A credible alternative

28th May, 2012 9:31 am

In recent times, we’ve had a lot said about the need for us to be credible. It’s true that we need to win trust for our economic message – and I believe we’re well on the way to accomplish this. But competence alone does not address the lack of trust many of us pick up on the doorstep.

Over the years, I’ve noticed how big the rise in disillusionment has been on the doorstep. Many factors play into it – notably the anti-political stigma left by MPs’ expenses – but it is the utter bewilderment of the recession and austerity aftermath that is the biggest contributor. It’s pretty clear why.

The Tories and their Liberal sidekicks have championed There Is No Alternative. It is somewhat depressing being constantly told it’s all doomed and you just have to accept it. So when we come knocking to have a chat, the obvious question comes. What would you do differently?

Back in the better times, the dividing lines were clear. We would invest in public services. The Tories would threaten them. Vote Labour for better schools and hospitals. But even then there were issues like housing, where we had to find some unsatisfactory explanation for the lack of affordable homes, but unable to offer much hope. And it’s that pitfall we must avoid.

Times are very complicated, and our position as a democratic socialist party is not easy. But we would be mistaken if we let that hamper our role to provide people with a clear alternative to this rampant destruction of our welfare state, public services and quality of life. As the NHS is flogged off, how will we roll it back? As another fare hike is put through, will we freeze it back down? And as another attack on workplace rights is pushed through, will we undo it?

The common concept of credibility is misguided. It is too narrowly defined on fiscal measures alone. The starting point is so constrained that we risk ending up with an offer so bland it falls flat. We need to widen our criteria – to be a serious alternative to the current government as their credentials come into question. Our goal should be to make people’s lives better, to give them confidence and hope that if we were in power, things would improve. And I’m heartened to have heard Jon Cruddas, our new Policy Review co-ordinator speak of just this. It’s vital that our plans stand up to scrutiny, but our emphasis must be on our alternative vision to the Tory-led government, not what can’t be done.

We must be fiscally responsible for the long term, and expose false short-term economies. Closing down a Sure Start centre may help the council budget, but has a far greater long term cost for the local community. Likewise we should dare to make new spending commitments that would result in growth without adding to long term debt – like building social housing that would help provide new homes as well being cost neutral within a matter of years. Our plans should be fiscally sound, but backed by evidence, not just superficial posturing to look tough.

When it comes to our attitude to business, we must continue this approach. Ed Miliband’s call for responsible capitalism has given us an opportunity to go beyond our timid shell of the past, when any ideas that made the CBI uneasy were shot down by business or treasury ministers. We must fight the Beecroft report and the subsequent onslaught on rights at work that will result. But we must also think beyond this for our alternative vision, and how we can encourage businesses to grow by developing and better engaging with their staff, rather than by increasing insecurity.

It is right that we are diligent and know what we can afford to put right and when. But our goal must be to have bold, credible policies that will show people that there is an alternative, and that alternative is Labour.

Alon Or-bach is a London representative to the National Policy Form and a member of the Prosperity and Work policy commission

  • hp

    Yes, we need a credible plan to deal with the £milloin millon debt that the UK is lumbered with.
    Let me write that out in numbers: £1,000,000,000,000.
    Approximately £50,000 for every non-public sector worker.
    So, let’s hear that plan.
    That is just our immediate concern.
    We will have to deal with long-term pension costs next.

    • alonorbach

      Of course we will tackle debt, but we should not just posture to look tough. And we should pay it back – not just shift the burden from public to personal debt. Cutting services that end up costing people more to get privately, or forcing people out of work because they can’t afford childcare is the danger I’m talking about. Pensions another good example. As public sector pensions slashed bluntly, and no doubt we’ll hear arguments to cut back state pension more, that ‘saving’ will end up costing individuals even more.

      • hp

        Hard decisions need to be made.
        It is no use just ignoring it.  We need to find a way of eliminating our deficit while our interest rate is low.  Otherwise, when the cost of borrowing increases, debt interest will take an even larger share of public spending and there will be even less to spend on public services.
        You have to make those difficult decision if you want credibility.

        • treborc1

          Just like that?

          • hp

            The other piece of bad news:  we need to reduce public sector employment, too.
            As valuable as public servants are, they cannot make any net contribution to debt reduction. Also, that includes so-called private sector businesses that are funded by govt. contracts: a big ‘hello’ to much of the UK construction, medical and IT industries.
            At present, the debt burden falls upon too few shoulders.
            We need more people making net tax contributions and fewer non-contributors.
            Oh, and look forward to an extensive period of no economic growth, too.  Rebalancing our economy will not be easy.
            Hands up who still thinks that running up a huge national debt was a good idea.

          • treborc1

            Well a god old ww3 will do it. or Jesus  making a come back.

          • AlanGiles

            “Jesus  making a come back.”

            He already has – he was appearing at the Levenson enquiry today :-)Like

          • treborc1

            No crucifixion though the bloke could charm his way our of a war, or into one.

          • treborc1

            No crucifixion though the bloke could charm his way our of a war, or into one.

          • John Dore

            That will be most here, me excluded. Next question.

    • Trudge74 as alexwilliamz

      Here’s hoping you don’t have a mortgage. I’m guessing the average mortgage is probably over 100k per house owner! Scary

  • John Dore

    A mate of mine and I made the fatal mistake of discussing politics after a few pints on Saturday night. We’re both Labour but he’s far more let’s say committed than I. We agreed on just about everything and the one thing we were certain of was that Labour would not win the 2015 election.

    The most likely outcome was lib lab coalition.

  • John Dore


  • Featured News Corbyn appeals to Labour MPs before Syria vote

    Corbyn appeals to Labour MPs before Syria vote

    Jeremy Corbyn has this morning maintained his opposition to bombing ISIS in Syria and asked Labour MPs to “look carefully” at the whole situation in Syria before voting on the issue. This morning on the Andrew Marr Show, Labour’s leader revealed that 70,000 people have responded to the e-mail he sent out on Friday, asking them their views on airstrikes in Syria. A number of shadow cabinet members, who are thought to be in favour of airstrikes in Syria, were […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Unions A fair sharing economy?

    A fair sharing economy?

    Despite the clunky delivery, it is good to see Labour talking about what challenges we will face as the world of work changes dramatically. For many people that change is pretty daunting: it isn’t just accelerating, it’s spinning off in new directions. The digital revolution is connecting people in ways we could never have imagined five years ago. There are robots seemingly waiting to take just about every manual job and algorithms eyeing up a lot of the white collar middle management […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Full text of Jeremy Corbyn’s email to Labour Party members about Syria

    Full text of Jeremy Corbyn’s email to Labour Party members about Syria

    On Thursday David Cameron set out his case in the House of Commons for a UK bombing campaign in Syria. We have all been horrified by the despicable attacks in Paris and are determined to see ISIS defeated. The issue now is whether what the Prime Minister is proposing strengthens, or undermines, our national security. I put a series of questions in response to the Prime Minister’s statement, raising concerns about his case that are on the minds of many […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Uncategorized Corbyn turns to Labour Party members in Syria dispute

    Corbyn turns to Labour Party members in Syria dispute

    Jeremy Corbyn has emailed Labour Party members to ask their views on military action against Isis in Syria, as it has appears increasingly likely that the Shadow Cabinet will grant Labour MPs a free vote on the issue. In the email, the Labour Leader says that he does not “believe that the Prime Minister made a convincing case [on Thursday] that British airstrikes on Syria would strength our national security or reduce the threat from Isis.” “When I was elected […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Tom Watson backs airstrikes against Isil and says he has a mandate as Deputy Leader

    Tom Watson backs airstrikes against Isil and says he has a mandate as Deputy Leader

    Tom Watson backed airstrikes against Isil in Syria today, putting himself at odds with Jeremy Corbyn. Watson said he agrees with the Shadow Foreign Secretary, Hilary Benn, that “there is an imminent terrorist threat being directed from Syria” that requires a military response. And he insisted in a BBC interview that he would not resign from the Shadow Cabinet if Labour MPs were denied a free vote on the issue, as he is “the Deputy Leader of the Labour Party […]

    Read more →
Share with your friends