Dugher writes to Cameron seeking “immediate clarity” on donations

25th March, 2012 12:22 pm

After today’s big splash in the Sunday Times (and the subsequent resignation of Tory Co-Treasurer Peter Cruddas), Michael Dugher MP has written to the Prime Minister asking “immediate clarity” on a number of issues related to donations. The letter can be read below.

—————-

Dear Prime Minister,

I write to you following reports in the Sunday Times today of rich individuals being offered access to, and influence upon, the heart of your Government in return for sizeable cash donations.

Suggestions that in return for large donations individuals can be granted direct access to you and the opportunity to influence policy via submissions to your Number 10 Policy Unit are incredibly serious.

When ordinary doctors and nurses have had their views so completely ignored on the issue of the disastrous NHS reorganisation, it will be all the more frustrating to hear that someone who could afford a quarter of a million pounds seems able to ensure their voice is listened too.

This is not about Peter Cruddas or any individual. It is about the way your Government is conducted.

In Opposition you said that “sunshine is the best disinfectant”. I agree. It is vital that we now have full transparency in this matter. Therefore I would ask you for immediate clarity on the following issues:

· Which donors to the Conservative Party have visited No10 Downing Street, Chequers or Dorneywood since May 2010?

· Which donors to the Conservative Party have made submissions to the Number 10 Policy Unit, both orally and written, when were these made, and on what topics?

· In particular, in light of this week’s Budget, will you provide details of all donors who have made representations, both written and orally, on changes to the 50p tax rate?

· In the light of these allegations can you explain why – as reported in the Independent newspaper on 22 October 2011 – you personally intervened in the Sir Christopher Kelly’s investigation into party funding to request that the Committee on Standards in Public Life revise draft proposals to introduce a cap on large donations – a proposal which if implemented would have prevented such allegations of large cash donations for access ever arising?

On 8 February 2010, you said that lobbying was “the next big scandal waiting to happen. It’s an issue that crosses party lines and has tainted our politics for too long, an issue that exposes the far-too-cosy relationship between politics, government, business and money.” For all those words action by your Government to address this is long overdue.

Today you said that you would ensure there was “a proper party inquiry” into these matters. However, given the seriousness of the allegations about how Government is conducted, it is not appropriate for the Conservative Party to investigate itself. We need a full, independent inquiry. Therefore I ask that you now request the Independent Adviser on Standards in Public Life to launch an inquiry into this matter, to answer these and any other related questions he sees fit.

I look forward to your response.

Yours sincerely,

Michael Dugher MP

  • William

    This seems to me to be the minimal demand we should make. Don’t we also need to know the dates of  the hitherto secret Premiership dinners and who was at them? This should then lead us to the policy requests and implementations.

  • TomFairfax

    I’ve just made a quick check of the contents of the Bribery Act 2010. Talk about the law of unintended consequences.

    Obviously a legal bod would be needed for at least one professional opinion, but it seems to me that soliciting for or accepting bribes are both crimes.

    Some clarification is needed on defining the difference between a business/organisation/individual being asked for a large ‘donation’ to be paid directly, or to intermediaries, being a crime according to this legislation, and somehow not being a crime if the recipient is a British politician or political party.

    The Bribery Act 2010 is quite clear in that it supercedes previous legislation.

    Given HMRC today apparently can’t define what bread is, this looks a bit tricky to swat away quickly.

    • Jimmy S

       I’m surprised no-one has mentioned this.  My initial reaction to this was that this is first and foremost a police matter.

Latest

  • News Labour unveil their rural manifesto

    Labour unveil their rural manifesto

    Labour have today launched their rural manifesto, in which they outline how they’d ensure the economy works for people in rural areas. Labour’s plan includes a pledge to replace the Agricultural Wages Board (abolished by the coalition) with a taskforce that would address low pay and conditions for agricultural workers.  Alongside policies like the energy price freeze, the party’s rural manifesto (which you can read here) includes expanding the powers of the Groceries Code Adjudicator (the supermarket watchdog); cutting rates […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Video Ed Miliband: A Portrait

    Ed Miliband: A Portrait

    At the start of the campaign there was a suggestion that the focus might be on the wider Labour Party and the party at large rather than Miliband himself. But as Miliband’s approval ratings have improved, and the Labour leader is widely believed to have had a good campaign, that suggestion isn’t one that’s heard too much anymore. Tonight, the party released its latest party election broadcast, and the most Miliband-focussed for some time. It’s called “Ed Miliband: A Portrait”, […]

    Read more →
  • News Video Milibrand vs Brand – The Trailer

    Milibrand vs Brand – The Trailer

    The much awaited full interview is out tomorrow – but here’s the trailer. It doesn’t give much away – but it doesn’t look like Brand is going to give Miliband an easy ride…

    Read more →
  • Featured News Video Why won’t Michael Fallon rule out stabbing Britain in the back over Trident?

    Why won’t Michael Fallon rule out stabbing Britain in the back over Trident?

    Three weeks ago Michael Fallon went negative with an ugly and unpleasant attack on Ed Miliband, accusing him planning to stab Britain in the back over Trident renewal. Since then we’ve also had Boris Johnson repeating Fallon’s backstab myth (or should that be Lynton Crosby’s – we know who write’s the script). So imagine our surprise when we saw Michael Fallon – yes, the same Michael Fallon – repeatedly and cravenly refusing to rule out voting against Trident renewal under a […]

    Read more →
  • News Scotland Sturgeon gives backing to abusive Twitter troll candidate

    Sturgeon gives backing to abusive Twitter troll candidate

    Nicola Sturgeon has given her backing to the SNP candidate who until earlier this month was using an anonymous Twitter account to hurl abuse at pro-UK campaigners. The SNP leader came under pressure last week to suspend Neil Hay, the candidate for Edinburgh South, after it became clear he taken on an online pseudonym to mock pensioners and compare No vote supporters to Nazi collaborators. After a newspaper brought the account to the attention of the SNP, Hay deleted it […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends










Submit