There’s more to a “progressive internship” than pay

March 25, 2012 11:33 am

Ever since I was a paid intern myself, learning the ropes of a professional role in 2008, I’ve been a strong supporter of the principle of a fair day’s pay for a fair day’s work.

To my mind, if a young person is willing to offer time and enthusiasm to an organisation in exchange for experience, that organisation should recognise its responsibility to support its junior partner with everything it can reasonably give: training, skills and the money required to live above the poverty line.

I appreciate that there are challenges to this general principle. Many small businesses cannot afford to pay interns as much as they’d like, while the professional development and references they provide can nevertheless be invaluable to a young person’s development. And in politics, how do you distinguish between an “internship” and the free volunteerism and open activism which do so much to power our democracy?

Yet in spite of those grey areas, in these difficult times of record youth unemployment – and with access to good jobs in journalism, medicine and the law still firmly closed to the majority of young people – it’s more important than ever that the Labour Party campaigns for paid internships which open access to those who would most benefit from the new experiences which can lead to genuine social mobility.

What frustrates and concerns me, however, is that the debate about what constitutes a fair internship has become so narrowly focused on income alone. The assumption within the Labour Party, and the commentators and think tanks that so inform our direction, is that a paid internship is, by definition and of itself, enough to be progressive — that is to mean, that a job which pays a living wage is automatically more supportive of people from non-privileged backgrounds than one which doesn’t.

The danger of such a simplistic assumption is that it constrains our debate to one that begins and ends with access to income. In truth, we should be far more ambitious than that: our purpose and our politics should be about expanding access to opportunity as well.

So it is never enough, as I have encountered three or four times now, for any organisation to boast of its “progressive internships” policy, while those positions are then given to privately educated Oxbridge graduates from well-connected families. I have nothing against those young people from fortunate backgrounds. But they are already more likely to succeed in the professions than most. Internships should be about opening opportunities for people who might otherwise struggle to break down those most persistent of barriers.

Labour campaigners therefore need to broaden their definition of what makes a progressive internship. Pay should be one aspect of that campaign — but it should be the base minimum of our expectations of an enabling internship, not the Holy Grail. And those in the privileged positions to make hires should consider the value they can add to their young interns by looking beyond the traditional talent pools, and by recruiting young people from a range of backgrounds and with various qualifications and none. Only that way will we create truly progressive internships that support as many people as possible to be everything they can be.

  • GuyM

    Internships, like work experience or even standard employee hires is entirely at the discretion of the manager and organisation.

    Expecting anyone to chose one candidate over anothre on the basis of a worse background is simply going to cause a lot of laughter in the private sector.

  • TomFairfax

    Hi Alex,
    I have to admit I find the whole concept of internships an alien concept, as I’ve never worked in an industry that has such things.

    The nearest equivilent I guess would be a Summer job or sandwich training placement. Given the shortage of engineers, then clearly not paying and training would damage the organisations ability to recruit.

    I suspect the problem of internship exists because they are found only in those areas where there is in no way a shortage of applicants. However, not paying and training means putting obstacles in place to getting the best people for the roles, which must surely damage such an organisation in the long term.

    Still a good article. Nice to see you’re still around.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Mike-Homfray/510980099 Mike Homfray

    I think somewhere to live is pretty much vital – the problem is that I can’t imagine anyone not from the ‘correct’ networks thinking about taking this path

    • treborc

      I suspect being an intern depends a lot on how your willing to live, or whether your rich enough or your parents are.

  • http://twitter.com/GuidoFawkes Guido Fawkes

    I feel strongly about this, I know that if I had told my dad I was going to go work as an intern for free when I was 19 he’d have said no way. I think it should however be made legal to pay interns at apprentice rates even on short internships. Businesses can’t justify paying an intern the same as someone experienced when they don’t know there arse from their elbow.

    • John Ruddy

      I cant believe this – i agree with Guido Fawkes.

      I’m off for a lie down in a darkened room.

    • http://twitter.com/Rowan_Draper Rowan Draper

      I also feel strongly about this:
      Why should apprentices (or interns) earn a half of what someone on minimum wage earns, because of a perceived lack of skill? Is it right that someone training to be a better electrician, plumber, administrator is paid half of what a cleaner, waiter or retail shop worker earns? Someone experienced will command a different salary, if the business is doing the right thing, but they aren’t. Their role is to squeeze the books to make sure they get as much profit as possible, because what other point is there to being in business? It doesn’t provide justification to reduce candidates with less ‘experience’ to working for a pittance. There’s a standard for a reason.

      To be honest there’s a lot of ‘experienced’ people who don’t know their arse from their elbow yet they command a massive salary and I’m sick of it being used to villify (generally) younger people who are struggling to find work because the world is now a business-dominant labour market.

      Interns, who are generally graduates, cannot afford to be dropped back to the kinds of pay they could expect to receive when they were 16 (even if for a short time). The decisions government and business are taking are solely in their interest and not in the interest of people who cannot find work, who aren’t employed and are having the rest of their life stopped for a crisis they didn’t cause. 

      Suggestions that people can and should accept less than the going rate because a right-wing blogger, politician or think tank says we can’t afford it should end now. If the Government has enough money to blow on HS2, bungling WCML bids and a 40k tax break for the top earners in this country then they should have enough money to bring youth unemployment down to single digits.

Latest

  • Comment UKIP’s attitude to accountability should worry us all

    UKIP’s attitude to accountability should worry us all

    UKIP’s reaction to the allegations over the use of the party’s EU funding has been telling. It tells us that they are not yet ready to take the step up from a being an assortment of oddballs and cranks to a serious political party. After The Times ran their front page on Tuesday, UKIP’s immediate reaction was to denounce the paper as a mouthpiece for the establishment, rather than bother to refute what they felt was incorrect about the article. […]

    Read more →
  • Featured In praise of Simon Danczuk

    In praise of Simon Danczuk

    Simon Danczuk has led the front pages this week with his explosive account of how an MP could hide a lifetime of abusing children. The Westminster reaction to his Cyril Smith allegations? Embarrassed coughs. Good on Simon for having the courage to speak his mind. Since his 2010 election, itself a feat of endurance, he’s demonstrated a forensic mind and a canny eye for a story. He represents a diminishing Westminster breed, a ‘character’ who speaks with an authentic voice […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Swinging The Axe – Why hiring Axelrod means Miliband is going big

    Swinging The Axe – Why hiring Axelrod means Miliband is going big

    David Axelrod has been hired by Labour to work on the party’s general election campaign. First – let me get the excitement out. David Axelrod is the biggest star in the world when it comes to political campaigning. Nevermind “guru”, this guy is a campaigning deity in his own right. From Barack Obama’s Chicago kitchen table to the Oval Office was a journey that few thought possible, but Axelrod managed the shift from state senator, to Senator, to President in […]

    Read more →
  • News Video David Axelrod’s video message to Labour members and supporters

    David Axelrod’s video message to Labour members and supporters

    Labour’s new strategist David Axelrod – who helped get Obama elected in 2008 and 2012 – has recorded a message for Labour members and supporters. He argues that “It’s isn’t people like me who win these elections – it’s people like you” – here’s the video in full:

    Read more →
  • Comment 10 social history visits for British politicos

    10 social history visits for British politicos

    New Lanark (Lanarkshire) The Robert Owen Museum (Montgomeryshire) The People’s Palace (Glasgow) St Giles’ Cathedral (Edinburgh) The People’s History Museum (Manchester) The International Slavery Museum (Liverpool) Cable Street (London) The Holocaust Memorial Garden (London) The British Library (London) The Tolpuddle Martyrs Museum (Dorset) Obviously most LabourList readers think of this Saturday as part of the countdown to polling day but on the off-chance your organiser is letting you get any friends and family time this holiday weekend, here are ten […]

    Read more →