Ed Miliband and David Cameron: A Year in review

December 13, 2012 10:00 am

2012 has been a remarkable year in the fortunes of Ed Miliband.

He’s had political and professional successes, But he’s also gone from being “too ugly to be Prime Minister” to being an “unlikely sex symbol”.

OK, a puff piece about a Miliband visit shouldn’t be taken too seriously. But in January, when his leadership was at its lowest ebb, even the Labour supporting Mirror wouldn’t dream of running a headline calling Ed a “Sex symbol” – unlikely or not.

We often ask if politicians and political parties can be “attractive” to voters, but we usually mean in terms of their policies, philosophy and political offer. But the stereotypes that we all bring to public discourse make the qualities we frequently associate (rightly or not) with strong leadership those that are also promoted as sexually attractive in men.

Being viewed as sexy seems to be an important rite of passage for male leaders seeking power. David Cameron was voted among the world’s sexiest men in 2006. Back then he was the next big thing. That proximity to power can be a powerful aphrodisiac – just ask General Petraeus. But as David Cameron becomes inevitably worn down by the difficult job of leading – and seems to be doing that badly, with the latest IPSOS Mori leadership ratings having Ed ahead of him again – he would struggle to chart today.

So what has changed? Well not either man’s physical appearance. But perceptions of them both are changing as – potentially – are their respective career trajectories.

Miliband never had the honeymoon period that new leaders are generally given, and most of the media were convinced both that Labour had chosen the wrong guy and that they would rectify their mistake before the next election. There wasn’t a sense that Ed was a leader to be taken too seriously, and this was reflected constant mocking about his personal style as much as anything else. Nothing was off limits. Caricatures went from “Red Ed” to “Odd Ed”. “Ugly Ed” was probably the nadir.

But his Zen-like approach to politics saw him through the worst, and a much improved performance in 2012 has been the beginning of the making of Ed Miliband – Labour leader. The Party remain comfortably ahead in the polls, and following the Tories disastrous budget have largely closed the gap on trust with the economy – a vital electoral indicator.

Barack Obama just won an election where his polling on the economy was worse than his opponents, but where he scored higher on questions like “is for people like me”. As Cameron and the Tories seem to be doing everything possible to prove they aren’t on the side of ordinary voters, people are looking at Ed with new eyes. His strongest polling has always been for attributes such as “on the side of people like me”. As the tough economy subsides into a long and painful struggle, that dependability can seem very attractive.

In the end, no one is going to win an election based on sex appeal. But the fact that Ed can now – without any more mocking than you’d expect for any politician – be spoken of in such terms shows just how far the Labour leader has come in 2012.

  • AlanGiles

    Emma, If you regard Mr Miliband or Mr Cameron as “sex symbols”, with all due respect, I think you need a drop of bromide in your tea!.

    Clement Atlee, Harold Wilson or Harold McMillian would never have been thought of sex symbols, but they were a damned sight better than today’s little lightweights – of all parties.

    • aracataca

      Including of course privately educated Guardianista Natalie Bennet who, in addition to having a very rich right wing background in Australia, was so lightweight that she didn’t feel able to tell us how many people voted for her as leader in the Green Party’s ‘open and transparent’ leadership election.

    • aracataca

      Including of course privately educated Guardianista Natalie Bennet who, in addition to having a very rich right wing background in Australia, was so lightweight that she didn’t feel able to tell us how many people voted for her as leader in the Green Party’s ‘open and transparent’ leadership election.

    • aracataca

      Including of course privately educated Guardianista Natalie Bennet who, in addition to having a very rich right wing background in Australia, was so lightweight that she didn’t feel able to tell us how many people voted for her as leader in the Green Party’s ‘open and transparent’ leadership election.

  • http://twitter.com/Ceilidhann Kayleigh Anne

    I do find the sex symbol stuff quite funny but I maintain that he’s better looking than his brother. He’s also had less unfortunate banana photo-ops.

    It’s been a good year for Ed, and I think he’s benefited from having so many people underestimate him. The Tory camp are clearly regretting that, as evidenced by their sudden need to get very personal with him, and spend a large portion of their 2012 conference attempting to refute his own speech. One Nation may be a bit of a cheesy slogan but that’s two years in a row the conference season has been defined by his words. He’s also regularly beating Cameron at PMQs (which may be a silly exercise but shows how far he’s come, and exposes Cameron’s inability to defend his record. It’s also a great opportunity to show how Ed is so composed and prepared in comparison to PM’s increasingly shouty and petty performance).

    I hope that in 2013 he keeps up the attacks on the government’s cruel stance on benefits and the disabled. The party’s stance has taken a step in the right direction on this front and I’m hoping it stays that way.

    • aracataca

      imho he has been underestimated throughout his leadership. Keeping quiet for 2 years and enabling the Condems to kill themselves has turned out to be a smart move in retrospect. Even anti-Labour fanatics like Alan Giles and Serbitar have now admitted that there is a strong chance of Labour winning in 2015.

Latest

  • Featured We English need a debate like the Scots

    We English need a debate like the Scots

    I’m envious of my Scottish friends. From my limited connection to politics north of the border, the debate between politicians seems a clash between rival empty words. A coalition of dramatically different parties, there are good reason why the No campaign can’t tell a concrete story about what the United kingdom will stay together to do. But the Yes side rallies vagueness as much as hope. The SNP can’t answer basic questions about the institutions they’ll rule with. Alex Salmond […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Why Pakistanis should be angry as everyone else with what happened in Rotherham

    Why Pakistanis should be angry as everyone else with what happened in Rotherham

    The exposé of child sexual abuse in Rotherham over 16 years reads more like a horror story than an academic report. It was more than a dossier on how girls (and a few boys) were abused by gangs of men; it was also a damning indictment of multiple cover-ups at a senior institutional level. The details simply beggar belief. This isn’t the first time either. Nearly ten years ago there were similar reports of institutional failure in Keighley involving the abuse […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Farage might be UKIP’s candidate but only Labour has the answers in South Thanet

    Farage might be UKIP’s candidate but only Labour has the answers in South Thanet

    Now that Nigel Farage has announced he is throwing his hat in the ring, South Thanet is a two horse race: Labour and UKIP. The Tories have selected a former UKIP Leader meaning there is now no difference between the Tories and UKIP. With this, the Tories have abandoned the centre ground and gambled everything on trying to out-UKIP UKIP. It is clear now for people in Broadstairs, Cliftonville, Ramsgate and Sandwich that the only way to stop the two […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Labour must call for an in/out EU referendum

    Labour must call for an in/out EU referendum

    The article entitled, “Should Labour offer a referendum on the EU,” provides a comprehensive and detailed set of arguments against offering a referendum on the United Kingdom’s membership of the EU.  They are strategic arguments and initially one can fully understand the rationale behind them – allowing the Eurosceptic vote to split, gaining the support of business and picking up disaffected Liberal Democrat voters. However, there are some fundamental weaknesses in Younespour’s arguments. Dismissing UKIP is a crucial error. Whether […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Fracking regulations must be tighter

    Fracking regulations must be tighter

    This morning, Labour tabled amendments in the House of Lords to the Government’s Infrastructure Bill that would significantly tighten the regulations for shale gas extraction in the UK. Since March 2012, when I set out the environmental and regulatory conditions that needed to be met to ensure that any future shale extraction was properly controlled, Labour have pushed the Government to improve the current regulatory framework, which has crucial and unacceptable flaws. Time and again, David Cameron’s stance has eschewed responding […]

    Read more →