An insecure Britain isn’t good enough for One Nation Labour

10th September, 2013 4:45 pm

Yesterday YouGov released survey results starkly demonstrating the rise of insecurity and falling living standards in Britain under David Cameron. The number of people feeling insecure at work has almost doubled in the past three years since the Tory-led government took office. Half the working population believe the economic policies of the present government have made them feel less secure and 40% of people are worried their job will become less secure in the future.

In practice this insecurity can make life a daily struggle, meaning it is impossible to plan ahead, not knowing how much money will be coming in next week, let alone next month. In some cases it can leave people who are notionally in work living a hand to mouth existence. That kind of Britain may be good enough for out of touch Tory ministers who think ‘any old job will do’. It isn’t good enough for One Nation Labour.

The YouGov poll should make extremely worrying reading for the Tory-led government which has attacked the rights of people at work at every opportunity, making it easier to fire not hire people. Whether it is slashing protection for workers against unfair dismissal, their ridiculous ‘shares for rights’ scheme or bumping up fees for employment tribunals, they seek to heap further insecurity on working families already feeling the strain.

Added to this, under David Cameron we have seen the use of zero-hours contracts proliferate. These can provide flexibility for employers and employees which suit both parties. But, whereas  they used to be a niche element of the labour market, their use has grown so much so that now they are becoming the norm in too many parts of our economy.

And we still don’t know the true extent of the increase in their use. According to a survey of employers by the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development which represents HR professionals, there are as many as a million people employed on zero-hours contracts, while the Recruitment and Employment Confederation has found that more than a quarter of its members use them.  After I wrote to Sir Andrew Dilnot, Chair of the UK Statistics Authority, last month the ONS I am pleased he has signalled they are changing the way they assesses the numbers of employees on zero-hours contracts.  Given that many people are not aware that they are actually on a zero-hours contract, the ONS accepts its estimates may have been underreporting the scale of their use.

In spite of all this, ministers have failed to do anything about the worrying rise in zero-hours contracts. After pressure from Labour Vince Cable said his department would investigate, but it has emerged that this consists of just three officials looking at the issue amongst their many other responsibilities. No call for evidence has been issued and no formal consultation launched.

Given their failure to act, I chaired Labour’s summit on the issue last month which we held to collate evidence and hear from employees and employers.  Following our summit, Ed Miliband has this week announced the action we would take to prevent abuse and underpin better practice in the use of zero-hours contracts.  We would ban employers being able to require those on zero-hours contracts to work just for them.  We would stop workers being required to be available around the clock where they is no guarantee of work. And we’d make sure that contracts reflect the reality of people ‘s working patterns – so if someone has regular hours in practice they should be on a full time contract that reflects that.  We would also introduce a new code of practice for employers on the use of zero-hours contracts.

The former Director of Human Resources at Morrisons, Norman Pickavance, will be leading an independent consultation for us with employers and others to advise on how the measures should be implemented.

As Ed Miliband has said, the key battleground of the 2015 election will be the living standards crisis which families are facing in this country.  The cost of living and decent pay are central to this debate.  We are clear: the issue of job security is important too.

Chuka Umunna is Shadow Business Secretary and Labour MP for Streatham

To report anything from the comment section, please e-mail [email protected]

Latest

  • Featured News Unions meet Woodcock’s defence committee to discuss Trident

    Unions meet Woodcock’s defence committee to discuss Trident

    Jobs in nearly 90 Labour parliamentary seats – more than one third of those held by the Opposition – will be directly affected by the decision on whether to renew Trident, John Woodcock warns today. Woodcock, chair of the PLP backbench Defence committee, said some 88 constituencies play host to companies in the supply chain for the nuclear weapon, as he invited trade union representatives to a meeting of his group today. Officers from Unite and GMB have been asked to […]

    Read more →
  • Featured News Harman: EU referendum is too important to be left to men

    Harman: EU referendum is too important to be left to men

    Harriet Harman today says that women’s voices are being stifled in the EU referendum debate and warns that key arguments about the impact of Brexit on women are being blocked. The former Labour leader said men were “as usual” pushing out women from broadcast discussions of the referendum and called on the media regulator to intervene. Harman has written to Sharon White, chief executive of Ofcom, as she published data showing how the majority of voices on key morning news […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Luke Akehurst: My blueprint for how moderates can seize the Labour leadership… next time around

    Luke Akehurst: My blueprint for how moderates can seize the Labour leadership… next time around

    I thought I would try this week to give an honest assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of my own wing of the party and the challenges it will face in order to come back from the epic defeat it suffered at Jeremy Corbyn’s hands last summer. Before people start chuntering, “coming back” doesn’t mean toppling Jeremy. It means being in a position to be more competitive in the next leadership election to be his successor whether that comes in […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured Cruddas asks the right questions – I heard them on the doorstep of a swing seat

    Cruddas asks the right questions – I heard them on the doorstep of a swing seat

    How did it come to this? That a Labour Party fighting an arrogant, out-of-touch Tory government who failed on their core economic targets, could go down to a crushing defeat despite carrying a healthy lead in the polls for not just a few weeks, but a few years. The answer, according to Jon Cruddas, makes for painful reading. Labour, the party of work, was deserted by socially conservative working class voters who value family, work and fairness. There is a […]

    Read more →
  • Comment Featured The message, the marginals and the media: Cruddas’ home truths explained

    The message, the marginals and the media: Cruddas’ home truths explained

    The result of Jon Cruddas’ independent inquiry into Labour’s general election defeat was published today, with a piece by the author on LabourList. Here are seven key lessons to take away from the report: 1 – Have we heard it all before? Lacking economic credibility, untrusted on welfare and immigration, unable to connect on issues like communities, and lacking a clear purpose. This is not an inquiry bursting with completely undreamt of reasons for Labour’s demise last May – and […]

    Read more →
x

LabourList Daily Email

Everything Labour. Every weekday morning

Share with your friends










Submit