policy Unit are incredibly serious.

When ordinary doctors and nurses have had their views so completely ignored on the issue of the disastrous NHS reorganisation, it will be all the more frustrating to hear that someone who could afford a quarter of a million pounds seems able to ensure their voice is listened too.

This is not about Peter Cruddas or any individual. It is about the way your Government is conducted.

In Opposition you said that “sunshine is the best disinfectant”. I agree. It is vital that we now have full transparency in this matter. Therefore I would ask you for immediate clarity on the following issues:

· Which donors to the Conservative Party have visited No10 Downing Street, Chequers or Dorneywood since May 2010?

· Which donors to the Conservative Party have made submissions to the Number 10 Policy Unit, both orally and written, when were these made, and on what topics?

· In particular, in light of this week’s Budget, will you provide details of all donors who have made representations, both written and orally, on changes to the 50p tax rate?

· In the light of these allegations can you explain why – as reported in the Independent newspaper on 22 October 2011 – you personally intervened in the Sir Christopher Kelly’s investigation into party funding to request that the Committee on Standards in Public Life revise draft proposals to introduce a cap on large donations – a proposal which if implemented would have prevented such allegations of large cash donations for access ever arising?

On 8 February 2010, you said that lobbying was “the next big scandal waiting to happen. It’s an issue that crosses party lines and has tainted our politics for too long, an issue that exposes the far-too-cosy relationship between politics, government, business and money.” For all those words action by your Government to address this is long overdue.

Today you said that you would ensure there was “a proper party inquiry” into these matters. However, given the seriousness of the allegations about how Government is conducted, it is not appropriate for the Conservative Party to investigate itself. We need a full, independent inquiry. Therefore I ask that you now request the Independent Adviser on Standards in Public Life to launch an inquiry into this matter, to answer these and any other related questions he sees fit.

I look forward to your response.

Yours sincerely,

Michael Dugher MP

  • William

    This seems to me to be the minimal demand we should make. Don’t we also need to know the dates of  the hitherto secret Premiership dinners and who was at them? This should then lead us to the policy requests and implementations.

  • TomFairfax

    I’ve just made a quick check of the contents of the Bribery Act 2010. Talk about the law of unintended consequences.

    Obviously a legal bod would be needed for at least one professional opinion, but it seems to me that soliciting for or accepting bribes are both crimes.

    Some clarification is needed on defining the difference between a business/organisation/individual being asked for a large ‘donation’ to be paid directly, or to intermediaries, being a crime according to this legislation, and somehow not being a crime if the recipient is a British politician or political party.

    The Bribery Act 2010 is quite clear in that it supercedes previous legislation.

    Given HMRC today apparently can’t define what bread is, this looks a bit tricky to swat away quickly.

    • Jimmy S

       I’m surprised no-one has mentioned this.  My initial reaction to this was that this is first and foremost a police matter.

Latest

  • News Nick Forbes elected new leader of Labour’s local government group

    Nick Forbes elected new leader of Labour’s local government group

    Leader of Newcastle City Council Nick Forbes was this weekend elected to succeed Jim McMahon as leader of Labour’s Local Government Association (LGA) group. The result was announced at the party’s Local Government conference in Nottingham, after voting by English and Welsh Labour council groups closed last Thursday. Forbes, who is widely seen as a ‘moderate’ within the party, was elected with 68% of the vote on a 74% turnout. He will present a report on local government to Labour’s […]

    Read more →
  • News Labour MPs set to lead All-Party Parliamentary Group on Proportional Representation

    Labour MPs set to lead All-Party Parliamentary Group on Proportional Representation

    Chuka Umunna and Johnny Reynolds today pledged their support for the cross-party campaign to introduce proportional representation. The former shadow ministers have signed up for the Make Votes Matter project which also includes UKIP MP Douglas Carswell, Green MP Caroline Lucas and several Lib Dem MPs. It comes after Reynolds tabled a backbench Bill on voting reform in the Commons in December 2015. Make Votes Matter has described the last General Election as the “most disproportionate election ever” in Britain. […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Europe There are no circumstances under which we would be better off outside the EU

    There are no circumstances under which we would be better off outside the EU

    As David Cameron jets round Europe to seal his EU reform deal, and with the various leave campaigns squabbling and in chaos, the big issues facing voters in the referendum mustn’t be lost. The EU referendum is not about the future of the prime minister or the dramas of the Tory Party or which mad right-winger is running which leave campaign, but about working people – about workers’ jobs and workers’ rights. It will be about trade. About security, consumer […]

    Read more →
  • News Momentum leak: Six things we learned

    Momentum leak: Six things we learned

    The agenda of Saturday’s meeting of the Momentum National Committee has found its way into the public domain. Here are six things we learned from it. 1) Momentum has raised £33,000 but has set its sights on more than £150,000 The group has raised £33,441.56 since October, mainly from online donations. However, it hopes an official membership structure would raise £150,000 a year. This would be from an annual fee of £10 a year or £1 a month. Momentum hopes […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Momentum to block supporters of rival parties from membership

    Momentum to block supporters of rival parties from membership

    Momentum, the controversial Corbynite pressure group, has confirmed that supporters of rival political parties will not be able to sign up. Leaked documents reveal Momentum’s blueprint to raise funds, take on Labour’s “moderates” and set up formal alliance with constituency parties. It has also confirmed a code of ethics that includes an opposition to “illegal wars” and Trident renewal, showing a strong reaction against Labour policy of recent decades. However, John McTernan, a former adviser to Tony Blair, has hit back at […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit