You are here: Home » News »

Cameron rebuked by UK stats chief over PMQs response

October 25, 2012 7:02 pm

Tags:

Share this Article

Yesterday we asked if Cameron had broken the law at PMQs, when he gave an answer that suggested today’s GDP figures would be good news. Today, he has been rebuked by the UK Statistics Agency chief Andrew Dilnot, who wrote the following letter to the PM:

25 October 2012

Dear Prime Minister

PRE-RELEASE ACCESS TO OFFICIAL STATISTICS

I was made aware during the course of yesterday afternoon of your remarks at Prime Minister’s Questions in respect of the economy, in particular your statement that “the good news will keep coming”. This was ahead of this morning’s Office for National Statistics release of the preliminary estimate of Gross Domestic Product for the third quarter of 2012, to which you receive pre-release access up to 24 hours ahead of publication.

A large number of commentators contacted my office to ask whether your remarks constituted a breach of the pre-release access rules. The Pre-Release Access to Official Statistics Order 2008 states that recipients of pre-release access must not disclose ‘any suggestion of the size or direction of any trend’ indicated by the statistic to which the recipient has been given such access. It is clear from media reports that, although this may not have been your intent, your remarks were indeed widely interpreted as providing an indication about the GDP figures.

The Statistics Authority’s position on pre-release access remains clear. We believe that the current practices for pre-release access to official statistics are unsatisfactory, not least because they put those who have received such access in a difficult position, especially when they have to speak in public after receiving access and before publication. The interpretation of your remarks is a clear example of the difficulties and risks created by the current arrangements. It is our view that the current pre-release access arrangements undermine public confidence in official statistics and the professional independence of
statisticians. Since responsibility for determining the pre-release rules continues to rest with government, we would urge you to undertake a Review of these arrangements and I would be happy to meet your senior officials to help in taking this forward.

Yours sincerely
Andrew Dilnot CBE

Related posts:

  1. Did Cameron break the law at PMQs?
  2. More PMQs whoppers from David Cameron
  3. Cameron under fire over PMQs “inaccuracies”
  4. PMQs Verdict: David Cameron looks very lonely indeed
  5. If Cameron really “relishes” PMQs, Labour will put that to the test
  • http://twitter.com/tristanpw1 TristanPriceWilliams

    Not much of a rebuke to someone who has broken the law.

    • jaime taurosangastre candelas

      Proof (of breaking the law) would be hard to establish.  All Cameron has to do is to claim that he was referring to so other future pieces of “good news” – nothing to do with statistics on GDP.  It is the interpretation of others of his remarks.

      • PeterBarnard

        If someone makes a remark that contains (an) ambiguity, Jaime, the fault lies with the person making the remark, not the person receiving it.

        The essence of communication is clarity.

        I must admit that when I heard him say it, I took it as political braggadocio, ie “we had good news last week and our policies are so good, the (medium-term) future will contain more good news.” Others constructed his remark differently.

        • jaime taurosangastre candelas

          But in law, the “burden” of proof is on the prosecutor, so while your first paragraph is true for general life, it is not true for the law, if someone wishes to specifically make a charge about someone breaking the law.  i.e. “prove it”.

          The law (about revealing privileged information) can be proven to exist and to be relevant.  What cannot be proven is that “at the back of his mind” Cameron had in mind the GDP figures, and not something else and completely different.  What remains is suspicion, but it is not enough to declare someone a law-breaker.

          • PeterBarnard

            I agree, Jaime. I “mislaid” the legal aspect.

  • Serbitar

    I worry less about Cameron’s indiscretion than his incompetence and cluelessness, neither of which can be improved or cured by a missive. Cameron is a man patently not fit to be Prime Minister.

  • Pingback: Straw men, straw men everywhere « A Mad Man With A Blog

Latest

  • Featured Technology isn’t just something for geeks to worry about

    Technology isn’t just something for geeks to worry about

    By Jim Knight

    If you Google ‘Ed Miliband,’ you quickly get the old stuff about him being a bit of geek. His appearance at Google’s big Tent on Wednesday almost begged the headline “Geek Goes Home”. But that assumes technology is just something for geeks to worry about, and that Ed is a techie. Neither are true. What we saw on Wednesday was a leader with the courage to tell Google straight that it should live up to its founding principles on the [...]

    Read more →
  • Featured Woolwich: The British people – and our politicians – have risen to the occasion

    Woolwich: The British people – and our politicians – have risen to the occasion

    By Mark Ferguson

    “We want to start a war” – Woolwich attacker “right now it is only you versus many people, you are going to lose” - Ingrid Loyau-Kennett Only 24 hours ago, news began to trickle through about a barbarous crime, committed on the streets of our capital city, in broad daylight. It seems that the murderers who attacked and brutally murdered a soldier felt they were acting in a way endorsed by their religious beliefs and their god. But to try and [...]

    Read more →
  • News Labour NEC Report – 21st May 2013

    Labour NEC Report – 21st May 2013

    By Johanna Baxter

    Party Organisation The General Secretary (GS) noted the party’s good performance in the recent Local, Mayoral and South Shields elections and thanked all members, activists and staff for their contribution to that success. The committee discussed the work of Blue State Digital who have been brought in to revolutionise the party’s use of new and social media as part of our suite of campaign tools. It was noted that Matthew McGregor, Head of Blue State Digital’s London Office and former [...]

    Read more →
  • News Labour’s London Assembly Leader responds to Woolwich attack

    Labour’s London Assembly Leader responds to Woolwich attack

    Following yesterday’s attack in Woolwich, Leader of the Labour Group on the London Assembly Len Duvall AM said: “The attack in Woolwich was horrific, the actions of local people in response and the head-teacher and staff at the school are a reflection of the values and strength of our community. “At this afternoon’s London Assembly Police and Crime Committee questions will be asked about yesterday’s attack and the response, and at a future assembly meeting we will come together to [...]

    Read more →
  • Comment If Labour is to build One Nation, it must be a safe and equal one for women

    If Labour is to build One Nation, it must be a safe and equal one for women

    By Ellie Cumbo

    Today End Violence Against Women (EVAW) releases a new report auditing the Government’s progress in acting to prevent violence against women and girls. And with the revelations from Operation Yewtree and group exploitation cases set to roll on for many months , we hope the response from Parliament, policy-makers and the media will be unanimous : that prevention must be at the top of the priority list for any government, of any colour, from now on. On that basis, it’s [...]

    Read more →